Association of deep phenotyping with diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal brain abnormalities

被引:3
|
作者
Drexler, Kathleen A. [1 ,5 ]
Talati, Asha N. [1 ]
Gilmore, Kelly L. [1 ]
Veazey, Rachel V. [1 ]
Powell, Bradford C. [2 ]
Weck, Karen E. [3 ]
Davis, Erica E. [4 ]
Vora, Neeta L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Pediat, Div Genet & Metab, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Genet, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Stanley Manne Childrens Res Inst, Feinberg Sch Med,Dept Cell & Dev Biol,Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL USA
[5] 3010 Old Clin,CB 7516, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Congenital anomalies; Deep phenotyping; Exome sequencing; Fetal brain anomalies; Prenatal diagnosis; ULTRASOUND; ANOMALIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gim.2023.100915
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate whether deep prenatal phenotyping of fetal brain abnormalities (FBAs) increases diagnostic yield of trio-exome sequencing (ES) compared with standard phenotyping.Methods: Retrospective exploratory analysis of a multicenter prenatal ES study. Participants were eligible if an FBA was diagnosed and subsequently found to have a normal microarray. Deep phenotyping was defined as phenotype based on targeted ultrasound plus prenatal/post-natal magnetic resonance imaging, autopsy, and/or known phenotypes of other affected family members. Standard phenotyping was based on targeted ultrasound alone. FBAs were categorized by major brain findings on prenatal ultrasound. Cases with positive ES results were compared with those that have negative results by available phenotyping, as well as diagnosed FBAs.Results: A total of 76 trios with FBAs were identified, of which 25 (33%) cases had positive ES results and 51 (67%) had negative results. Individual modalities of deep phenotyping were not associated with diagnostic ES results. The most common FBAs identified were posterior fossa anomalies and midline defects. Neural tube defects were significantly associated with receipt of a negative ES result (0% vs 22%, P = .01).Conclusion: Deep phenotyping was not associated with increased diagnostic yield of ES for FBA in this small cohort. Neural tube defects were associated with negative ES results.& COPY; 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep phenotyping and association with diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal brain abnormalities
    Drexler, Kathleen
    Talati, Asha
    Gilmore, Kelly L.
    Veazey, Rachel
    Powell, Bradford C.
    Weck, Karen
    Vora, Neeta L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S59 - S60
  • [2] The diagnostic yield provided by prenatal-exome sequencing in fetal abnormality
    Stocker, L. J.
    de Burca, A.
    Brown, G.
    Parasuraman, R.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 27 - 27
  • [3] Whole exome sequencing for fetal structural anomalies: Diagnostic yield in prenatal care
    Alhahsmi, N.
    Nader, E.
    Al Hinai, M.
    Al Alawi, I.
    Al Lawati, R.
    Al Bandari, M.
    Al Salmani, M.
    Al Fahdi, B.
    Al Saadi, B.
    Al Aamri, S.
    Al Ghailani, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 : 71 - 71
  • [4] Prenatal exome and genome sequencing for fetal structural abnormalities
    Vora, Neeta L.
    Norton, Mary E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (02) : 140 - 149
  • [5] Postnatal phenotyping after negative prenatal exome sequencing for fetal anomalies
    Swanson, Kate
    Hodoglugil, Ugur
    Sparks, Teresa N.
    Lianoglou, Billie R.
    Norton, Mary E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S49 - S50
  • [6] Diagnostic Value of prenatal Exome Analysis in fetal Ultrasound Abnormalities
    Neuhann, T.
    Schiesser, M.
    Meschede, D.
    Ibisler, A.
    Huber, A.
    Zikulnig, E.
    Rabenstein, H.
    Laner, A.
    Kleinle, S.
    Holinski-Feder, E.
    Abicht, A.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2022, 82 (10) : E130 - E130
  • [7] Whole exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis in cases with fetal anomalies: Criteria to improve diagnostic yield
    Yadava, Stacy M.
    Ashkinadze, Elena
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2019, 28 (02) : 251 - 255
  • [8] Beyond diagnostic yield: use of exome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis
    Pan, M.
    Li, D. -Z.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (05) : 697 - 698
  • [9] Diagnostic yield of pediatric and prenatal exome sequencing in a diverse population
    Slavotinek, Anne
    Rego, Shannon
    Sahin-Hodoglugil, Nuriye
    Kvale, Mark
    Lianoglou, Billie
    Yip, Tiffany
    Hoban, Hannah
    Outram, Simon
    Anguiano, Beatrice
    Chen, Flavia
    Michelson, Jeremy
    Cilio, Roberta M.
    Curry, Cynthia
    Gallagher, Renata C.
    Gardner, Marisa
    Kuperman, Rachel
    Mendelsohn, Bryce
    Sherr, Elliott
    Shieh, Joseph
    Strober, Jonathan
    Tam, Allison
    Tenney, Jessica
    Weiss, William
    Whittle, Amy
    Chin, Garrett
    Faubel, Amanda
    Prasad, Hannah
    Mavura, Yusuph
    Van Ziffle, Jessica
    Devine, W. Patrick
    Hodoglugil, Ugur
    Martin, Pierre-Marie
    Sparks, Teresa N.
    Koenig, Barbara
    Ackerman, Sara
    Risch, Neil
    Kwok, Pui-Yan
    Norton, Mary E.
    NPJ GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [10] The diagnostic yield of prenatal exome sequencing in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies
    Diderich, Karin
    Thurik, Florentine
    Wilke, Martina
    Joosten, Marieke
    van den Born, Myrthe
    Galjaard, Robert-Jan
    Weerts, Marjolein
    van Slegtenhorst, Marjon
    Sleutels, Frank
    Galjaard, Sander
    Knapen, Maarten
    Go, Attie
    Hoefsloot, Lies
    Srebniak, Malgorzata
    Bruggenwirth, Hennie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2023, 31 : 364 - 364