Volumetric Outcomes of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Augmentation with a Xenogeneic Cross-Linked Collagen Scaffold: A Comparative Clinical Study

被引:2
|
作者
Tavelli, Lorenzo [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Barootchi, Shayan [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez, Maria Vera [1 ,3 ]
Meneghetti, Priscila Ceolin [1 ,4 ]
Mendonca, Gustavo [5 ]
Wang, Horn-Lay [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Ctr Clin Res & Evidence Synth Oral Tissue Regenera, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Med Infect & Immunity, Div Periodontol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Ponitif Univ Catol Rio Grande, Escola Ciencias Saude & Vida, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Biol & Mat Sci, Div Prosthodont, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Harvard Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Med Infect & Immunity, Div Periodontol, 188 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, 1011 N Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
关键词
MATRIX; SITES; RECONSTRUCTION; GRAFTS; BONE;
D O I
10.11607/prd.6058
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Performing soft tissue augmentation (STA) at implant sites to improve esthetics, patient satisfaction, and peri-implant health is common. Several soft tissue grafting materials can be used to increase soft tissue thickness at the second-stage surgery, including human dermal matrices and xenogeneic collagen scaffolds. This study assessed and compared the volumetric outcomes, from second-stage surgery to crown delivery, around implants that received STA with a xenogeneic cross-linked collagen scaffold (XCCS) vs nonaugmented implant sites. Thirty-one patients (31 implant sites) completed the study. Intraoral digital scans were taken at the second stage and prior to crown delivery, and the STL files were imported in an image-analysis software to assess volumetric changes. XCCS-augmented implants showed significantly greater volumetric changes compared to control sites, which showed volume loss. The mean thickness of the XCCS-augmented area was 0.73 mm. There was no difference in patient-reported esthetic evaluations between groups. STA with XCCS provided significantly greater volumetric outcomes compared to nonaugmented sites. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term behavior of the augmented peri-implant mucosa and the effects of STA on peri-implant health. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2023;43:415-422. doi: 10.11607/prd.6058
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 424
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study on Peri-Implant Hard and Soft Tissue with Angulated Branemark Implants
    Buchholz, Steffen
    Stelzel, Michael
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2010, 18 (02): : 123 - 131
  • [42] Peri-implant keratinized gingiva augmentation using xenogeneic collagen matrix and platelet-rich fibrin:A case report
    Chun-Yu Han
    De-Zhou Wang
    Jian-Fei Bai
    Lan-Lan Zhao
    Wen-Zhi Song
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2021, (34) : 10738 - 10745
  • [43] The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems - A comparative study in the dog
    Abrahamsson, I
    Berglundh, T
    Wennstrom, J
    Lindhe, J
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (03) : 212 - 219
  • [44] Peri-implant soft-tissue esthetic outcome after immediate implant placement in conjunction with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix or connective tissue graft: A randomized controlled clinical study
    Happe, Arndt
    Schmidt, Alexander
    Neugebauer, Joerg
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 34 (01) : 215 - 225
  • [45] Baseline selection for evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue changes: a clinical trial
    Zheng, Chaoling
    Wang, Shimin
    Ye, Hongqiang
    Liu, Yunsong
    Hu, Wenjie
    Zhou, Yongsheng
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (19)
  • [46] Comparative volumetric and clinical evaluation of peri-implant sulcular fluid and gingival crevicular fluid
    Bhardwaj, Smiti
    Prabhuji, Munivenkatappa Lakshmaiah Venkatesh
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 43 (05): : 233 - 242
  • [47] Connective tissue graft versus xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: a randomized-controlled clinical trial
    Igor Ashurko
    Svetlana Tarasenko
    Aleksandr Esayan
    Alexandr Kurkov
    Karen Mikaelyan
    Maxim Balyasin
    Anna Galyas
    Julia Kustova
    Silvio Taschieri
    Stefano Corbella
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 7191 - 7208
  • [48] Connective tissue graft versus xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: a randomized-controlled clinical trial
    Ashurko, Igor
    Tarasenko, Svetlana
    Esayan, Aleksandr
    Kurkov, Alexandr
    Mikaelyan, Karen
    Balyasin, Maxim
    Galyas, Anna
    Kustova, Julia
    Taschieri, Silvio
    Corbella, Stefano
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (12) : 7191 - 7208
  • [49] Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix to Augment Peri-implant Soft Tissue Thickness Compared with Autogenous Connective Tissue Graf: A Systems is Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
    Barootchi, Shayan
    Tavelli, Lorenzo
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (05) : 1053 - 1064
  • [50] The relationship of peri-implant soft tissue wound healing with implant cover screw design: Cross-sectional study
    Guney, Zeliha
    Karacaoglu, Fatma
    Baris, Emre
    Gezer, K. Gokalp
    Akkaya, M. Murat
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (02) : 299 - 308