Expecting the unexpected: a review of learning under uncertainty across development

被引:7
|
作者
Topel, Selin [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Ili [1 ,2 ]
Sleutels, Jan [1 ,3 ]
van Steenbergen, Henk [1 ,2 ]
de Bruijn, Ellen R. A. [1 ,2 ]
van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Psychol, Wassenaarseweg 52, NL-2333 AK Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Inst Brain & Cognit, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Inst Philosophy, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Adolescence; Uncertainty; Volatility; Stochasticity; Learning; Decision-making; DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL REORIENTATION; PREDICTION ERROR; ADOLESCENT BRAIN; PEER INFLUENCE; REWARD; BEHAVIOR; ANXIETY; NOISE; RISK;
D O I
10.3758/s13415-023-01098-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many of our decisions take place under uncertainty. To successfully navigate the environment, individuals need to estimate the degree of uncertainty and adapt their behaviors accordingly by learning from experiences. However, uncertainty is a broad construct and distinct types of uncertainty may differentially influence our learning. We provide a semi-systematic review to illustrate cognitive and neurobiological processes involved in learning under two types of uncertainty: learning in environments with stochastic outcomes, and with volatile outcomes. We specifically reviewed studies (N = 26 studies) that included an adolescent population, because adolescence is a period in life characterized by heightened exploration and learning, as well as heightened uncertainty due to experiencing many new, often social, environments. Until now, reviews have not comprehensively compared learning under distinct types of uncertainties in this age range. Our main findings show that although the overall developmental patterns were mixed, most studies indicate that learning from stochastic outcomes, as indicated by increased accuracy in performance, improved with age. We also found that adolescents tended to have an advantage compared with adults and children when learning from volatile outcomes. We discuss potential mechanisms explaining these age-related differences and conclude by outlining future research directions.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 738
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Word learning under infinite uncertainty
    Blythe, Richard A.
    Smith, Andrew D. M.
    Smith, Kenny
    COGNITION, 2016, 151 : 18 - 27
  • [32] Learning-by-Doing under Uncertainty
    Alvarez F.
    Amman H.
    Computational Economics, 1999, 14 (3) : 255 - 262
  • [33] Metacognition and learning transfer under uncertainty
    Al-Moteri, Modi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION SCHOLARSHIP, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [34] Flexible structure learning under uncertainty
    Wang, Rui
    Gates, Vael
    Shen, Yuan
    Tino, Peter
    Kourtzi, Zoe
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [35] Reinforcement Learning Under Moral Uncertainty
    Ecoffet, Adrien
    Lehman, Joel
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 139, 2021, 139
  • [36] Expecting social punishment facilitates control over a decision under uncertainty by recruiting medial prefrontal cortex
    Kim, Jaejoong
    Jeong, Bumseok
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 15 (11) : 1260 - 1270
  • [37] Review-based recommendation under preference uncertainty: An asymmetric deep learning framework
    Xiong, Yingqiu
    Liu, Yezheng
    Qian, Yang
    Jiang, Yuanchun
    Chai, Yidong
    Ling, Haifeng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (03) : 1044 - 1057
  • [38] Facility location under uncertainty: a review
    Snyder, LV
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2006, 38 (07) : 537 - 554
  • [39] Book review: Investment Under Uncertainty
    Resources Policy, 1996, 22 (03):
  • [40] Interference between geothermal doublets across a fault under subsurface uncertainty; implications for field development and regulation
    Daniilidis, Alexandros
    Nick, Hamidreza M.
    Bruhn, David F.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2021, 91