Determining essential criteria for selection of risk assessment techniques in occupational health and safety: A hybrid framework of fuzzy Delphi method

被引:17
|
作者
Jahanvand, Bahar [1 ]
Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher [1 ]
Mahabadi, Hassan Asilian [1 ]
Ahmadi, Omran [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tarbiat Modares, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Selection criteria; Risk assessment techniques; Meta-synthesis; Fuzzy Delphi method; Group decision-making; Structured interview; METHODOLOGIES; TOOL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106253
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A large number of techniques have been developed to assess risks in the field of occupational health and safety (OHS). These techniques are applied to identify, analyze, and evaluate the risks. Ambiguity and lack of explicit instruction and a structured framework in the selection sometimes result in applying inappropriate techniques. Before selecting, it is necessary to evaluate and prioritize alternatives based on weighting in precise and well-defined criteria. In this study, to determine the essential criteria with a mixed approach in the form of a hybrid framework, first, influential factors in risk assessment technique selection mentioned by previous studies were studied. Then through meta-synthesis of data, these factors were separated into four categories, 1) factors related to the organizations' characteristics, 2) factors related to the characteristics of techniques, 3) factors related to stakeholder participation, and 4) selection criteria for weighting risk assessment techniques. The fourth category, separated as selection criteria, was put to the opinion and judgment of OHS experts for validation. Using the fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM), which decreases the degree of uncertainty in the results by fuzzy cal-culations, after two rounds of questionnaire interviews, 89% of the experts and above with moderate agreement, equivalent to the value of Fleiss kappa coefficient of 0.4, rated the specified criteria as relatively to undoubtedly important. Finally, a ranked list of 25 essential weighting criteria was presented in the form of nine dimensions, along with their comprehensive definitions. In the opinion of this study's experts, the dimension 'To be comprehensive' gained the maximum importance, especially in two criteria, 'System components coverage' and 'Hazards and failures coverage'. The criteria rating in this study was without considering a specific organization or industry. Therefore, decision-makers can apply these criteria to select risk assessment techniques for various industries and organizations. The priorities of the criteria, however, may vary in other specific situations depending on the participation of other stakeholders in weighing the criteria to compare the techniques and select the most efficient ones.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] A Hybrid Fuzzy Risk Assessment Framework for Determining Building Demolition Safety Index
    Alipour-Bashary, Milad
    Ravanshadnia, Mehdi
    Abbasianjahromi, Hamidreza
    Asnaashari, Ehsan
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 25 (04) : 1144 - 1162
  • [2] A Hybrid Fuzzy Risk Assessment Framework for Determining Building Demolition Safety Index
    Milad Alipour-Bashary
    Mehdi Ravanshadnia
    Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi
    Ehsan Asnaashari
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 25 : 1144 - 1162
  • [3] Standardized risk assessment techniques: A review in the framework of occupational safety
    Brocal, F.
    Gonzalez, C.
    Sebastian, M. A.
    Reniers, G. L. L.
    Paltrinieri, N.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 2889 - 2895
  • [4] Occupational health and safety risk assessment using a fuzzy multi-criteria approach in a hospital in Chennai, India
    Badida, Pavanaditya
    Janakiraman, Selvan
    Jayaprakash, Jayapriya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2023, 29 (03) : 1047 - 1056
  • [5] MEVA - a new method of occupational health and safety risk assessment
    Darabont, Doru-Costin
    Smidu, Eduard
    Trifu, Alina
    Ciocirlea, Vicentiu
    Ivan, Iulian
    Bejinariu, Costica
    Baciu, Constantin
    Bernevig-Sava, Mihai-Adrian
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND EDUCATION (MSE 2019): TRENDS IN NEW INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, 2019, 290
  • [6] A fuzzy-based occupational health and safety risk assessment framework and a case study in an international port authority
    Gul, Muhammet
    JOURNAL OF MARINE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 19 (04): : 161 - 175
  • [7] A comprehensive risk assessment framework for occupational health and safety in pharmaceutical warehouses using Pythagorean fuzzy Bayesian networks
    Ayyildiz, Ertugrul
    Erdogan, Melike
    Gul, Muhammet
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 135
  • [8] Forensic Investigation techniques contribution in the Occupational Safety & Health Risk Assessment and Management
    Borchiellini, Romano
    Fargione, Paolo
    Maida, Luisa
    Patrucco, Mario
    Piantanida, Paolo
    Pira, Enrico
    GEAM-GEOINGEGNERIA AMBIENTALE E MINERARIA-GEAM-GEOENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT AND MINING, 2016, (148): : 33 - 42
  • [9] Occupational Health and Safety Within the Scope of Risk Analysis with Fuzzy Proportional Risk Assessment Technique (Fuzzy Prat)
    Supciller, Aliye Ayca
    Abali, Nilsu
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 31 (07) : 1137 - 1150
  • [10] A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions
    Gul, Muhammet
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2018, 24 (07): : 1723 - 1760