Global plastic waste recycling and extended producer responsibility laws

被引:18
|
作者
Tumu, Khairun [1 ,2 ]
Vorst, Keith [1 ,2 ]
Curtzwiler, Greg [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Polymer & Food Protect Consortium, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Polymer & Food Protect Consortium, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
Plastics waste; Plastics recycling; Policy/legislation; Extended producer responsibility (EPR); Solid waste management (SWM);
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119242
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the USA, 8.66% of municipal solid waste (MSW) plastic was recycled and 75.9% landfilled (2018). Some critical challenges in widespread adoption of post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic include high collection costs, sortation complexity, inconsistent feedstock properties, and unknown contamination leading to safety considerations. The objective of this review is to discuss global Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policies/regulations and their ability to facilitate coordination of domestic/international policies and business to overcome critical recycling complications. Global EPR and recycling laws were examined to compare and contrast initiatives to increase recycling and avoid plastic waste generation. EPR laws increase producers' liability towards product generation, marketing, and disposal by applying fees and taxes on products depending on product recyclability and volume generation. Countries with established plastic EPR regulations and landfill bans often possess higher recycling rates. The results of this research can facilitate development of local regulatory mandates to increase recycling rates.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Challenges of implementing extended producer responsibility for plastic-waste management: lessons from India
    Gupta, Dipti
    Dash, Satya
    [J]. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2023, 19 (09) : 1595 - 1612
  • [22] Theoretical Framework for Plastic Waste Management in Ghana through Extended Producer Responsibility: Case of Sachet Water Waste
    Quartey, Ebo Tawiah
    Tosefa, Hero
    Danquah, Kwasi Asare Baffour
    Obrsalova, Ilona
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (08): : 9907 - 9919
  • [23] Extended producer responsibility in Brazil: the case of tyre waste
    Milanez, Bruno
    Buehrs, Ton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (06) : 608 - 615
  • [24] Influence of scope definition in recycling rate calculation for European e-waste extended producer responsibility
    Arduin, Rachel Horta
    Grimaud, Guilhem
    Leal, Jorge Martinez
    Pompidou, Stephane
    Charbuillet, Carole
    Laratte, Bertrand
    Alix, Thecle
    Perry, Nicolas
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 84 : 256 - 268
  • [25] The effect of plastic packaging recycling policy interventions as a complement to extended producer responsibility schemes: A partial equilibrium model
    Larrain, Macarena
    Billen, Pieter
    Van Passel, Steven
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 153 : 355 - 366
  • [26] Recycling Infrastructure Development under Extended Producer Responsibility in Developing Economies
    Gui, Luyi
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 29 (08) : 1858 - 1877
  • [27] Product durability and extended producer responsibility in solid waste management
    Runkel, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 24 (02): : 161 - 182
  • [28] Environmental impact of voluntary extended producer responsibility: The case of carpet recycling
    Choi, Taelim
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 127 : 76 - 84
  • [29] Extended producer responsibility
    Anon
    [J]. 1600, Rogers Media (54):
  • [30] The organization of extended producer responsibility in waste policy with product differentiation
    Fleckinger, Pierre
    Glachant, Matthieu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 59 (01) : 57 - 66