A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care

被引:10
|
作者
Kearney, Anna [1 ,4 ]
Gargon, Elizabeth [1 ]
Mitchell, James W. [2 ]
Callaghan, Stephen [3 ]
Yameen, Farheen [3 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [1 ]
Dodd, Susanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Syst Mol & Integrat Biol, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, NIHR, ARC, NWC, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[4] Univ Liverpool, Hlth Data Sci, Block F Waterhouse Bldg,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Lancashire, England
关键词
Core outcome sets; Routine care; Healthcare evaluation; Health outcomes; COMET; Clinical audit; Value -based healthcare; Patient; -centered; outcome measures; CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Core outcome sets (COS) represent the minimum health outcomes to be measured for a given health condition. Interest is growing in using COS within routine care to support delivery of patient-focused care. This review aims to systematically map COS developed for routine care to understand their scope, stakeholder involvement, and development methods.Methods: Medline (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science Core collection were searched for studies reporting development of COS for routine care. Data on scope, methods, and stakeholder groups were analyzed in subgroups defined by setting.Results: Screening 25,301 records identified 262 COS: 164 for routine care only and 98 for routine care and research. Nearly half of the COS (112/254, 44%) were developed with patients, alongside input from experts in registries, insurance, legal, outcomes measurement, and performance management. Research publications were often searched to generate an initial list of outcomes (115/198, 58%) with few searching routine health records (47/198, 24%).Conclusion: An increasing number of COS is being developed for routine care. Although involvement of patient stakeholders has increased in recent years, further improvements are needed. Methodology and scope are broadly similar to COS for research but implementation of the final set is a greater consideration during development.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Mapping Review of Core Outcome Reporting in Surgical Research for Oesophageal Cancer
    Matias, Nadia
    Thomson, Jack
    Naqvi, Anie
    Alkhaffaf, Bilal
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110
  • [42] DEVELOPMENT OF 'CORE OUTCOME SETS' FOR MENINGIOMA IN CLINICAL STUDIES: THE COSMIC PROJECT
    Millward, Christopher
    Keshwara, Sumirat
    Islim, Abdurrahman
    Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
    Marson, Tony
    Williamson, Paula
    Jenkinson, Michael
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 : 22 - 22
  • [43] A review of core outcome sets (COS) developed for different settings finds there is a subset of outcomes relevant for both research and routine care
    Kearney, Anna
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Dodd, Susanna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 173
  • [44] Patient participation in Delphi surveys to develop core outcome sets: systematic review
    Barrington, Heather
    Young, Bridget
    Williamson, Paula R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [45] Analysis of outcome reporting in sciatic neuropathy studies: a systematic review of the literature
    Dinh, Jenny
    Wilson, Thomas J.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [46] Outcome Reporting in Studies on Pregnant Women With Cardiac Disease: A Systematic Review
    Hall, Chelsea
    Shishkina, Anna
    Pal, Ankita
    D'Souza, Rohan D.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 188S - 188S
  • [47] Variation in outcome reporting in studies on obesity in pregnancy-A systematic review
    Dadouch, Rachel
    Faheim, Mina
    Susini, Orsolina
    Sedra, Silvana
    Showell, Marian
    D'Souza, Rohan
    Kingdom, John
    Parsons, Janet
    Maxwell, Cynthia
    Windrim, Rory
    CLINICAL OBESITY, 2019, 9 (06)
  • [48] Outcome reporting in studies on critically ill obstetric patients: A systematic review
    Viau-Lapointe, Julien
    Kfouri, Julia
    Thompson, Mary
    Ashraf, Rizwana
    D'Souza, Rohan
    Lapinsky, Stephen
    OBSTETRIC MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [49] A systematic review of core outcome set development studies demonstrates difficulties in defining unique outcomes
    Young, Amber E.
    Brookes, Sara T.
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Davies, Anna
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 115 : 14 - 24
  • [50] Substantial heterogeneity found in reporting mortality in Cochrane systematic reviews and Core Outcome Sets in COMET database
    Tomlinson, Eve
    Pardo, Jordi Pardo
    Dodd, Susanna
    Sivesind, Torunn
    Szeto, Mindy D.
    Dellavalle, Robert P.
    Skoetz, Nicole
    Laughter, Melissa
    Wells, George A.
    Tugwell, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 145 : 47 - 54