HELP - Heidelberg decision aid for lung cancer patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Deis, Nicole [1 ]
Unsoeld, Laura [1 ]
Siegle, Anja [1 ]
Krisam, Johannes [2 ]
Thomas, Michael [1 ]
Villalobos, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Thorac Oncol, Translat Lung Res Ctr Heidelberg TLRC H, Thoraxklin Heidelberg,German Ctr Lung Res DZL, Rontgenstr 1, D-69126 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Inst Med Biometry, Neuenheimer Feld 130-3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Lung cancer; Shared decision-making; Decision aid; Decision coaching; OF-LIFE DISCUSSIONS; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; CARE; END; VALIDATION; SCALE; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07365-2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundShared decision-making (SDM), which increases the patient's well-being, adherence, and success of treatment, is becoming increasingly important in medicine and especially in oncology. To empower patients to participate more actively in consultations with their physicians decision aids have been developed. In non-curative settings, such as the treatment of advanced lung cancer, decisions differ substantially from the curative setting, as uncertain gains in terms of survival outcomes and quality of life have to be weighed against the severe side effects of treatment regimens. There is still a lack of tools developed and implemented for such specific settings in cancer therapy that support shared decision-making. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the HELP decision aid.MethodsThe HELP-study is designed as a randomized, controlled, open monocenter trial with two parallel groups. The intervention consists of the use of the HELP decision aid brochure, accompanied by a decision coaching session. The primary endpoint is clarity of personal attitude as operationalized by the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) after the decision coaching. Randomization will be performed as stratified block randomization according to the characteristic of preferred decision-making at baseline with a 1:1 allocation.The participants in the control group get usual care, i.e., the doctor-patient conversation takes place without preliminary coaching and deliberation about their preferences and goals.DiscussionDeveloping decision aids (DA) for (lung) cancer patients with limited prognosis should empower patients to address these aspects and include information about "Best Supportive Care" as a treatment option. Using and implementing the decision aid HELP can not only give patients the possibility to include their personal wishes and values in the decision-making process, but also raise the awareness of shared decision-making itself among these patients and their physicians.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Four Conversations: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online, Personalized Coping, and Decision Aid for Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients
    Smith, Sophia K.
    Westbrook, Kelly
    MacDermott, Kristin
    Amarasekara, Sarthya
    LeBlanc, Matthew
    Pan, Wei
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 23 (03) : 353 - 358
  • [22] An entertainment-education colorectal cancer screening decision aid for African American patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Hoffman, Aubri S.
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Kamath, Geetanjali R.
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Leal, Viola B.
    Linder, Suzanne K.
    Jibaja-Weiss, Maria L.
    Raju, Gottumukkala S.
    Volk, Robert J.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (08) : 1401 - 1408
  • [23] Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients considering fertility preservation
    Ehrbar, V.
    Urech, C.
    Rochlitz, C.
    Daellenbach, R. Zanetti
    Moffat, R.
    Stiller, R.
    Germeyer, A.
    Nawroth, F.
    Dangel, A.
    Findeklee, S.
    Tschudin, S.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 18 - 19
  • [24] A decision aid versus shared decision making for prostate cancer screening results of a randomized, controlled trial
    Stamm, Andrew W.
    Banerji, John S.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Slee, April
    Akapame, Sydney
    Dahl, Kathryn
    Massman, John D., III
    Soung, Michael C.
    Pittenger, Kim R.
    Corman, John M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 8910 - 8917
  • [25] Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial
    Madden, Tessa
    Holttum, Jessica
    Maddipati, Ragini
    Secura, Gina M.
    Nease, Robert F.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Politi, Mary C.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 102 (05) : 339 - 345
  • [26] Randomized, controlled trial of on interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease
    Morgan, MW
    Deber, RB
    Llewellyn-Thomas, HA
    Gladstone, P
    Cusimano, RJ
    O'Rourke, K
    Tomlinson, G
    Detsky, AS
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (10) : 685 - 693
  • [27] A randomized trial of a decision aid for breast cancer surgery
    Goel, V
    Sawka, C
    Thiel, E
    Gort, E
    O'Connor, A
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) : 482 - 482
  • [28] A decision aid to facilitate informed choices among cataract patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Ye, Guofang
    Qu, Bo
    Tham, Yih-Chung
    Zhong, Yuxin
    Jin, Ling
    Lamoureux, Ecosse
    Congdon, Nathan
    Zheng, Yingfeng
    Liu, Yizhi
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (06) : 1295 - 1303
  • [29] Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease
    Matthew W. Morgan
    Raisa B. Deber
    Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas
    Peter Gladstone
    R. J. Cusimano
    Keith O’Rourke
    George Tomlinson
    Allan S. Detsky
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2000, 15 : 685 - 693
  • [30] DOES THE INCLUSION OF INCIDENTAL FINDINGS INFORMATION IN A LUNG CANCER SCREENING DECISION AID AFFECT SCREENING INTENT? A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Clark, Stephen
    Reuland, Daniel
    Brenner, Alison
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (SUPPL 1) : S147 - S147