Conization before radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A Korean multicenter study (COBRA-R)

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Se Ik [1 ]
Nam, So Hyun [2 ]
Hwangbo, Suhyun [3 ]
Kim, Yeorae [4 ]
Cho, Hyun-Woong [5 ]
Suh, Dong Hoon [1 ,4 ]
Song, Jae Yun [6 ]
Kim, Jae-Weon [1 ]
Choi, Chel Hun [7 ,9 ]
Kim, Dae-Yeon [2 ,10 ]
Lee, Maria [1 ,8 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Genom Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seongnam, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Guro Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, 81 Irwon ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[10] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, 88 Olymp ro 43 gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[11] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, 101 Daehak ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Cervical cancer; Conization; Radical hysterectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Recurrence; Survival; Prognosis; RECURRENCE; ADENOCARCINOMA; PROPENSITY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To investigate the impact of conization on survival outcomes and to identify a specific population that might benefit from conization before radical hysterectomy (RH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.Methods. From six institutions in Korea, we identified node-negative, margin-negative, parametria-negative, 2009 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2006 and 2021. The patients were divided into multiple groups based on tumor size, surgical approach, and histology. We performed a series of independent 1:1 propensity score matching and compared the survival outcomes between the conization and non-conization groups.Results. In total, 1254 patients were included: conization (n = 355) and non-conization (n = 899). Among the matched patients with a tumor size of >2 cm, the conization group showed a significantly better 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate compared with the non-conization group when RH was conducted via minimally invasive surgery (MIS), in those with squamous cell carcinoma (96.3% vs. 87.4%, P = 0.007) and non-squamous cell carcinoma (97.0% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.021). However, no difference in DFS was observed between the two groups among the matched patients with a tumor size of <= 2 cm, regardless of surgical approach or histological type. In patients who underwent MIS RH, DFS significantly worsened as the residual tumor size increased (P < 0.001).Conclusion. Cervical conization was associated with a lower recurrence rate in patients with early-stage cervical cancer with a tumor size of >2 cm who underwent primary MIS RH. Cervical conization may be per-formed prior to MIS RH to minimize the uterine residual tumor.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 97
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of total Laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer - In Reply
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Ramirez, Pedro
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (05): : 1174 - 1175
  • [42] Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
    Kim, D.
    Park, J.
    Suh, D.
    Kim, J.
    Kim, Y.
    Kim, Y.
    Nam, J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (03) : S94 - S94
  • [43] Risk Factors for Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Ponce, Jordi
    Fernandez-Gonzalez, Sergi
    Gil-Moreno, Antonio
    Coronado, Pluvio J.
    De la Rosa, Jesus
    Nabais, Henrique
    Hernandez, Gines
    Taltavull, Anna
    Gilabert-Estelles, Juan
    Martinez-Roman, Sergio
    Barahona, Manel
    Barahona, Marc
    Martinez-Maestre, Maria Angeles
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 11
  • [44] Multicenter study of minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes
    Brandt, B.
    Sioulas, V.
    LaVigne, K.
    Shahin, M. S.
    Bruce, S. F.
    Black, D.
    Gandhi, M.
    Scalici, J. M.
    Jones, N. L.
    Paladugu, R.
    Brown, J.
    Levine, M. D.
    Naumann, R. W.
    Mendivil, A.
    Goldstein, B.
    Lim, P. C.
    Kang, E.
    Cantrell, L. A.
    Sullivan, M. W.
    Abu-Rustum, N. R.
    Leitao, M. M., Jr.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 26 - 26
  • [45] Criteria for the safety of less radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A multicenter study
    Kim, M.
    Kim, H.
    Jeon, Y.
    Kim, Y.
    Kim, T.
    Lim, M.
    Choi, C.
    Chang, S.
    Park, S.
    Kim, B.
    Kim, J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) : S126 - S127
  • [46] Assessing the role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Di Donato, Violante
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Casarin, Jvan
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Malzoni, Mario
    Greggi, Stefano
    Landoni, Fabio
    Bazzurini, Luca
    Zanagnolo, Vanna
    Multinu, Francesco
    Angioli, Roberto
    Plotti, Francesco
    Caruso, Giuseppe
    Fischetti, Margherita
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 275 : 64 - 69
  • [47] Modify or abandon: minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Uppal, Shitanshu
    Spencer, Ryan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (05) : 843 - 844
  • [48] Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Melamed, Alexander
    Margul, Daniell J.
    Chen, Ling
    Keating, Nancy L.
    del Carmen, Marcela G.
    Yang, Junhua
    Seagle, Brandon-Luke L.
    Alexander, Amy
    Barber, Emma L.
    Rice, Laurel W.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Kocherginsky, Masha
    Shahabi, Shohreh
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (20): : 1905 - 1914
  • [49] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER TREATED BY RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY
    SEVIN, BU
    NADJI, M
    LAMPE, B
    LU, Y
    HILSENBECK, S
    KOECHLI, OR
    AVERETTE, HE
    CANCER, 1995, 76 (10) : 1978 - 1986
  • [50] Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation
    Bansal, Nisha
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Burke, William M.
    Deutsch, Israel
    Wright, Jason D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (05) : 485.e1 - 485.e9