A randomized trial of eribulin monotherapy versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Liu, B. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, L. [1 ,2 ]
Ran, J. [2 ]
Xie, N. [1 ,2 ]
Li, J. [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, H. [1 ]
Yang, X. [1 ,2 ]
Tian, C. [1 ]
Wu, H. [1 ,2 ]
Lu, J. [1 ,2 ]
Gao, J. [1 ,2 ]
Hu, X. [1 ,2 ]
Cao, M. [1 ]
Shui, Z. [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Z. -y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ouyang, Q. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Hunan Canc Hosp, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Breast Canc Med Oncol,Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Heath, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Cent South Univ, Hunan Canc Hosp, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Breast Canc Med Oncol,Xiangya Sch Med, 283,Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410000, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
breast cancer; eribulin; anlotinib; efficacy; safety; biomarker; CHEMOTHERAPY; EFFICACY; SAFETY; ANTHRACYCLINE; ANGIOGENESIS; RAMUCIRUMAB; MULTICENTER; BEVACIZUMAB; COMBINATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101563
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Eribulin mesylate is a novel, nontaxane, microtubule dynamics inhibitor. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of eribulin versus eribulin plus the oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.Patients and methods: In this single-center, open-label, phase II clinical study (NCT05206656) conducted in a Chinese hospital, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline- or taxane-based chemotherapy were randomized (1 : 1) to receive eribulin alone or in combination with anlotinib. The primary efficacy endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).Results: From June 2020 to April 2022, a total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to either eribulin monotherapy or eribulin plus anlotinib combination therapy, with 40 patients in each group. The data cut-off was 10 August 2022. The median PFS was 3.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-5.5 months] for eribulin and 5.1 months (95% CI 4.5-6.9 months) for eribulin plus anlotinib (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98; P = 0.04). The objective response rates were 32.5% versus 52.5% (P = 0.07), respectively, and disease control rates were 67.5% versus 92.5% (P = 0.01), respectively. Patients <50 years of age, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0, visceral metastasis, number of treatment lines of four or more, hormone receptor negative (triple-negative), and HER2 low expression appeared to benefit more from combined treatment. The most common adverse events in both groups were leukopenia (n = 28, 70.0%, patients in the eribulin monotherapy group versus n = 35, 87.5%, patients in the combination therapy group), aspartate aminotransferase elevations (n = 28, 70.0%, versus n = 35, 87.5%), neutropenia (n = 25, 62.5%, versus n = 31, 77.5%), and alanine aminotransferase elevations (n = 25, 62.5%, versus n = 30, 75.0%).Conclusion: Eribulin plus anlotinib can be considered an alternative treatment option for HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and toxicity of eribulin treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients
    Brems-Eskildsen, Anne Sofie
    Kristoffersen, Kristina Bak
    Linnet, Soren
    Lorincz, Tamas
    Langkjer, Sven Tyge
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2019, 58 (01) : 119 - 121
  • [32] Efficacy, safety and cost of eribulin in patients with metastatic breast cancer
    Paillard, Marie-Justine
    Curtit, Elsa
    Dobi, Erion
    Mansi, Laura
    Bazan, Fernando
    Villanueva, Cristian
    Chaigneau, Loic
    Montcuquet, Philippe
    Meneveau, Nathalie
    Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine
    Nerich, Virginie
    Pivot, Xavier
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2015, 102 (09) : 737 - 748
  • [33] Safety of eribulin in Korean patients with metastatic breast cancer.
    Park, Yeon Hee
    Im, Young-Hyuck
    Lee, Keun-Seok
    Park, In Hae
    Sohn, Joohyuk
    Lee, Soohyeon
    Kim, Tae Yong
    Im, Seock-Ah
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Kim, Se Hyun
    Lee, Soo Jung
    Koh, Su-Jin
    Lee, Ki Hyeong
    Choi, Yoon Ji
    Cho, Eun Kyung
    Lee, Suee
    Kang, Seok Yun
    Seo, Jae Hong
    Kim, Sung-Bae
    Jung, Kyung Hae
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [34] Eribulin Suppresses New Metastases in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Fujii, Takaaki
    Tokuda, Shoko
    Nakazawa, Yuko
    Kurozumi, Sasagu
    Obayashi, Sayaka
    Yajima, Reina
    Shirabe, Ken
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (02): : 917 - 921
  • [35] The Place for Eribulin in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
    William J. Gradishar
    Current Oncology Reports, 2011, 13 : 11 - 16
  • [36] The Place for Eribulin in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Gradishar, William J.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2011, 13 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [37] The safety of eribulin for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer
    Manuel Perez-Garcia, Jose
    Cortes, Javier
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 18 (05) : 347 - 355
  • [38] Effectiveness and healthcare costs of eribulin versus capecitabine among metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan
    Lin, Yu-Ju
    Kuo, Chun-Nan
    Ko, Yu
    BREAST, 2021, 57 : 18 - 24
  • [39] Safety and efficacy of eribulin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: A phase IV study in India
    Choudhary, Vaibhav
    Satheesh, C. T.
    Bose, Chinmoy K.
    Rajan, Shiv
    Prakash, Ss
    Desai, Chirag
    Lin, Xiao
    Patil, Balaji
    Chaudhari, Sameer
    Gupta, Sudeep
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S537 - S537
  • [40] Dose Reduction versus Dose-interval Prolongation in Eribulin Mesilate Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Sasaki, Toshinori
    Oshima, Yumiko
    Mishima, Etsuko
    Ban, Akiko
    Katsuragawa, Kenji
    Nagamatsu, Hidetsugu
    Yoshioka, Yuki
    Tsukiyama, Ikuto
    Hisada, Tatsuya
    Itakura, Yukari
    Mizutani, Mitsuhiro
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2016, 136 (07): : 1023 - 1029