Procedural Justice in Their Eyes: A Qualitative Interview Study Among Detainees

被引:1
|
作者
van Hall, Matthias [1 ,3 ]
van der Laan, Peter H. [1 ]
Nieuwbeerta, Paul [2 ]
Dirkzwager, Anja J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement NSC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement NSC, Boelelaan 1077,POB 71304, NL-1008 BH Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
procedural justice; interviews; police; prison staff; judge; probation officer; PERCEPTIONS; POLICE; LEGITIMACY; PRISONERS; AUTHORITY; FAIRNESS; COURTS;
D O I
10.1177/0306624X241234857
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The literature on procedural justice has been mainly focused on examining whether a fair and respectful treatment affects justice-involved individuals' legitimacy evaluations and their behavior. It is, however, equally important to examine (a) the role that perceptions of procedural justice play for individuals in their encounters with criminal justice authorities and (b) what makes individuals feel treated procedurally (un-)just. In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 detainees in a Dutch prison, asking questions about their encounters with police officers, prison staff, judges, and probation officers. The findings showed that the majority of detainees raised issues of procedural justice, indicating that procedural justice plays an important role for them. In addition, five elements primarily shaped detainees' perceptions of procedural justice: (1) trustworthy motives, (2) interpersonal treatment, (3) neutrality, (4) participation, and (5) agency and process information. These elements of procedural justice were mentioned after encounters with most authorities.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fear of depression recurrence among individuals with remitted depression: a qualitative interview study
    Gumuchian, Stephanie T.
    Boyle, Ariel
    Hazel, Lori H.
    Ellenbogen, Mark A.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [22] Understanding help seeking behaviour among male offenders: qualitative interview study
    Howerton, Amanda
    Byng, Richard
    Campbell, John
    Hess, David
    Owens, Christabel
    Aitken, Peter
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7588): : 303 - 306B
  • [23] Beyond the quantitative and qualitative divide: The salience of discourse in procedural justice policing research
    Shon, Phillip C.
    O'Connor, Christopher
    Cesaroni, Carla
    JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2021, 54 (02): : 126 - 142
  • [24] Teaching and assessing procedural skills: a qualitative study
    Claire Touchie
    Susan Humphrey-Murto
    Lara Varpio
    BMC Medical Education, 13
  • [25] Teaching and assessing procedural skills: a qualitative study
    Touchie, Claire
    Humphrey-Murto, Susan
    Varpio, Lara
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 13
  • [26] Facilitators and barriers in preventing doping among recreational athletes: A qualitative interview study among police officers
    Kvillemo, Pia
    Strandberg, Anna K. K.
    Elgan, Tobias H. H.
    Gripenberg, Johanna
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [27] A cross-level study of procedural justice perceptions
    Hon, Alice H. Y.
    Yang, Jixia
    Lu, Lin
    JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 26 (7-8) : 700 - 715
  • [28] Study on the Effects of Procedural Justice on People in Chinese Culture
    He, Lingling
    Wang, Bohua
    Xu, Rongbin
    Chen, Haihua
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (EBM2011), VOLS 1-6, 2011, : 827 - 832
  • [29] Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: An analogue study
    Cascardi, M
    Poythress, NG
    Hall, A
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2000, 18 (06) : 731 - 740
  • [30] The relationship among distributive and procedural justice and correctional life satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent: An exploratory study
    Lambert, Eric G.
    Hogan, Nancy L.
    Jiang, Shanhe
    Elechi, O. Oko
    Benjamin, Barbaranne
    Morris, Angela
    Laux, John M.
    Dupuy, Paula
    JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2010, 38 (01) : 7 - 16