Determining essential criteria for selection of risk assessment techniques in occupational health and safety: A hybrid framework of fuzzy Delphi method

被引:17
|
作者
Jahanvand, Bahar [1 ]
Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher [1 ]
Mahabadi, Hassan Asilian [1 ]
Ahmadi, Omran [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tarbiat Modares, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Selection criteria; Risk assessment techniques; Meta-synthesis; Fuzzy Delphi method; Group decision-making; Structured interview; METHODOLOGIES; TOOL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106253
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A large number of techniques have been developed to assess risks in the field of occupational health and safety (OHS). These techniques are applied to identify, analyze, and evaluate the risks. Ambiguity and lack of explicit instruction and a structured framework in the selection sometimes result in applying inappropriate techniques. Before selecting, it is necessary to evaluate and prioritize alternatives based on weighting in precise and well-defined criteria. In this study, to determine the essential criteria with a mixed approach in the form of a hybrid framework, first, influential factors in risk assessment technique selection mentioned by previous studies were studied. Then through meta-synthesis of data, these factors were separated into four categories, 1) factors related to the organizations' characteristics, 2) factors related to the characteristics of techniques, 3) factors related to stakeholder participation, and 4) selection criteria for weighting risk assessment techniques. The fourth category, separated as selection criteria, was put to the opinion and judgment of OHS experts for validation. Using the fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM), which decreases the degree of uncertainty in the results by fuzzy cal-culations, after two rounds of questionnaire interviews, 89% of the experts and above with moderate agreement, equivalent to the value of Fleiss kappa coefficient of 0.4, rated the specified criteria as relatively to undoubtedly important. Finally, a ranked list of 25 essential weighting criteria was presented in the form of nine dimensions, along with their comprehensive definitions. In the opinion of this study's experts, the dimension 'To be comprehensive' gained the maximum importance, especially in two criteria, 'System components coverage' and 'Hazards and failures coverage'. The criteria rating in this study was without considering a specific organization or industry. Therefore, decision-makers can apply these criteria to select risk assessment techniques for various industries and organizations. The priorities of the criteria, however, may vary in other specific situations depending on the participation of other stakeholders in weighing the criteria to compare the techniques and select the most efficient ones.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] HEALTH-SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF POWER PLANTS USING MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHOD
    Jozi, Seyed Ali
    Pouriyeh, Amaneh Alsadat
    CHEMICAL INDUSTRY & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING QUARTERLY, 2011, 17 (04) : 437 - 449
  • [32] Introducing a method for Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) risk assessment, using multi- criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques: a case study in power plant construction
    FazIollah, A.
    Mohammadfam, I.
    HadgiParvaneh, M. J.
    Omidvari, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, 2014, 4 (01) : 55 - +
  • [33] Occupational Health and Safety Risk Assessment based on Combination Weighting and Uncertain Linguistic Information: Method Development and Application to a Construction Project
    Liu, Ran
    Mou, Xun
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    IISE TRANSACTIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOMICS & HUMAN FACTORS, 2020, 8 (04): : 175 - 186
  • [34] An extended SECA-GDM method considering flexible linguistic scale optimization and its application in occupational health and safety risk assessment
    Tian, Hao
    Zhang, Shitao
    Garg, Harish
    Liu, Xiaodi
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 88 : 317 - 330
  • [35] A new standardisation and selection framework for real-time image dehazing algorithms from multi-foggy scenes based on fuzzy Delphi and hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis methods
    Karrar Hameed Abdulkareem
    Nureize Arbaiy
    A. A. Zaidan
    B. B. Zaidan
    O. S. Albahri
    M. A. Alsalem
    Mahmood M. Salih
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33 : 1029 - 1054
  • [36] A new standardisation and selection framework for real-time image dehazing algorithms from multi-foggy scenes based on fuzzy Delphi and hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis methods
    Abdulkareem, Karrar Hameed
    Arbaiy, Nureize
    Zaidan, A. A.
    Zaidan, B. B.
    Albahri, O. S.
    Alsalem, M. A.
    Salih, Mahmood M.
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2021, 33 (04): : 1029 - 1054
  • [38] A New Multi-Criteria Assessment Model Combining GRA Techniques with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method for Sustainable Building Materials Supplier Selection
    Chen, Chun-Ho
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08):
  • [39] Safety, health, and environmental risk assessment of the aromatic outlet of Imam Khomeini Petrochemical Company using LOPA and fuzzy-LOPA and pollutants and control actions using the Bow-tie method
    Sarafraz, Pariya
    Varshosaz, Katayoon
    Orak, Neda
    Jaafarzadeh, Nematollah
    Aghajari, Ebrahim
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11