Perioperative outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation in Germany: results from the GRAND study

被引:2
|
作者
Pyrgidis, Nikolaos [1 ]
Schulz, Gerald B. [1 ]
Chaloupka, Michael [1 ]
Volz, Yannic [1 ]
Pfitzinger, Paulo L. [1 ]
Rodler, Severin [1 ]
Berg, Elena [1 ]
Weinhold, Philipp [1 ]
Jokisch, Friedrich [1 ]
Stief, Christian G. [1 ]
Becker, Armin J. [1 ]
Marcon, Julian [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany
关键词
POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; SURGERY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1038/s41443-023-00796-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We aimed to assess the recommended annual hospital volume for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) and to provide evidence on perioperative outcomes of semi-rigid and inflatable PPI in Germany. We used the GeRmAn Nationwide inpatient Data (GRAND) from 2005 to 2021 and report the largest study to date with 7,222 patients. 6,818 (94.4%) patients underwent inflatable and 404 (5.6%) semi-rigid PPI. Inflatable PPI was significantly associated with shorter length of hospital stay (difference of 2.2 days, 95%CI: 1.6-2.7, p < 0.001), lower odds of perioperative urinary tract infections (5.5% versus 9.2%; OR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.41-0.84, p = 0.003) and surgical wound infections (1% versus 2.5%; OR: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.22-0.88, p = 0.012) compared to semi-rigid PPI. Overall, 4255 (62.4%) inflatable PPIs were undertaken in low- ( < 20 PPI/year) and 2563 (37.6%) in high-volume ( >= 20 PPI/year) centers. High-volume centers were significantly associated with shorter length of hospital stay (difference of 1.4 days, 95%CI: 1.2-1.7, p < 0.001) compared to low-volume centers. Our findings suggest that inflatable PPI leads to a shorter length of hospital stay and lower rates of perioperative urinary tract and surgical wound infections compared to semi-rigid PPI. Patients undergoing surgery in high-volume centers for inflatable PPI are discharged earlier from the hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 853
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DRAIN USE DURING PENILE PROSTHESIS SURGERY, RESULTS FROM THE PROPPER STUDY
    Karpman, E.
    Brant, W.
    Kansas, B.
    Bella, A.
    Christine, B.
    Jones, L.
    Khera, M.
    Kholer, T.
    Bennett, N.
    Rhee, E.
    Henry, G.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (02): : S28 - S28
  • [42] SURGEON PREFERENCE INTRAOPERATIVELY IN SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR RESIDUAL CURVATURE AFTER PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH PENILE CURVATURE: RESULTS OF THE PROPPER STUDY
    Henry, G.
    Karpman, E.
    Bella, A.
    Bennett, N.
    Christine, B.
    Jones, L.
    Kansas, B.
    Khera, M.
    Kohler, T.
    Rhee, E.
    Brant, W.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (02): : E88 - E88
  • [43] Penile prosthesis and complications: Results from 577 implants
    Pozza, Diego
    Marcantonio, Andrea
    Mosca, Augusto
    Pozza, Carlotta
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2020, 92 (04) : 302 - 308
  • [44] INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION WITH CAVERNOUS TISSUE SPARING: A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Dhir, Rohit
    Chan, Andrea
    Lin, Haocheng
    Romero, Claudio
    Alba, Frances
    Wang, Run
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2012, 9 : 33 - 33
  • [45] An outcomes analysis of penile prosthesis implantation following radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion: a multicentric retrospective cohort study
    Falcone, Marco
    Pucci, Luigi
    Garaffa, Giulio
    Cocci, Andrea
    Gillo, Arianna
    Capece, Marco
    Ceruti, Carlo
    Timpano, Massimiliano
    Sedigh, Omid
    Preto, Mirko
    Blecher, Gideon
    Chiancone, Francesco
    Carrino, Maurizio
    Rolle, Luigi
    Gontero, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (01) : 126 - 132
  • [46] Re: An Outcomes Analysis of over 200 Revision Surgeries for Penile Prosthesis Implantation: A Multicenter Study Editorial Comment
    Seftel, Allen D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (02): : 546 - 546
  • [47] An outcomes analysis of penile prosthesis implantation following radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion: a multicentric retrospective cohort study
    Marco Falcone
    Luigi Pucci
    Giulio Garaffa
    Andrea Cocci
    Arianna Gillo
    Marco Capece
    Carlo Ceruti
    Massimiliano Timpano
    Omid Sedigh
    Mirko Preto
    Gideon Blecher
    Francesco Chiancone
    Maurizio Carrino
    Luigi Rolle
    Paolo Gontero
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 2020, 32 : 126 - 132
  • [48] WHICH PATIENT MAY BENEFIT THE MOST FROM PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION?
    Capogrosso, P.
    Deho, F.
    Pescatori, E.
    Caraceni, E.
    Mondaini, N.
    Utizi, L.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (05): : S25 - S25
  • [49] Which patient may benefit the most from penile prosthesis implantation?
    La Croce, Giovanni
    Schifano, Nicolo
    Pescatori, Edoardo
    Caraceni, Enrico
    Colombo, Fulvio
    Bettocchi, Carlo
    Carrino, Maurizio
    Vitarelli, Antonio
    Pozza, Diego
    Fiordelise, Stefano
    Varvello, Francesco
    Paradiso, Matteo
    Silvani, Mauro
    Mondaini, Nicola
    Natali, Alessandro
    Falcone, Marco
    Ceruti, Carlo
    Salonia, Andrea
    Antonini, Gabriele
    Cai, Tommaso
    Palmieri, Alessandro
    Deho, Federico
    Capogrosso, Paolo
    ANDROLOGY, 2022, 10 (08) : 1567 - 1574
  • [50] Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates
    F Akdemir
    E Okulu
    Ö Kayıgil
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 2017, 29 : 184 - 188