Health and Election Outcomes: Evidence from the 2020 US Presidential Election

被引:2
|
作者
Panagopoulos, Costas [1 ]
Weinschenk, Aaron C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
mental health; health and politics; health and elections; health; 2020 presidential election; SOCIAL IDENTITY THREAT; SELF-RATED HEALTH; MENTAL-HEALTH; RESPONSES; STRESS; VOTE; SES;
D O I
10.1177/10659129221113256
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Recent research indicates that political developments and events can have important implications for health. In this study, we use data from a large, nationally representative survey (N = 1750) fielded in December 2020 to understand how the 2020 Presidential Election impacted self-reported health ratings. Several important findings emerge. First, many Americans report that their mental (14%) and general (6%) health has worsened compared to before the 2020 presidential election; similar number of Americans report improvements to their mental (15%) and general (8%) health. Second, those who voted for Trump and who disagree that Biden won the election are significantly less likely than their counterparts to report better mental, but not general, health compared to before the 2020 election. These relationships persist even in the context of a wide range of controls, including demographics, political predispositions, and perceptions of polarization.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:712 / 724
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] US election 2020: research and health institutions
    Jaffe, Susan
    LANCET, 2020, 396 (10259): : 1320 - 1321
  • [42] Competence ratings in US predict presidential election outcomes in Bulgaria
    Sussman, Abigail B.
    Petkova, Kristina
    Todorov, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 49 (04) : 771 - 775
  • [43] Using state polls to forecast US Presidential election outcomes
    Soumbatiants, Souren
    Chappell, Henry W., Jr.
    Johnson, Eric
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 2006, 127 (1-2) : 207 - 223
  • [44] Public attitudes toward polls: Evidence from the 2000 US Presidential election
    Price, Vincent
    Stroud, Natalie Jomini
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2006, 18 (04) : 393 - 421
  • [45] Taiwan's 2020 Presidential, Vice Presidential and Legislative Election: Testing Election Theories
    Copper, John F.
    EAST ASIAN POLICY, 2020, 12 (02) : 45 - 56
  • [46] The Activation of Prejudice and Presidential Voting: Panel Evidence from the 2016 US Election
    Hopkins, Daniel J.
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 43 (02) : 663 - 686
  • [47] Impact of Regulations on Firm Value: Evidence from the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Kundu, Santanu
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2023, 59 (04) : 1659 - 1691
  • [48] M&As and political uncertainty: Evidence from the 2016 US presidential election
    Chahine, Salim
    Dbouk, Wassim
    El-Helaly, Moataz
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2021, 54
  • [49] Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election
    Lench, Heather C.
    Fernandez, Leslie
    Reed, Noah
    Raibley, Emily
    Levine, Linda J.
    Salsedo, Kiki
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2024,
  • [50] A Mixed Model for Identifying Fake News in Tweets from the 2020 US Presidential Election
    Bernardes, Vitor
    Figueira, Alvaro
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (WEBIST), 2021, : 307 - 315