Projected landscape-scale repercussions of global action for climate and biodiversity protection

被引:15
|
作者
von Jeetze, Patrick Jose [1 ,2 ]
Weindl, Isabelle [1 ]
Johnson, Justin Andrew [3 ]
Borrelli, Pasquale [4 ,5 ]
Panagos, Panos [6 ]
Molina Bacca, Edna J. [1 ,2 ]
Karstens, Kristine [1 ,2 ]
Humpenoeder, Florian [1 ]
Dietrich, Jan Philipp [1 ]
Minoli, Sara [1 ]
Mueller, Christoph [1 ]
Lotze-Campen, Hermann [1 ,2 ]
Popp, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Assoc, Potsdam Insti Climate Impact Res PIK, POB 601203, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, 1940 Buford Ave, St Paul, MN 55105 USA
[4] Univ Basel, Dept Environm Sci Environm Geosci, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Sci, Rome, Italy
[6] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, IT-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
关键词
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; VEGETATION MODEL; NITROGEN-CYCLE; MANAGED LAND; INTENSIFICATION; DEGRADATION; GRASSLANDS; DECLINE; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-023-38043-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Competition between agriculture and land conservation may hinder climate and biodiversity targets. Here, the authors use global models integrating multiple spatial scales to assess how ambitious land conservation action and associated land-use dynamics could drive changes in landscape heterogeneity, pollination supply and soil loss. Land conservation and increased carbon uptake on land are fundamental to achieving the ambitious targets of the climate and biodiversity conventions. Yet, it remains largely unknown how such ambitions, along with an increasing demand for agricultural products, could drive landscape-scale changes and affect other key regulating nature's contributions to people (NCP) that sustain land productivity outside conservation priority areas. By using an integrated, globally consistent modelling approach, we show that ambitious carbon-focused land restoration action and the enlargement of protected areas alone may be insufficient to reverse negative trends in landscape heterogeneity, pollination supply, and soil loss. However, we also find that these actions could be combined with dedicated interventions that support critical NCP and biodiversity conservation outside of protected areas. In particular, our models indicate that conserving at least 20% semi-natural habitat within farmed landscapes could primarily be achieved by spatially relocating cropland outside conservation priority areas, without additional carbon losses from land-use change, primary land conversion or reductions in agricultural productivity.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Landscape-scale benefits of protected areas for tropical biodiversity (vol 620, pg 807, 2023)
    Brodie, Jedediah F.
    Mohd-Azlan, Jayasilan
    Chen, Cheng
    Wearn, Oliver R.
    Deith, Mairin C. M.
    Ball, James G. C.
    Slade, Eleanor M.
    Burslem, David F. R. P.
    Teoh, Shu Woan
    Williams, Peter J.
    Nguyen, An
    Moore, Jonathan H.
    Goetz, Scott J.
    Burns, Patrick
    Jantz, Patrick
    Hakkenberg, Christopher R.
    Kaszta, Zaneta M.
    Cushman, Sam
    Coomes, David
    Helmy, Olga E.
    Reynolds, Glen
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Jetz, Walter
    Luskin, Matthew Scott
    NATURE, 2024, 628 (8009) : E5 - E5
  • [32] Local- and landscape-scale variables shape insect diversity in an urban biodiversity hot spot
    Adams, Benjamin J.
    Li, Enjie
    Bahlai, Christie A.
    Meineke, Emily K.
    McGlynn, Terry P.
    Brown, Brian
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2020, 30 (04)
  • [33] Landscape-scale changes in plant species abundance and biodiversity of a sagebrush steppe over 45 years
    Anderson, JE
    Inouye, RS
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2001, 71 (04) : 531 - 556
  • [34] Epifaunal diversity patterns within and among seagrass meadows suggest landscape-scale biodiversity processes
    Whippo, Ross
    Knight, Nicole S.
    Prentice, Carolyn
    Cristiani, John
    Siegle, Matthew R.
    O'Connor, Mary, I
    ECOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (11):
  • [35] Landscape approaches in the environmental protection policies: the Tuscany Biodiversity Action Plan
    Lombardi, Leonardo
    Matina, Paolo
    Casadio, Andrea
    Pollutri, Antonio
    RI VISTA-RICERCHE PER LA PROGETTAZIONE DEL PAESAGGIO, 2011, (1-2): : 99 - 105
  • [36] Balancing site-based protection versus landscape-scale measures in English woodland
    Kirby, KJ
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY OF TREES AND FORESTS, 2004, : 263 - 270
  • [37] Assessing climate change impacts on forest ecosystems for landscape-scale spatial planning in Nepal
    Thapa, Gokarna Jung
    Wikramanayake, Eric
    Jnawali, Shant Raj
    Oglethorpe, Judy
    Adhikari, Ramesh
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2016, 110 (03): : 345 - 352
  • [38] Macroscale climate change predictions have little influence on landscape-scale habitat suitability
    Tourinho, Luara
    Prevedello, Jayme A.
    Carvalho, Bruno M.
    Rocha, Diogo S. B.
    Vale, Mariana M.
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 20 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [39] Declining relict plants: Climate effect or seed dispersal disruption? A landscape-scale approach
    Rotllan-Puig, Xavier
    Traveset, Anna
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2016, 17 (01) : 81 - 91
  • [40] Publisher Correction to: The response of pollen-transport networks to landscape-scale climate variation
    Christine Urbanowicz
    Ross A. Virginia
    Rebecca E. Irwin
    Polar Biology, 2018, 41 : 1651 - 1651