Landmarks as lighthouses: firms' innovation and modes of exit during the business cycle

被引:3
|
作者
Cefis, Elena [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Coad, Alex [3 ]
Lucini-Paioni, Alessandro [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
[2] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Pisa, Italy
[3] Waseda Univ, Waseda Business Sch, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath, England
[6] Univ Bergamo, Dep Econ, Via Caniana, I-24127 Bergamo, Italy
基金
日本学术振兴会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Firm-level innovations; Modes of firm exit; Financial crisis; Survival analysis; Landmark analysis; Cumulative incidence function; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; COMPETING RISKS; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL REGIMES; FOREIGN OWNERSHIP; ECONOMIC-CRISIS; HAZARDS MODEL; SURVIVAL; PRODUCT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2023.104778
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We revisit the relationship between innovation and survival, tracking how innovation types (product, process, organizational, and marketing innovation) relate to exit routes (closure, failure, M & A) during different phases of the business cycle (i.e. normal times, the 2007-08 financial crisis and subsequent recovery). In particular, we implemented a new (to the economic field) econometric approach, landmark analysis, to include time-varying covariates in survival models with competing exit routes on our representative sample of Dutch firms (obtained merging monthly register data with biennial innovation surveys, for 2006-2015). Our most straightforward result is that each type of innovation, across the different phases of the business cycle, affects, in a substantially different way, the likelihood to exit the market through different modes of exit. Innovations seems to grant some innovation premium, but no common pattern appears between the evolution of the relationships between different types of innovation and exit routes across the business cycle.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Macroeconomic Instability and Business Exit: Determinants of Failures and Acquisitions of UK Firms
    Bhattacharjee, A.
    Higson, C.
    Holly, S.
    Kattumanw, P.
    [J]. ECONOMICA, 2009, 76 (301) : 108 - 131
  • [32] Coworking and Sustainable Business Model Innovation in Young Firms
    Cheah, Sarah
    Ho, Yuen-Ping
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10):
  • [33] Diffusion of Innovation in Service Firms (Hungarian versus Slovakian Business Service Firms)
    Mako, Csaba
    Csizmadia, Peter
    Illessy, Miklos
    Iwasaki, Ichiro
    Szanyi, Miklos
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR EAST EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2013, 18 (01): : 135 - 147
  • [34] Drug Discovery Firms and Business Alliances for Sustainable Innovation
    Harada, Yoshimi
    Wang, Huayi
    Kodama, Kota
    Sengoku, Shintaro
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [35] Family firms' equity entry modes: Bridging family business and international business
    D'Allura, Giorgia M.
    Calabro, Andrea
    Banno, Mariasole
    Pisano, Vincenzo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 2024,
  • [36] Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle
    Klepper, S
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 86 (03): : 562 - 583
  • [37] Linking firms' life cycle, capabilities, and green innovation
    Tariq, Adeel
    Badir, Yuosre F.
    Safdar, Umar
    Tariq, Waqas
    Badar, Kamal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 31 (02) : 284 - 305
  • [38] Exit as governance: do blockholders affect corporate innovation in large US firms?
    Helling, Axel R.
    Maury, Benjamin
    Liljeblom, Eva
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 60 (02): : 1703 - 1725
  • [39] A Study on the Modes of Open Innovation Matched With Firms' Internal Capabilities
    Chen, Yufen
    [J]. 2014 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (PICMET), 2014, : 921 - 931
  • [40] Offshore production and business cycle dynamics with heterogeneous firms
    Zlate, Andrei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 100 : 34 - 49