A randomized trial of eribulin monotherapy versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Liu, B. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, L. [1 ,2 ]
Ran, J. [2 ]
Xie, N. [1 ,2 ]
Li, J. [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, H. [1 ]
Yang, X. [1 ,2 ]
Tian, C. [1 ]
Wu, H. [1 ,2 ]
Lu, J. [1 ,2 ]
Gao, J. [1 ,2 ]
Hu, X. [1 ,2 ]
Cao, M. [1 ]
Shui, Z. [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Z. -y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ouyang, Q. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Hunan Canc Hosp, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Breast Canc Med Oncol,Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Heath, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Cent South Univ, Hunan Canc Hosp, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Breast Canc Med Oncol,Xiangya Sch Med, 283,Tongzipo Rd, Changsha 410000, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
breast cancer; eribulin; anlotinib; efficacy; safety; biomarker; CHEMOTHERAPY; EFFICACY; SAFETY; ANTHRACYCLINE; ANGIOGENESIS; RAMUCIRUMAB; MULTICENTER; BEVACIZUMAB; COMBINATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101563
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Eribulin mesylate is a novel, nontaxane, microtubule dynamics inhibitor. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of eribulin versus eribulin plus the oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.Patients and methods: In this single-center, open-label, phase II clinical study (NCT05206656) conducted in a Chinese hospital, patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline- or taxane-based chemotherapy were randomized (1 : 1) to receive eribulin alone or in combination with anlotinib. The primary efficacy endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).Results: From June 2020 to April 2022, a total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to either eribulin monotherapy or eribulin plus anlotinib combination therapy, with 40 patients in each group. The data cut-off was 10 August 2022. The median PFS was 3.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-5.5 months] for eribulin and 5.1 months (95% CI 4.5-6.9 months) for eribulin plus anlotinib (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98; P = 0.04). The objective response rates were 32.5% versus 52.5% (P = 0.07), respectively, and disease control rates were 67.5% versus 92.5% (P = 0.01), respectively. Patients <50 years of age, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0, visceral metastasis, number of treatment lines of four or more, hormone receptor negative (triple-negative), and HER2 low expression appeared to benefit more from combined treatment. The most common adverse events in both groups were leukopenia (n = 28, 70.0%, patients in the eribulin monotherapy group versus n = 35, 87.5%, patients in the combination therapy group), aspartate aminotransferase elevations (n = 28, 70.0%, versus n = 35, 87.5%), neutropenia (n = 25, 62.5%, versus n = 31, 77.5%), and alanine aminotransferase elevations (n = 25, 62.5%, versus n = 30, 75.0%).Conclusion: Eribulin plus anlotinib can be considered an alternative treatment option for HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Eribulin mesylate versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Results of a phase II study.
    Liu, Liping
    Hu, Zhe-Yu
    Xie, Ning
    Yang, Xiaohong
    Xiao, Huawu
    Li, Jing
    Tian, Can
    Wu, Hui
    Lu, Jun
    Gao, Jianxiang
    Hu, Xuming
    Cao, Min
    Shui, Zhengrong
    Liu, Bingliang
    Ouyang, Quchang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [2] A multicenter, randomized, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of eribulin monotherapy and eribulin plus endocrine therapy in locally-recurrent or metastatic breast cancer patients after progression on endocrine therapy (REVERT study)
    Manuel Perez-Garcia, Jose
    Cortes Salgado, Alfonso
    Lopez Miranda, Elena
    Anton, Antonio
    Sanchez Rovira, Pedro
    Castelo Fernandez, Beatriz
    Lopez Gonzalez, Ana
    Garau, Isabel
    Martinez, Alejandro
    Corbellas Aparicio, Miguel
    Del Barco, Sonia
    Sampayo, Miguel
    Riva, Francois
    Malfettone, Andrea
    Llombart-Cussac, Antonio
    Cortes, Javier
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [3] Eribulin mesilate versus vinorelbine in women with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: A randomised clinical trial
    Yuan, Peng
    Hu, Xichun
    Sun, Tao
    Li, Wei
    Zhang, Qingyuan
    Cui, Shude
    Cheng, Ying
    Ouyang, Quchang
    Wang, Xiaojia
    Chen, Zhendong
    Hiraiwa, Masahide
    Saito, Kenichi
    Funasaka, Setsuo
    Xu, Binghe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 112 : 57 - 65
  • [4] Balixafortide (a CXCR4 antagonist) plus eribulin versus eribulin alone in patients with HER2 negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: An international, randomized, phase 3 trial (FORTRESS)
    Kaufman, Peter
    Martin, Miguel
    Mayer, Ingrid
    Vahdat, Linda
    Pernas, Sonia
    Schmid, Peter
    McArthur, Heather
    Dent, Rebecca
    Rugo, Hope S.
    Barrios, Carlos
    Bobirca, Alexandra
    Ringeisen, Francois
    Schmitter, Daniela
    Cortes, Javier
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)
  • [5] International, phase 3 trial: Balixafortide (a CXCR4 antagonist) plus eribulin versus eribulin alone in patients with HER2 negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (FORTRESS) international, phase 3 trial: Balixafortide (a CXCR4 antagonist) plus eribulin versus eribulin alone in patients with HER2 negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (FORTRESS)
    Kaufmann, Peter
    Cortes, Javier
    Martin, Miguel
    Mayer, Ingrid
    Vahdat, Linda
    Pernas, Sonia
    Schmid, Peter
    McArthur, Heather
    Dent, Rebecca
    Rugo, Hope
    Barrios, Carlos
    Barker, Debra
    Romagnoli, Barbara
    Bobirca, Alexandra
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [6] Ramucirumab With Eribulin Versus Eribulin in Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracycline and Taxane Therapy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase II Study
    Yardley, Denise A.
    Reeves, James
    Dees, E. Claire
    Osborne, Cynthia
    Pau, Devchand
    Ademuyiwa, Foluso
    Soliman, Hatem
    Guthrie, Troy
    Andersen, Jay
    Krekow, Lea
    Choksi, Janak
    Daniel, Brooke
    Danso, Michael
    Favret, Anne
    Oommen, Sanjay
    Brufsky, Adam
    Bromund, Jane L.
    Lin, Yong
    Ibrahim, Ayman B.
    Richards, Paul D.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2016, 16 (06) : 471 - 479
  • [7] Effects of dose modification of eribulin mesylate in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
    Faria, Claudio
    Li, Xuan
    Powers, Annette
    Vahdat, Linda T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (26)
  • [8] International phase III trial: Balixafortide (a CXCR4 antagonist) plus eribulin versus eribulin alone in patients with HER2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (FORTRESS)
    Kaufman, P. A.
    Martin, M.
    Mayer, I.
    Vahdat, L. T.
    Pernas Simon, S.
    Schmid, P.
    McArthur, H. L.
    Dent, R.
    Rugo, H. S.
    Barrios, C.
    Bobirca, A.
    Ringeisen, F.
    Cortes, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S394 - S395
  • [9] Eribulin in Recurrent/Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)
    Taha Sethjiwala
    Manikandan Dhanushkodi
    Venkatraman Radhakrishnan
    Jayachandran Perumal Kalaiarasi
    Nikita Mehra
    Archit Joshi
    Arun Kumar Rajan
    Gangothri Selvarajan
    Balasubramanian Ananthi
    Priya Iyer
    Geetha Senguttuvan
    Bharathi Srilatha
    Arvind Krishnamurthy
    Sridevi Velusamy
    Selvaluxmy Ganesarajah
    Trivadi S. Ganesan
    Tenali Gnana Sagar
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2019, 17
  • [10] Eribulin in Recurrent/Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)
    Sethjiwala, Taha
    Dhanushkodi, Manikandan
    Radhakrishnan, Venkatraman
    Kalaiarasi, Jayachandran Perumal
    Mehra, Nikita
    Joshi, Archit
    Rajan, Arun Kumar
    Selvarajan, Gangothri
    Ananthi, Balasubramanian
    Iyer, Priya
    Senguttuvan, Geetha
    Srilatha, Bharathi
    Krishnamurthy, Arvind
    Velusamy, Sridevi
    Ganesarajah, Selvaluxmy
    Ganesan, Trivadi S.
    Sagar, Tenali Gnana
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (03)