Nasal endoscopy-guided primary nasolacrimal duct intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 4 years

被引:3
|
作者
Arici, Ceyhun [1 ]
Oto, Bilge Batu [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Med Fac, Dept Ophthalmol, TR-34098 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Bicanalicular intubation; Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; Nasal endoscopy; Silicone intubation; BICANALICULAR SILICONE INTUBATION; SUCCESS RATES;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-022-02503-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic guided primary bicanalicular intubation (BCI) for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in children older than 4 years. Methods A total of 40 eyes from 33 children (18 males, 15 females) with CNLDO who underwent bicanalicular intubation were evaluated. The type of CNLDO was determined by endonasal endoscopic visualisation. The mean silicone tube removal time was 4.3 +/- 0.9 months (ranging from 3 to 6 months). The children were followed up for 6 months after the removal of tubes. Therapeutic success was defined as the normal result of the fluorescein dye disappearance test and complete resolution of previous lacrimal symptoms and signs. Results The median age was 80 [48] (range 48-156) months. Treatment success was achieved in 32 of 40 eyes (80.0%). A statistically significant correlation was observed between the age and success rate (p = 0.006). The success rate was lower in older children. Membranous type of CNLDO was observed in 47.5% (19/40) of the cases. The median age of patients with a membranous and complex type of CNLDO were 60 [30] months and 96 [53] months, respectively. Surgical success was 100% in the membranous type of CNLDO and 61.9% in the complex CNLDO group. Conclusions Primary BCI using nasal endoscopic visualisation has a favourably high success rate for treating CNLDO in children aged 4 to 13 years. Treatment success was found to be related to both the type of CNLDO and age.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1011
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Probing and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation under nasal endoscopy in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
    Yagci, A
    Karci, B
    Ergezen, F
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 16 (01): : 58 - 61
  • [12] CONGENITAL NASOLACRIMAL DUCT CYSTS WITH NASAL OBSTRUCTION
    CALCATERRA, VE
    ANNINO, DJ
    CARTER, BL
    WOOG, JJ
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1995, 113 (04) : 481 - 484
  • [13] SILICONE INTUBATION FOR OBSTRUCTION OF THE NASOLACRIMAL DUCT IN CHILDREN
    DORTZBACH, RK
    FRANCE, TD
    KUSHNER, BJ
    GONNERING, RS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1982, 94 (05) : 585 - 590
  • [14] Nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children: Outcome of intubation
    Lim, CS
    Martin, F
    Beckenham, T
    Cumming, RG
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2004, 8 (05): : 466 - 472
  • [15] Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with probing in children younger than 4 years
    Repka, Michael X.
    Chandler, Danielle L.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (03) : 577 - 584
  • [16] Bony nasolacrimal duct size and outcomes of nasolacrimal silicone intubation for incomplete primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction
    Yang, Min Kyu
    Sa, Ho-Seok
    Kim, Namju
    Kim, Jeong Hun
    Choung, Hokyung
    Khwarg, Sang In
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [17] NASOLACRIMAL PROBING AND INTUBATION FOR CHILDREN WITH NASOLACRIMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION AND HISTORY OF DACRYOCYSTITIS
    Shinder, Roman
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2012, 16 (05): : 492 - 492
  • [18] Balloon dacryocystoplasty as the primary treatment in older children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
    Chen, PL
    Hsiao, CH
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2005, 9 (06): : 546 - 549
  • [19] Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
    Yazici, Bulent
    Akarsu, Cengiz
    Salkaya, Muhsin
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2006, 10 (04): : 328 - 332
  • [20] Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children
    Honavar, SG
    Prakash, VE
    Rao, GN
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 130 (01) : 42 - 48