Does status stability benefit or hurt team creativity? the roles of status legitimacy and team conflict

被引:0
|
作者
Luo, Shiwen [1 ]
Wang, Jie [2 ]
Xie, Zaiyang [3 ]
Kin Tong, David Yoon [4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Financial Coll, Sch Int Business, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Business & Tourism Inst, Hangzhou Vocat & Tech Coll, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
[4] Multimedia Univ, Fac Business, Jalan Ayer Keroh Lama, Melaka 75450, Malaysia
关键词
Status stability; Relationship conflict; Task conflict; Status legitimacy; Team creativity; TASK CONFLICT; POWER DISPARITY; PIVOTAL ROLE; HIERARCHY; HELP; DIFFERENTIATION; PREFERENCES; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; INEQUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-023-04332-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Status stability, which refers to the stability of team members' relative status levels, has a profound effect on team effectiveness, but this effect may be either constructive or destructive; the literature has failed to reach consensus on this topic. To reconcile two contradictory views based on differentiating between different types of conflict, we constructed a comprehensive theoretical model of the mechanism underlying the effect of status stability; this model features relationship conflict and task conflict as mediators, status legitimacy as a moderator, and team creativity as an outcome variable. We also proposed four hypotheses on the basis of theoretical analysis. In this study, we used SPSS 23.0, AMOS 24.0 and R software to conduct empirical analysis and testing of 369 valid questionnaires collected from 83 teams using a two-stage measurement method. The results revealed that status stability negatively affects team creativity via task conflict and positively affects team creativity via relationship conflict. However, under the influence of status legitimacy, the negative effect is restrained, while the positive effect is enhanced. This study thus expands the research on the process mechanism and boundary conditions associated with status stability, and can serve as a useful reference for the design of the status structure of modern enterprises.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:942 / 953
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Is relationship conflict totally detrimental to team creativity?: Mediating role of team learning and moderating role of transformational leadership
    Zhongjun Ye
    Hefu Liu
    Jibao Gu
    Jin Yang
    Current Psychology, 2022, 41 : 6154 - 6165
  • [42] Is relationship conflict totally detrimental to team creativity?: Mediating role of team learning and moderating role of transformational leadership
    Ye, Zhongjun
    Liu, Hefu
    Gu, Jibao
    Yang, Jin
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 41 (09) : 6154 - 6165
  • [43] Differentiated transformational leadership, conflict and team creativity: an experimental study in China
    Dai, Peihua
    Feng, Mingming
    Wang, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2022, 17 (07) : 1679 - 1699
  • [44] Team conflict in ICT-rich environments: Roles of technologies in conflict management
    Correia, Ana-Paula
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (01) : 18 - 35
  • [45] Present status of Indonesia HTR team activities
    Lasman, AN
    Arbie, B
    HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS COOLED REACTOR APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS, 1998, : 235 - 240
  • [46] Does cloud computing improve team performance and employees' creativity?
    Zou, Jing
    Jian, Cheng
    KYBERNETES, 2022, 51 (02) : 582 - 601
  • [47] STATUS CONGRUENCE AS IT RELATES TO TEAM TEACHER SATISFACTION
    ARIKADO, MS
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 1976, 14 (01): : 70 - 78
  • [48] SURVEY OF STATUS OF TEAM PHYSICIANS IN UNITED STATES
    不详
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1963, 184 (12): : 981 - &
  • [49] STATUS PROBLEMS IN THE MENTAL-HEALTH TEAM
    BLACKMAN, S
    SILBERSTEIN, RM
    GOLDSTEIN, KM
    MENTAL HYGIENE, 1965, 49 (04) : 577 - 580
  • [50] Images of status and performance in building team occupations
    Faulkner, A.C.
    Day, A.K.
    Construction Management and Economics, 1986, 4 (03) : 245 - 260