Association of deep phenotyping with diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal brain abnormalities

被引:3
|
作者
Drexler, Kathleen A. [1 ,5 ]
Talati, Asha N. [1 ]
Gilmore, Kelly L. [1 ]
Veazey, Rachel V. [1 ]
Powell, Bradford C. [2 ]
Weck, Karen E. [3 ]
Davis, Erica E. [4 ]
Vora, Neeta L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Pediat, Div Genet & Metab, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Genet, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Stanley Manne Childrens Res Inst, Feinberg Sch Med,Dept Cell & Dev Biol,Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL USA
[5] 3010 Old Clin,CB 7516, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Congenital anomalies; Deep phenotyping; Exome sequencing; Fetal brain anomalies; Prenatal diagnosis; ULTRASOUND; ANOMALIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gim.2023.100915
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate whether deep prenatal phenotyping of fetal brain abnormalities (FBAs) increases diagnostic yield of trio-exome sequencing (ES) compared with standard phenotyping.Methods: Retrospective exploratory analysis of a multicenter prenatal ES study. Participants were eligible if an FBA was diagnosed and subsequently found to have a normal microarray. Deep phenotyping was defined as phenotype based on targeted ultrasound plus prenatal/post-natal magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy, and/or known phenotypes of other affected family members. Standard phenotyping was based on targeted ultrasound alone. FBAs were categorized by major brain findings on prenatal ultrasound. Cases with positive ES results were compared with those that have negative results by available phenotyping, as well as diagnosed FBAs.Results: A total of 76 trios with FBAs were identified, of which 25 (33%) cases had positive ES results and 51 (67%) had negative results. Individual modalities of deep phenotyping were not associated with diagnostic ES results. The most common FBAs identified were posterior fossa anomalies and midline defects. Neural tube defects were significantly associated with receipt of a negative ES result (0% vs 22%, P = .01).Conclusion: Deep phenotyping was not associated with increased diagnostic yield of ES for FBA in this small cohort. Neural tube defects were associated with negative ES results.& COPY; 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step
    Hillman, S. C.
    Willams, D.
    Carss, K. J.
    McMullan, D. J.
    Hurles, M. E.
    Kilby, M. D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) : 4 - 9
  • [42] Integration of prenatal exome sequencing with extensive clinical phenotyping to assess fetal structural anomalies in a consanguineous cohort from Egypt
    El-Dessouky, Sara
    Aboulghar, Mona
    Maroofian, Reza
    Abdelfattah, Ahmed
    Eid, Maha
    Sharaf-Eldin, Wessam
    Zaki, Maha
    Ebrashy, Alaa
    Gaafar, Hassan
    Saad, Ahmed
    Issa, Mahmoud
    Alavi, Shahryar
    Firoozfar, Zahra
    Ateya, Mohamed
    Fouad, Mona
    Abdella, Rana
    Elarab, Ahmed Ezz
    Abdalla, Ebtesam
    Abdel-Aziz, Nahla
    Khaled, Haitham
    Elhodiby, Mohamed
    Senousy, Sameh
    Tajsharghi, Homa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 951 - 952
  • [43] Evaluation of Diagnostic Yield in Fetal Whole-Exome Sequencing: A Report on 45 Consecutive Families
    Greenbaum, Lior
    Pode-Shakked, Ben
    Eisenberg-Barzilai, Shlomit
    Dicastro-Keidar, Michal
    Bar-Ziv, Anat
    Goldstein, Nurit
    Reznik-Wolf, Haike
    Poran, Hana
    Rigbi, Amihai
    Barel, Ortal
    Bertoli-Avella, Aida M.
    Bauer, Peter
    Regev, Miriam
    Raas-Rothschildo, Annick
    Pras, Elon
    Berkenstadt, Michal
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2019, 10
  • [44] Diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray and trio whole exome sequencing in congenital brain anomalies
    Fonova, E. A.
    Kashevarova, A. A.
    Lopatkina, M. E.
    Sivtsev, A. A.
    Zarubin, A. A.
    Demeneva, V. V.
    Seitova, G. N.
    Minaycheva, L. I.
    Salyukova, O. A.
    Fadyushina, S. V.
    Petrova, V. V.
    Belyaeva, E. O.
    Nazarenko, L. P.
    Lebedev, I. N.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 66 : S887 - S887
  • [45] Application of whole exome sequencing in fetal cases with skeletal abnormalities
    Cao, Juan
    Chen, An'er
    Tian, Liyun
    Yan, Lulu
    Li, Haibo
    Zhou, Bihua
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (07)
  • [46] The Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Idiopathic Short Stature
    Aljazaeri, Sara
    Alrubeh, Zahra
    Alabdi, Lama
    Alhuthil, Raghad
    Alsagheir, Afaf
    Alkuraya, Fowzan
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2024, 97 : 511 - 511
  • [47] Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with renal malformations
    Koenigbauer, J.
    Weichert, A.
    Fangmann, L.
    Gabriel, H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 27 - 27
  • [48] Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in congenital vertical talus
    Tayebi, Naeimeh
    Charng, Wu-Lin
    Dickson, Patricia, I
    Dobbs, Matthew B.
    Gurnett, Christina A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2022, 65 (06)
  • [49] Diagnostic yield and clinical utility of clinical exome sequencing
    Narravula, A.
    Kienle, N.
    Hoevel, I.
    Romito, A.
    Bertoli-Avella, A.
    Yuksel, Z.
    Paknia, O.
    Nampoothiri, S.
    Hadipour, Z.
    Hadipour, F.
    Oprea, G.
    Kishore, S.
    Bauer, P.
    Rolfs, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 498 - 499
  • [50] Beyond Diagnostic Yield: Prenatal Exome Sequencing Results in Maternal, Neonatal, and Familial Clinical Management Changes
    Tolusso, Leandra K.
    Hazelton, Paige
    Wong, Beatrix
    Swarr, Daniel T.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2021, 76 (11) : 663 - 664