A comparison of two techniques of internal jugular vein cannulation: Landmark-guided technique versus ultrasound-guided technique

被引:0
|
作者
Davis, Josemine [1 ,6 ]
Dwivedi, Deepak [2 ]
Sawhney, Sadhan [3 ]
Rai, Amit [1 ]
Dua, Amit [4 ]
Singh, Satyen Kumar [5 ]
机构
[1] Command Hosp Western Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Chandigarh, India
[2] Command Hosp Eastern Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Kolkata, India
[3] Command Hosp Southern Command, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Pune, India
[4] Army Hosp R&R, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[5] Base Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Lucknow, India
[6] Command Hosp Western Command Chandimandir, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Panchkula, Haryana, India
关键词
Cannulation; central venous catheterization; jugular vein; landmark; ultrasonography; CENTRAL VENOUS CANNULATION; COMPLICATIONS; CATHETERIZATION; PLACEMENT; INSERTION; ARTERIAL; GUIDANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.4103/jmms.jmms_13_22
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: This study was designed to compare the overall success rates and complications of two techniques of internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization, namely the landmark (LM)-based technique and ultrasound (US)-guided technique in a heterogeneous Indian population at an Armed Forces Tertiary Care Hospital. Methods: Ninety consenting patients were assigned to two groups: LM and US groups. Patients with known coagulation abnormalities, body mass index > 30, infection at the insertion site, known vascular abnormalities, burn contractures, and other dermatologic conditions that precluded an LM technique were excluded. Central venous catheterizations during the code blue scenarios were excluded due to the emergent nature of the procedure. Three operators from the author group with requisite experience in LM and US techniques performed the 90 catheterizations. In LM group, a finder needle with a 2 ml syringe was used to aspirate venous blood from the IJV. A 16G needle was guided in the same direction as the finder needle till venous blood was aspirated, followed by guidewire insertion and cannulation. In the US group, a 6-12 MHz linear US probe was used to identify the IJV in real time and a 16G needle was used to access the IJV under US guidance in the cross-sectional view. Results: The overall success rate was 84.4% in LM group and 100% in US group (P = 0.0059). The first attempt success rate was similar in both groups (71.1% and 86.6%, P = 0.07). The overall complication rates in LM group were 20%, whereas complications in the US group were 2.2% (P = 0.0073). Notably, vascular complications occurred less frequently in US group with fewer arterial punctures and hematomas. Hemothorax and pneumothorax did not occur in any group. The mean cannulation time decreased by 69 s, i.e., from 276 s in the LM group to 207 s in the US group (P < 0.001). Conclusion: US-guided central venous catheter insertion to IJV improves the overall success rate and reduces cannulation time as compared to conventional LM-based technique.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of an ultrasound-guided technique versus a landmark-guided technique for internal jugular vein cannulation
    Dolu, Hasan
    Goksu, Sitki
    Sahin, Levent
    Ozen, Onder
    Eken, Levent
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2015, 29 (01) : 177 - 182
  • [2] Comparison of an ultrasound-guided technique versus a landmark-guided technique for internal jugular vein cannulation
    Hasan Dolu
    Sıtkı Goksu
    Levent Sahin
    Onder Ozen
    Levent Eken
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2015, 29 : 177 - 182
  • [3] INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CANNULATION: AN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED TECHNIQUE VERSUS A LANDMARK-GUIDED TECHNIQUE
    Turker, Gurkan
    Kaya, Fatma Nur
    Gurbet, Alp
    Aksu, Hale
    Erdogan, Cuneyt
    Atlas, Ahmet
    CLINICS, 2009, 64 (10) : 989 - 992
  • [4] INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CATHETERISATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED TECHNIQUE WITH LANDMARK-GUIDED TECHNIQUE
    Siddalingappa, Vijayanand
    Seshaiah, Chaya
    Reddy, Chandrashekhar Krishna
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (72): : 5296 - 5301
  • [5] Ultrasound-guided cannulation versus the landmark-guided technique for acute haemodialysis access
    Farrell, J
    Gellens, M
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 12 (06) : 1234 - 1237
  • [6] ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED CANNULATION OF THE INTERNAL JUGULAR-VEIN - A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON TO THE EXTERNAL LANDMARK-GUIDED TECHNIQUE
    DENYS, BG
    URETSKY, BF
    REDDY, PS
    CIRCULATION, 1993, 87 (05) : 1557 - 1562
  • [7] Simplified echo-guided internal jugular vein puncture: A comparison to the landmark-guided technique
    Hayashi, H
    Tsuzuku, M
    Amano, M
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (04): : SCA89 - SCA89
  • [8] STUDY ON COMPARISON BETWEEN LANDMARK GUIDED (BRINKMAN'S TECHNIQUE) AND ULTRASOUND GUIDED INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN CANNULATION
    Vinod, K.
    Walling, Sashi T.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (51): : 8894 - 8899
  • [9] Improvement of internal jugular vein cannulation using an ultrasound-guided technique
    Slama, M
    Novara, A
    Safavian, A
    Ossart, M
    Safar, M
    Fagon, JY
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 23 (08) : 916 - 919
  • [10] Improvement of internal jugular vein cannulation using an ultrasound-guided technique
    M. Slama
    A. Novara
    A. Safavian
    M. Ossart
    M. Safar
    J.-Y. Fagon
    Intensive Care Medicine, 1997, 23 : 916 - 919