共 50 条
Mortality reduces overyielding in mixed Scots pine and European beech stands along a precipitation gradient in Europe
被引:8
|作者:
Pretzsch, Hans
[1
,8
]
Heym, Michael
[1
,2
]
Hilmers, Torben
[1
]
Bravo-Oviedo, Andres
[3
]
Ahmed, Shamim
[1
]
Ammer, Christian
[4
,5
]
Avdagic, Admir
[6
]
Bielak, Kamil
[7
]
Bravo, Felipe
[8
]
Brazaitis, Gediminas
[9
]
Fabrika, Marek
[10
]
Hurt, Vaclav
[11
]
Kurylyak, Viktor
[12
]
Lof, Magnus
[7
,13
]
Pach, Maciej
[14
]
Ponette, Quentin
[15
]
Ruiz-Peinado, Ricardo
[16
]
Stojanovic, Dejan
[17
]
Svoboda, Miroslav
[18
]
Wolff, Barbara
[19
]
Zlatanov, Tzvetan
[20
]
del Rio, Miren
[16
]
机构:
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Forest Growth & Yield Sci, TUM Sch Life Sci, Dept Life Sci Syst, Hans Carl Von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[2] Bavarian State Inst Forestry LWF, Dept Silviculture & Mt Forest, Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[3] CSIC, Natl Museum Nat Sci, Dept Biogeog & Global Change, Serrano 115, Madrid 28006, Spain
[4] Univ Gottingen, Silviculture & Forest Ecol Temperate Zones, Busgenweg 1, Gottingen, Germany
[5] Univ Gottingen, Ctr Biodivers & Sustainable Landuse, Busgenweg 1, Gottingen, Germany
[6] Univ Sarajevo, Fac Forestry, Zagrebacka 20, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia & Herceg
[7] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, Inst Forest Sci, Dept Silviculture, Nowoursynowska 159-34, Warsaw, Poland
[8] Univ Valladolid, Sustainable Forest Management Res Inst iuFOR, Valladolid, Spain
[9] Vytautas Magnus Univ, Akad, Dept Forest Sci, Studentu 11, LT-53361 Kaunas Dist, Lithuania
[10] Tech Univ Zvolen, Fac Forestry, Dept Forest Resource Planning & Informat, T G Masaryka 24, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia
[11] Mendel Agr Univ Brno, Fac Forestry & Wood Sci, Brno, Czech Republic
[12] Ukrainian Natl Forestry Univ, Inst Forestry & Hort, Lvov, Ukraine
[13] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Southern Swedish Forest Res Ctr, Box 190, S-23422 Lomma, Sweden
[14] Agr Univ Krakow, Fac Forestry, Dept Ecol & Silviculture, Al 29 Listopada 46, PL-31425 Krakow, Poland
[15] UCLouvain Univ Catholique Louvain, Earth & Life Inst, Croix Sud 2 box L7 05-09, B-1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[16] CSIC, Inst Ciencias Forestales ICIFOR INIA, Ctra A Coruna km 7-5, Madrid 28040, Spain
[17] Univ Novi Sad, Inst Lowland Forestry & Environm, Antona Cehova 13, Novi Sad, Serbia
[18] Czech Univ Life Sci, Fac Forestry & Wood Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[19] Hsch Nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde HNEE, FG Waldinventur & Planung, Alfred Moller Str 1, D-16225 Eberswalde, Germany
[20] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Res, 2 Gagarin St, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria
关键词:
Mixed species stands;
Gross and net overyielding;
Tree mortality;
Self-and alien-thinning;
Dropout stem volume;
Stand density;
Demixing;
FAGUS-SYLVATICA L;
SYLVESTRIS L;
PURE STANDS;
GROWTH;
PRODUCTIVITY;
DENSITY;
MODEL;
DIVERSITY;
DYNAMICS;
FORESTS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121008
中图分类号:
S7 [林业];
学科分类号:
0829 ;
0907 ;
摘要:
Many studies show that mixed species stands can have higher gross growth, or so-called overyielding, compared with monocultures. However, much less is known about mortality in mixed stands. Knowledge is lacking, for example, of how much of the gross growth is retained in the standing stock and how much is lost due to mor-tality. Here, we addressed this knowledge gap of mixed stand dynamics by evaluating 23 middle-aged, unthinned triplets of monospecific and mixed plots of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) repeatedly surveyed over 6-8 years throughout Europe. For explanation of technical terms in this abstract see Box 1.First, mixed stands produced more gross growth (+10%) but less net growth (-28%) compared with the weighted mean growth of monospecific stands. In monospecific stands, 73% of the gross growth was accumu-lated in the standing stock, whereas only 48% was accumulated in mixed stands. The gross overyielding of pine (2%) was lower than that of beech (18%). However, the net overyielding of beech was still 10%, whereas low growth and dropout of pine caused a substantial reduction from gross to net growth.Second, the mortality rates, the self-and alien-thinning strength, and the stem volume dropout were higher in mixed stands than monospecific stands. The main reason was the lower survival of pine, whereas beech persisted more similarly in mixed compared with monospecific stands.Third, we found a 10% higher stand density in mixed stands compared with monospecific stands at the first survey. This superiority decreased to 5% in the second survey.Fourth, the mixing proportion of Scots pine decreased from 46% to 44% between the first and second survey. The more than doubling of the segregation index (S) calculated by Pielou index (S increased from 0.2 to 0.5), indicated a strong tendency towards demixing due to pine.Fifth, we showed that with increasing water supply the dropout fraction of the gross growth in the mixture slightly decreased for pine, strongly increased for beech, and also increased for the stand as a whole. We discuss how the reduction of inter-specific competition by thinning may enable a continuous benefit of diversity and overyielding of mixed compared with monospecific stands of Scots pine and European beech.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文