Genome mining for anti-CRISPR operons using machine learning

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Bowen [1 ]
Khatri, Minal [2 ]
Zheng, Jinfang [1 ]
Deogun, Jitender [2 ]
Yin, Yanbin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska Food Hlth Ctr, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Lincoln, NE 68508 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Sch Comp, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
基金
美国农业部; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SERVER;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btad309
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: Encoded by (pro-)viruses, anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins inhibit the CRISPR-Cas immune system of their prokaryotic hosts. As a result, Acr proteins can be employed to develop more controllable CRISPR-Cas genome editing tools. Recent studies revealed that known acr genes often coexist with other acr genes and with phage structural genes within the same operon. For example, we found that 47 of 98 known acr genes (or their homologs) co-exist in the same operons. None of the current Acr prediction tools have considered this important genomic context feature. We have developed a new software tool AOminer to facilitate the improved discovery of new Acrs by fully exploiting the genomic context of known acr genes and their homologs.Results: AOminer is the first machine learning based tool focused on the discovery of Acr operons (AOs). A two-state HMM (hidden Markov model) was trained to learn the conserved genomic context of operons that contain known acr genes or their homologs, and the learnt features could distinguish AOs and non-AOs. AOminer allows automated mining for potential AOs from query genomes or operons. AOminer outperformed all existing Acr prediction tools with an accuracy = 0.85. AOminer will facilitate the discovery of novel anti-CRISPR operons.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phage-Encoded Anti-CRISPR Defenses
    Stanley, Sabrina Y.
    Maxwell, Karen L.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, VOL 52, 2018, 52 : 445 - +
  • [42] Exploitation of the Cooperative Behaviors of Anti-CRISPR Phages
    Chevallereau, Anne
    Meaden, Sean
    Fradet, Olivier
    Landsberger, Mariann
    Maestri, Alice
    Biswas, Ambarish
    Gandon, Sylvain
    van Houte, Stineke
    Westra, Edze R.
    CELL HOST & MICROBE, 2020, 27 (02) : 189 - +
  • [43] In the Anti-CRISPR Jungle, Only the Weak Thrive?
    Croteau, Felix R.
    Hynes, Alexander P.
    CELL HOST & MICROBE, 2020, 27 (02) : 157 - 159
  • [44] In Silico Approaches for Prediction of Anti-CRISPR Proteins
    Makarova, Kira S.
    Wolf, Yuri I.
    Koonin, Eugene, V
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2023, 435 (07)
  • [45] Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR-Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins
    Bondy-Denomy, Joseph
    Garcia, Bianca
    Strum, Scott
    Du, Mingjian
    Rollins, MaryClare F.
    Hidalgo-Reyes, Yurima
    Wiedenheft, Blake
    Maxwell, Karen L.
    Davidson, Alan R.
    NATURE, 2015, 526 (7571) : 136 - +
  • [46] Molecular basis of transcriptional repression of anti-CRISPR by anti-CRISPR-associated 2
    Lee, So Yeon
    Kim, Gi Eob
    Park, Hyun Ho
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 78 : 59 - 68
  • [47] Anti-CRISPR Phages Cooperate to Overcome CRISPR-Cas Immunity
    Landsberger, Mariann
    Gandon, Sylvain
    Meaden, Sean
    Rollie, Clare
    Chevallereau, Anne
    Chabas, Helene
    Buckling, Angus
    Westra, Edze R.
    van Houte, Stineke
    CELL, 2018, 174 (04) : 908 - +
  • [48] AcaFinder: Genome Mining for Anti-CRISPR-Associated Genes
    Yang, Bowen
    Zheng, Jinfang
    Yin, Yanbin
    MSYSTEMS, 2022, 7 (06)
  • [49] Mobile element warfare via CRISPR and anti-CRISPR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Leon, Lina M.
    Park, Allyson E.
    Borges, Adair L.
    Zhang, Jenny Y.
    Bondy-Denomy, Joseph
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (04) : 2114 - 2125
  • [50] Analysis of Anti-CRISPR in relation to structurally similar proteins
    Ostapchuk, Nikita
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2022, 36