Optimization of Transspinal Stimulation Applications for Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury: Scoping Review

被引:12
|
作者
Rehman, Muhammad Uzair [1 ,2 ]
Sneed, Dustin [3 ]
Sutor, Tommy W. [1 ]
Hoenig, Helen [4 ,5 ]
Gorgey, Ashraf S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Med Ctr, Spinal Cord Injury & Disorders, Richmond, VA 23249 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[4] Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, Phys Med & Rehabil Serv, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Geriatr Div, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
transspinal stimulation; transcutaneous; motor outcomes; spinal cord; TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; ACTIVATION; PATTERN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12030854
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition that can significantly affect an individual's life, causing paralysis, autonomic dysreflexia, and chronic pain. Transspinal stimulation (TSS) is a non-invasive form of neuromodulation that activates the underlying neural circuitries of the spinal cord. Application of TSS can be performed through multiple stimulation protocols, which may vary in the electrodes' size or position as well as stimulation parameters, and which may influence the response of motor functions to the stimulation. Due to the novelty of TSS, it is beneficial to summarize the available evidence to identify the range of parameters that may provide the best outcomes for motor response. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies examining the effects of TSS on limb motor function. A literature search yielded 34 studies for analysis, in which electrode placement and stimulation parameters varied considerably. The stimulation protocols from each study and their impact on limb motor function were summarized. Electrode placement was variable based on the targeted limb. Studies for the upper limbs targeted the cervical enlargement with anatomical placement of the cathode over the cervical vertebral region. In lower-limb studies, the cathode(s) were placed over the thoracic and lumbar vertebral regions, to target the lumbar enlargement. The effects of carrier frequency were inconclusive across the studies. Multisite cathodal placements yielded favorable motor response results compared to single-site placement. This review briefly summarized the current mechanistic evidence of the effect of TSS on motor response after SCI. Our findings indicate that optimization of stimulation parameters will require future randomized controlled studies to independently assess the effects of different stimulation parameters under controlled circumstances.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A review of the adaptability and recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury
    Barbeau, H
    Fung, J
    Leroux, A
    Ladouceur, A
    SPINAL CORD TRAUMA: REGENERATION, NEURAL REPAIR AND FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY, 2002, 137 : 9 - 25
  • [32] Cervical Spinal Stimulation and Respiratory Recovery after Upper Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
    Dale, Erica Arden
    Zhong, Hui
    Edgerton, V. Reggie
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2016, 30
  • [33] INJURY PATTERN EFFECT ON MOTOR RECOVERY AFTER TRAUMATIC SPINAL-CORD INJURY
    WATERS, RL
    SIE, I
    ADKINS, RH
    YAKURA, JS
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (05): : 440 - 443
  • [34] Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review
    Cesar Marquez-Chin
    Milos R. Popovic
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 19
  • [35] Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review
    Marquez-Chin, Cesar
    Popovic, Milos R.
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [36] Spinal cord imaging markers and recovery of standing with epidural stimulation in individuals with clinically motor complete spinal cord injury
    Smith, Andrew C.
    Angeli, Claudia A.
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Weber, Kenneth A., II
    Bert, Robert J.
    Negahdar, Mohammadjavad
    Mesbah, Samineh
    Boakye, Maxwell
    Harkema, Susan J.
    Rejc, Enrico
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 240 (01) : 279 - 288
  • [37] Spinal cord imaging markers and recovery of standing with epidural stimulation in individuals with clinically motor complete spinal cord injury
    Andrew C. Smith
    Claudia A. Angeli
    Beatrice Ugiliweneza
    Kenneth A. Weber
    Robert J. Bert
    Mohammadjavad Negahdar
    Samineh Mesbah
    Maxwell Boakye
    Susan J. Harkema
    Enrico Rejc
    Experimental Brain Research, 2022, 240 : 279 - 288
  • [38] The effects of epidural stimulation on individuals living with spinal cord injury or disease: a scoping review
    Rademeyer, Hope Jervis
    Gauthier, Cindy
    Masani, Kei
    Pakosh, Maureen
    Musselman, Kristin E.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2021, 26 (05) : 344 - 369
  • [39] Predictors of volitional motor recovery with epidural stimulation in Individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
    Mesbah, Samineh
    Ball, Tyler
    Angeli, Claudia
    Rejc, Enrico
    Dietz, Nicholas
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Harkema, Susan
    Boakye, Maxwell
    BRAIN, 2021, 144 (02) : 420 - 433
  • [40] Predictors of volitional motor recovery with epidural stimulation in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury
    Mesbah, Samineh
    Ball, Tyler
    Angeli, Claudia
    Rejc, Enrico
    Dietz, Nicholas
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Harkema, Susan
    Boakye, Maxwell
    BRAIN, 2021, 144 : 420 - 433