Reliability and validation of the Chinese version of the epilepsy surgery satisfaction questionnaire

被引:1
|
作者
Yu, Qun [1 ]
Ying, Yu-qi [2 ]
Jiang, Si-xuan [1 ]
Xu, Zheng-Yan-Ran [3 ]
Lan, Mei-juan [1 ]
Guo, Yi [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Nursing Dept, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 4, Int Inst Med, Dept Neurosurg,Sch Med, Yiwu, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Dept Neurol,Epilepsy Ctr, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Gen Practice & Int Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
[5] Key Lab Med Mol Imaging Zhejiang Prov, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hangzhou 310009, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chinese mainland; Epilepsy surgery; Questionnaire; Satisfaction; Validation; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109438
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity the Chinese version of 19-item Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (C-ESSQ-19) in Chinese mainland patients.Methods: Patients with epilepsy who had epilepsy surgery in our hospital one year earlier were included. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by using Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Confirmatory factor analysis was used for construct validity. Discriminant validity was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.Results: A total of 132 patients participated in our study, consisting of 59 females and 73 males. The C-ESSQ-19 yielded a median summary score of 86.5 (IQR=72.7-98.0). The Cronbach's alpha of the four domains of the C-ESSQ-19 ranged from 0.746 to 0.973. The test-retest reliability evaluated by ICC were good to excellent, ranging from 0.71 to 0.90 (P < 0.001). The C-ESSQ-19 demonstrated excellent construct validity, as indicated by the satisfactory goodness-of-fit of the data (SRMR = 0.046; CFI = 1.000). It exhibited acceptable discriminant validity for differentiating between patients excised or not (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.59-0.86) and self-rated severity of epilepsy (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.67-0.86), but poor discriminant validity for other factors, such as being seizure-free or not (AUC = 0.66, CI = 0.56-0.75), depressed or not (AUC = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.54-0.79), and self-rated disability related to seizures (AUC = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.50-0.80).Conclusions: The C-ESSQ-19 has proven to be a reliable and valid self-rated questionnaire for assessing the satisfaction of Chinese mainland epilepsy patients with surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Validation and Reliability of the French Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire
    Audag, Nicolas
    Goubau, Christophe
    Danses, Etienne
    Vandervelde, Laure
    Liistro, Giuseppe
    Toussaint, Michel
    Reychler, Gregory
    DYSPHAGIA, 2019, 34 (04) : 556 - 566
  • [12] Linguistic Validation and Reliability of the Croatian Version of the TOPICOP Questionnaire
    Cagalj, Adela Markota
    Markic, Josko
    Vukovic, Dubravka
    Ceprnja, Zdenka Situm
    Salapic, Tina Gogic
    Buljan, Ivan
    Pranic, Shelly Melissa
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (06):
  • [13] Validation and Reliability of the French Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire
    Nicolas Audag
    Christophe Goubau
    Etienne Danse
    Laure Vandervelde
    Giuseppe Liistro
    Michel Toussaint
    Gregory Reychler
    Dysphagia, 2019, 34 : 556 - 566
  • [14] Reliability and Validation of the Persian Version of JUICE Study Questionnaire
    Rayatpisheh, Maryam
    Nasseri-Moghaddam, Saba
    Kherad, Afsoon
    Kanno, Takeshi
    Sima, Ali Reza
    Moayyedi, Paul
    Nasseri-Moghaddam, Siavosh
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [15] Chinese version of the Constant-Murley questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability: a reliability and validation study
    Yao, Min
    Yang, Long
    Cao, Zuo-yuan
    Cheng, Shao-dan
    Tian, Shuang-lin
    Sun, Yue-li
    Wang, Jing
    Xu, Bao-ping
    Hu, Xiao-chun
    Wang, Yong-jun
    Zhang, Ying
    Cui, Xue-jun
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
  • [16] Chinese version of the Constant-Murley questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability: a reliability and validation study
    Min Yao
    Long Yang
    Zuo-yuan Cao
    Shao-dan Cheng
    Shuang-lin Tian
    Yue-li Sun
    Jing Wang
    Bao-ping Xu
    Xiao-chun Hu
    Yong-jun Wang
    Ying Zhang
    Xue-jun Cui
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15
  • [17] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire
    Wu, Qing
    Guo, AiMin
    Zhao, YanWei
    Li, Sijia
    Huang, Hui
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2018, 15 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [18] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire
    Lin, Chuan-Ju
    Shiah, I-Shin
    Chu, Hsin
    Tsai, Pei-Shan
    Chen, Chiung-Hua
    Chang, Yue-Cune
    Chou, Kuei-Ru
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2011, 25 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [19] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE PAEDIATRIC VOLITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE - CHINESE VERSION
    Liu, Li-Ting
    Pan, Ay-Woan
    Chung, Lylnn
    Gau, Susan Shur-Fen
    Kramer, Jessica
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [20] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the sunlight exposure questionnaire
    Wang, Xiaoxia
    Wang, Qin
    Li, Zhe
    Chen, Mengjie
    Guo, Maoting
    Kong, Laixi
    Chen, Liyuan
    Li, Xiaolong
    Li, Junjun
    Cao, Qieyan
    Luo, Zhenhua
    Xiong, Zhenzhen
    Zhao, Dan
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12