Banded One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (BOAGB) for Patients Living with Obesity and Extreme Obesity: A Single Institution's Experience

被引:1
|
作者
Quint, Elchanan [1 ]
Perry, Zvi H. [2 ,3 ]
Elkrinawi, Nur [1 ]
Kukeev, Ivan [1 ]
Czeiger, David [1 ]
Vakhrushev, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Sebbag, Gilbert [1 ]
Dukhno, Oleg [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Soroka Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Med Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gur Univ Negev, Soroka Univ Med Ctr, Fac Hlth Sci, Bariatr Surg Unit, Negev, Israel
[3] Soroka Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Med Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Banded one-anastomosis gastric bypass; Excess weight loss; One-anastomosis gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy; Surgical outcomes; DIABETES-MELLITUS; BARIATRIC SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-024-07194-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe prevalence of patients suffering from extreme obesity (body mass index (BMI) >= 50) has significantly increased over the past three decades, surpassing the rise in the general population of overweight patients. Weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery in patients suffering from extreme obesity are less favorable, with a higher incidence of weight regain. Variations of existing bariatric procedures have been proposed to address this issue. One such variation is adding a gastric band to limit the expansion of the newly created pouch. Limited data exist regarding the effectiveness of this procedure, called the banded one-anastomosis gastric bypass (BOAGB) procedure, compared to other bariatric procedures.MethodIn this retrospective study, we compared all patients who underwent the BOAGB procedure at the Bariatric Surgery Unit in our Medical Center with a postoperative follow-up of at least 1 year with patients who underwent a one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedures. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, surgical outcomes, complications, and postoperative quality-of-life assessments.ResultsOne hundred eleven patients were enlisted to our study during the relevant study period-24 patients underwent the BOAGB procedure, 43 underwent OAGB, and 44 underwent a SG. Lost to follow-up beyond 30 days was 9% (at 1-year post-surgery, we were able to establish contact with 101 patients). The pre-op BMI was significantly higher in the BOAGB group compared to the other procedures. Additionally, a higher prevalence of diabetes was observed in the BOAGB group. The duration of surgery was significantly longer for the BOAGB procedure. No significant differences were found in surgical complications. Overall, all procedures resulted in significant excess weight loss (EWL) or change in BMI, improvement in comorbidities, and improved quality of life postoperatively.ConclusionsThe BOAGB procedure, like OAGB and SG, demonstrated favorable weight loss outcomes and weight maintenance 1 year postoperatively without significant differences between the procedures. The BOAGB procedure is relatively new, with good bariatric outcomes and a favorable safety profile. Long-term study is needed to evaluate these various bariatric procedures' efficacy further.
引用
收藏
页码:1756 / 1763
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LAPAROSCOPIC ONE-ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS AS A REVISION SURGERY; A CENTRE EXPERIENCE
    Elabd, R.
    Almutairi, R.
    Alebrahum, A.
    Alkhayat, H.
    Jamal, M.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 : 35 - 35
  • [22] Comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity: a 5-year study
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Nautiyal, Hemant Kumar
    Kosta, Susmit
    Mathur, Winni
    Fobi, Mathias
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2019, 15 (12) : 2038 - 2044
  • [23] EARLY OUTCOMES AFTER ONE-ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS (OAGB): A SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE
    Delgado, Angelica Versoza
    Chia, Daryl K. A.
    Fung, Javis
    Johnson, Rachel
    Kayambu, Geetha
    Lim, Serene P. Y.
    Joo, Neo Wen
    Wen, Lin
    Guowei, Kim
    So, Jimmy B. Y.
    Shabbir, Asim
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (SUPPL 4) : 1159 - 1159
  • [24] LAPAROSCOPIC ONE-ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS AS A REVISION SURGERY; A SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE.
    Elabd, R.
    AlBraheem, A.
    Almutairi, R.
    AlKhayat, H.
    Jamal, M.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 : 504 - 504
  • [25] Effect of one-anastomosis gastric bypass on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with vitamin D deficiency and morbid obesity: A secondary analysis
    Kruschitz, Renate
    Wakolbinger, Maria
    Schindler, Karin
    Prager, Gerhard
    Hoppichler, Friedrich
    Marculescu, Rodrig
    Ludvik, Bernhard
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 30 (12) : 2379 - 2388
  • [26] Differentiating mini-gastric bypass/one-anastomosis gastric bypass from the single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass procedures
    Carbajo, Miguel A.
    Luque-de-Leon, Enrique
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2016, 12 (04) : 933 - 934
  • [27] Effect of gastrojejunal anastomosis diameter in laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity and related disorders: a comparative study
    ElGohary, Hatem
    Boshnak, Noha
    Alabassy, Eslam
    Abdulrahman, Mohammed Gamal
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 40 (04): : 1056 - 1063
  • [28] Remission and relapse of diabetes after sleeve gastrectomy and one-anastomosis gastric bypass: The Tehran Obesity Treatment Study
    Sadeghi, Sara
    Hosseinpanah, Farhad
    Khalaj, Alireza
    Ebadinejad, Amir
    Mahdavi, Maryam
    Valizadeh, Majid
    Barzin, Maryam
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024,
  • [29] One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Magouliotis, Dimitrios E.
    Tasiopoulou, Vasiliki S.
    Svokos, Alexis A.
    Svokos, Konstantina A.
    Sioka, Eleni
    Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (09) : 2479 - 2487
  • [30] One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dimitrios E. Magouliotis
    Vasiliki S. Tasiopoulou
    Alexis A. Svokos
    Konstantina A. Svokos
    Eleni Sioka
    Dimitrios Zacharoulis
    Obesity Surgery, 2017, 27 : 2479 - 2487