Early closure compared to late closure of temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial study

被引:4
|
作者
Ahmadi-Amoli, Hadi [1 ]
Rahimi, Mohsen [2 ]
Abedi-kichi, Raziyeh [1 ]
Ebrahimian, Nazli [1 ]
Hosseiniasl, Seyed-Mohammad [3 ]
Hajebi, Reza [1 ]
Rahimpour, Ehsan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sina Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Rajaee Cardiovasc Med & Res Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Tehran, Iran
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Sina Hosp, Hassan Abad Sq,Imam Khomeini St, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Closure of ileostomy; Low anterior resection; Rectal cancer; Quality of life (QOL); Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS); LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; EXCISION;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02934-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundA temporary loop ileostomy is one of the most common methods for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer patients who underwent low anterior resection. However, the optimal timing of loop ileostomy reversal remains unknown. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the debilitating complications caused by early closure of ileostomy in comparison with late closure in rectal cancer patients.DesignA randomized, controlled, unblinded, and monocentric trial.MethodsA total of 104 rectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to the case group of early closure of ileostomy (n = 50) and the control group of late closure of ileostomy (n = 54). This trial was undertaken in a single colorectal institution, a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran. Randomization and allocation to the trial group were conducted by using variable block randomization based on quadruple numbers. The primary endpoint of this trial was determined by the complications of early ileostomy closure versus those of late closure in rectal cancer patients who had undergone low anterior resection. In early closure, loop ileostomy is reversed 2-3 weeks after the first two courses of adjuvant chemotherapy, while in late closure, the ileostomy is reversed 2-3 weeks after the last course of adjuvant chemotherapy.ResultsFollow-up of 1 year demonstrated a reduction in the risk of complications and an improved quality of life in patients with rectal cancer following low anterior resection and chemotherapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) in the case group but did not reach a significant difference (p = 0.555). In addition, there was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes, such as blood loss, operative time, readmission, and reoperation; also, no statistically significant differences were reported between the groups in patients' quality of life or LARS score.ConclusionIn summary, it seems that early closure of ileostomy is not better than late closure in improving patients' quality of life with rectal cancer following low anterior resection and chemotherapy (neoadjuvant and adjuvant); no statistical difference was observed for reduction of risk of ostomy complications. Thus, neither of these methods (early closure versus late closure) is superior to the other, and controversy still exists.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of the laparoscopic approach, early closure and preoperative stimulation on outcomes of ileostomy closure after rectal resection
    Norte, Andrea
    Martinez, Carmen
    Pasalodos, Ana
    Tort, Ivette
    Sanchez, Anna
    Hernandez, Pilar
    Bollo, Jesus
    Targarona, Eduard Maria
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2024, 102 (11): : 590 - 598
  • [32] Absorbable Subcuticular Staples Compared With Suture for Cesarean Closure A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Madsen, Annetta Madeline
    Dow, Margaret L.
    Hutz, Catherine E.
    Tessmer-Tuck, Jennifer A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 26S - 27S
  • [33] Safety of early ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Clausen, Frederik Bjerg
    Dohrn, Niclas
    Holmich, Emma Rosenkrantz
    Klein, Mads
    Gogenur, Ismail
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [34] Safety of early ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Frederik Bjerg Clausen
    Niclas Dohrn
    Emma Rosenkrantz Hölmich
    Mads Klein
    Ismail Gögenur
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 203 - 212
  • [35] Outcome of early versus late ileostomy closure in patients with rectal cancers undergoing low anterior resection: A prospective cohort study
    Bananzade, Alimohammad
    Dehghankhalili, Maryam
    Bahrami, Faranak
    Tadayon, Seyed Mohammad Kazem
    Ghaffarpasand, Fariborz
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (10) : 4277 - 4282
  • [36] Early Versus Late Preventive Ileostomy Closure Following Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cheng, Zhiqiang
    Dong, Shuohui
    Bi, Dongsong
    Wang, Yanlei
    Dai, Yong
    Zhang, Xiang
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (01) : 128 - 137
  • [37] Timely closure of loop ileostomy following anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Chand, M.
    Nash, G. F.
    Talbot, R. W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2008, 17 (06) : 611 - 615
  • [38] Randomized clinical trial of early versus delayed temporary stoma closure after proctectomy
    Alves, A.
    Panis, Y.
    Lelong, B.
    Dousset, B.
    Benoist, S.
    Vicaut, E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (06) : 693 - 698
  • [39] Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Ileostomy Closure: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Liu, Jia
    Liu, Kun
    Wang, Huixian
    Hu, Hongli
    Sun, Guolin
    Ye, Xiaofei
    Lou, Zheng
    Bian, Jinjun
    Bo, Lulong
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 1863 - 1872
  • [40] Prospective study on the safety and feasibility of early ileostomy closure 2 weeks after lower anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Lee, Kyung Ha
    Kim, Hyung Ook
    Kim, Jin Soo
    Kim, Ji Yeon
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 96 (01) : 41 - 46