Co-production of social innovations and enabling ecosystems for social enterprises

被引:2
|
作者
Perikangas, Sofi [1 ]
Kostilainen, Harri [2 ]
Kainulainen, Sakari [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vaasa, Sch Management, Vaasa, Finland
[2] Diacon Univ Appl Sci, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Social enterprise; Coproduction; Social innovation; Ecosystem; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1108/IJPSM-04-2023-0111
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this article is to show (1) how social innovations are created through co-production in social enterprises in Finland and (2) how enabling ecosystems for the creation of social innovations can be enhanced by the government.Design/methodology/approachThis study is a descriptive case study. The data comprises focus group interviews that were conducted during a research project in Finland in 2022. The interviewees represented different social enterprises, other non-profit organisations and national funding institutions.FindingsSocial enterprises create social innovations in Finland through co-production, where service innovation processes, activism and networking are central. Also, to build an enabling ecosystem, government must base the system upon certain elements: enabling characteristics of the stakeholders, co-production methods and tools and initiatives by the government.Originality/valueThe authors address an important challenge that social enterprises struggle with: The position of social enterprises in Finland is weak and entrepreneurs experience prejudice from both the direction of "traditional" businesses and the government which often does not recognise social enterprise as a potential partner for public service delivery. Nonetheless, social enterprises create public value by contributing to the co-production of public services. They work in interorganisational networks by nature and can succeed where the traditional public organisations and private businesses fail.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 369
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Debate: Co-production can contribute to research impact in the social sciences
    Armstrong, Fiona
    Alsop, Adrian
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (04) : 208 - 210
  • [32] Co-production in integrated health and social care programmes: a pragmatic model
    Kaehne, Axel
    Beacham, Andrea
    Feather, Julie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2018, 26 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [33] Exploring Interactions in the Co-Production of Social Care Services with Vulnerable Citizens
    Gheduzzi, Eleonora
    Barello, Serena
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    Masella, Cristina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2024,
  • [34] Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge
    Beresford, Peter
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 3
  • [35] Co-production of an institution: Montserrat Volcano Observatory and social dependence on science
    Donovan, Amy R.
    Bravo, Michael
    Oppenheimer, Clive
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 40 (02) : 171 - 186
  • [36] A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey
    Voorberg, W. H.
    Bekkers, V. J. J. M.
    Tummers, L. G.
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 17 (09) : 1333 - 1357
  • [37] Social Economy and Home Care Services in Quebec: Co-Production or Co-Construction?
    Jette, Christian
    Vaillancourt, Yves
    [J]. VOLUNTAS, 2011, 22 (01): : 48 - 69
  • [38] Employment Discrimination Law and Industrial Psychology: Social Science as Social Authority and the Co-Production of Law and Science
    Stryker, Robin
    Docka-Filipek, Danielle
    Wald, Pamela
    [J]. LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, 2012, 37 (04): : 777 - 814
  • [39] Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries
    Hojnik, Barbara Bradac
    Crnogaj, Katja
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [40] Social Economy and Home Care Services in Quebec: Co-Production or Co-Construction?
    Christian Jetté
    Yves Vaillancourt
    [J]. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2011, 22 : 48 - 69