共 46 条
Performance evaluation of the bio-rad BioPlex 2200 multiplex system in the detection of measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella-zoster antibodies
被引:0
|作者:
Lafreniere, Matthew A.
[1
]
Badr, Eley
[2
]
Beattie, John
[2
]
Macri, Joseph
[2
]
Khan, Waliul I.
[2
]
机构:
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[2] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton Reg Lab Med Program, 237 Barton St East, Hamilton, ON L8L2 X2, Canada
来源:
关键词:
Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200;
MMRV;
Bio-Rad Evolis Plus IgG MMV;
Precision;
Abbott Architect IgG Rubella;
IGG;
DISEASE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100131
中图分类号:
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号:
100401 ;
摘要:
Background: Measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella-zoster (MMRV) immunity testing is important in occupational screening of healthcare workers and at-risk populations.Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare the performance of the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 MMRV multiplex fluorescence immunoassay (MFI) against two enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods: the Bio-Rad Evolis Twin Plus measles, mumps, and varicella-zoster (MMV) IgG assay and the Abbott Architect Rubella IgG assay.Study Design: Clinically uncharacterized serum specimens were obtained and analyzed using the Bio-Rad BioPlex assay and compared against the EIA methods.Results: The Bio-Rad BioPlex demonstrated total agreement of 85.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 78.0 to 90.7%), 92.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 86.7 to 96.1%), 92.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 86.9 to 95.7%), and 98.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 93.7 to 99.8%) for measles, mumps, varicella-zoster, and rubella, respectively, against the current EIA methods. Furthermore, precision testing agreed with the manufac-turer's package insert in 10 of 13 pooled samples. Conclusion: These data indicate that the Bio-Rad BioPlex has comparable performance to the EIA methods.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文