Procedural Justice in Their Eyes: A Qualitative Interview Study Among Detainees

被引:1
|
作者
van Hall, Matthias [1 ,3 ]
van der Laan, Peter H. [1 ]
Nieuwbeerta, Paul [2 ]
Dirkzwager, Anja J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement NSC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement NSC, Boelelaan 1077,POB 71304, NL-1008 BH Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
procedural justice; interviews; police; prison staff; judge; probation officer; PERCEPTIONS; POLICE; LEGITIMACY; PRISONERS; AUTHORITY; FAIRNESS; COURTS;
D O I
10.1177/0306624X241234857
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The literature on procedural justice has been mainly focused on examining whether a fair and respectful treatment affects justice-involved individuals' legitimacy evaluations and their behavior. It is, however, equally important to examine (a) the role that perceptions of procedural justice play for individuals in their encounters with criminal justice authorities and (b) what makes individuals feel treated procedurally (un-)just. In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 detainees in a Dutch prison, asking questions about their encounters with police officers, prison staff, judges, and probation officers. The findings showed that the majority of detainees raised issues of procedural justice, indicating that procedural justice plays an important role for them. In addition, five elements primarily shaped detainees' perceptions of procedural justice: (1) trustworthy motives, (2) interpersonal treatment, (3) neutrality, (4) participation, and (5) agency and process information. These elements of procedural justice were mentioned after encounters with most authorities.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Speaking of Justice: A Qualitative Interview Study on Perceived Procedural Justice among Defendants in Dutch Criminal Cases
    Ansems, Lisa F. M.
    van den Bos, Kees
    Mak, Elaine
    LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 2020, 54 (03) : 643 - 679
  • [2] Procedural justice and legitimacy of the law in the criminal justice system: a longitudinal study among Dutch detainees
    van Hall, Matthias
    Dirkzwager, Anja J. E.
    van der Laan, Peter H.
    Nieuwbeerta, Paul
    PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2024, 30 (02) : 101 - 124
  • [3] Detainees' Perceptions of Procedural Justice: An Examination Throughout the Criminal Justice System
    van Hall, Matthias
    Dirkzwager, Anja J. E.
    van der Laan, Peter H.
    Nieuwbeerta, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2024, 68 (13-14) : 1323 - 1341
  • [4] Immunization Coverage Among Juvenile Justice Detainees
    Gaskin, Gregory L.
    Glanz, Jason M.
    Binswanger, Ingrid A.
    Anoshiravani, Arash
    JOURNAL OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, 2015, 21 (03) : 265 - 275
  • [5] A Qualitative Study of Chinese Children's Concept of Procedural Justice
    Xu, Huanu
    Wong, Wan-chi
    Zhang, Chunmei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST SUMMIT FORUM OF CHINA'S CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, : 259 - +
  • [6] Differential Effects of Procedural Justice?: Examining Heterogeneity in the Perceptions and Effects of Procedural Justice Across First-Time and Recurrent Detainees
    van Hall, Matthias
    Dirkzwager, Anja J. E.
    van der Laan, Peter H.
    Nieuwbeerta, Paul
    CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 2023,
  • [7] Exploring the linkage between changes in detainees' perceptions of procedural justice and changes in misconduct
    van Hall, Matthias
    Dirkzwager, Anja J. E.
    van der Laan, Peter H.
    Nieuwbeerta, Paul
    PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2023,
  • [8] Attitudes of detainees and prison staff towards tobacco control policy in Switzerland: A qualitative interview study
    Ritter, Catherine
    Elger, Bernice S.
    HEALTH POLICY, 2014, 115 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [10] Crime victims' evaluations of procedural justice and police performance in relation to cooperation: a qualitative study in the Netherlands
    Koster, Nathalie-Sharon N.
    Van der Leun, Joanne P.
    Kunst, Maarten J. J.
    POLICING & SOCIETY, 2020, 30 (03): : 225 - 240