Mortality and clinical outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures

被引:5
|
作者
Takami, H. [1 ]
Takegami, Y. [1 ]
Tokutake, K. [1 ,2 ]
Kurokawa, H. [1 ]
Iwata, M. [1 ]
Terasawa, S. [1 ]
Oguchi, T. [1 ,3 ]
Imagama, S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Dept Hand Surg, Nagoya, Japan
[3] Anjo Kosei Hosp, Dept Orhoped Surg, Anjo, Japan
[4] Nagoya Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Grad Sch Med, Nagoya, Japan
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
periprosthetic femoral fractures; Vancouver type B; open reduction internal fixation; revision arthroplasty; HIP; ARTHROPLASTY; PROJECTIONS; MORBIDITY; FIXATION; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.41.BJO-2022-0145.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
University, Aims The objectives of this study were to investigate the patient characteristics and mortality of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) subgroups divided into two groups according to femoral component stability and to compare postoperative clinical outcomes according to treatment in Vancouver type B2 and B3 fractures.Methods A total of 126 Vancouver type B fractures were analyzed from 2010 to 2019 in 11 associat-ed centres' database (named TRON). We divided the patients into two Vancouver type B subtypes according to implant stability. Patient demographics and functional scores were assessed in the Vancouver type B subtypes. We estimated the mortality according to various patient characteristics and clinical outcomes between the open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and revision arthroplasty (revision) groups in patients with unstable subtype.Results The one -year mortality rate of the stable and unstable subtype of Vancouver type B was 9.4% and 16.4%. Patient demographic factors, including residential status and pre -injury mobility were associated with mortality. There was no significant difference in mortality between pa-tients treated with ORIF and Revision in either Vancouver B subtype. Patients treated with re-vision had significantly higher Parker Mobility Score (PMS) values (5.48 vs 3.43; p = 0.00461) and a significantly lower visual analogue scale (VAS) values (1.06 vs 1.94; p = 0.0399) for pain than ORIF in the unstable subtype.Conclusion Among patients with Vancouver type B fractures, frail patients, such as those with worse scores for residential status and pre-injury mobility, had a high mortality rate. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients treated with ORIF and those treated with revision. However, in the unstable subtype, the PMS and VAS values at the final follow-up examination were significantly better in patients who received revision. Based on post-operative activities of daily life, we therefore recommend evision in instances when either treatment option is feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Conservative Treatment for Minimally Displaced Type B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
    Lee, Young-Kyun
    Kim, Jung Taek
    Kim, Ki-Choul
    Ha, Yong-Chan
    Koo, Kyung-Hoi
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (11): : 3529 - 3532
  • [42] REVISION ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF VANCOUVER TYPE-B2 AND B3 PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES
    Haider, Thomas
    Hanna, Philip
    Mohamadi, Amin
    Merchan, Nelson
    McNichol, Megan
    Wixted, John J.
    Appleton, Paul T.
    Nazarian, Ara
    von Keudell, Arvind G.
    Rodriguez, Edward K.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [43] Femoral revision in periprosthetic fractures using a titanium modular fluted tapered stem: mortality and clinical and radiological outcomes
    Munegato, Daniele
    Caminita, Agostino Dario
    Sotiri, Romeo
    Rossi, Andrea
    Bigoni, Marco
    Zatti, Giovanni
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 30 (2_SUPPL) : 101 - 107
  • [44] Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review
    Stoffel, Karl
    Blauth, Michael
    Joeris, Alexander
    Blumenthal, Andrea
    Rometsch, Elke
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (10) : 1381 - 1394
  • [45] Fracture fixation versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a systematic review
    Karl Stoffel
    Michael Blauth
    Alexander Joeris
    Andrea Blumenthal
    Elke Rometsch
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 1381 - 1394
  • [46] Is ORIF the better treatment for periprosthetic Vancouver type B2 femur fractures?
    Schelling, Georg
    Antoniadis, Alexander
    Helmy, Nader
    Camenzind, Roland
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147 : 47S - 47S
  • [47] Impact of bone health on the mechanics of plate fixation for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Chen, Xiang
    Myers, Casey A.
    Clary, Chadd W.
    Varga, Peter
    Coombs, Dana
    DeWall, Ryan J.
    Fritz, Bryan
    Rullkoetter, Paul J.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2022, 100
  • [48] An alternate concept for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femur fractures
    Forberger, Jens
    Beck, Martin
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2012, 142 : S24 - S24
  • [49] Dynamic compression plates for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures - A 3-year follow-up of 18 cases
    Tsiridis, E
    Narvani, AA
    Timperley, JA
    Gie, GA
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2005, 76 (04) : 531 - 537
  • [50] Treatment Results of a Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Case Series: Treatment Method for Vancouver Type B2 Fractures Can Be Customized
    Niikura, Takahiro
    Lee, Sang Yang
    Sakai, Yoshitada
    Nishida, Kotaro
    Kuroda, Ryosuke
    Kurosaka, Masahiro
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 6 (02) : 138 - 145