Projected landscape-scale repercussions of global action for climate and biodiversity protection

被引:15
|
作者
von Jeetze, Patrick Jose [1 ,2 ]
Weindl, Isabelle [1 ]
Johnson, Justin Andrew [3 ]
Borrelli, Pasquale [4 ,5 ]
Panagos, Panos [6 ]
Molina Bacca, Edna J. [1 ,2 ]
Karstens, Kristine [1 ,2 ]
Humpenoeder, Florian [1 ]
Dietrich, Jan Philipp [1 ]
Minoli, Sara [1 ]
Mueller, Christoph [1 ]
Lotze-Campen, Hermann [1 ,2 ]
Popp, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Assoc, Potsdam Insti Climate Impact Res PIK, POB 601203, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, 1940 Buford Ave, St Paul, MN 55105 USA
[4] Univ Basel, Dept Environm Sci Environm Geosci, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Sci, Rome, Italy
[6] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, IT-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
关键词
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NATURES CONTRIBUTIONS; VEGETATION MODEL; NITROGEN-CYCLE; MANAGED LAND; INTENSIFICATION; DEGRADATION; GRASSLANDS; DECLINE; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-023-38043-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Competition between agriculture and land conservation may hinder climate and biodiversity targets. Here, the authors use global models integrating multiple spatial scales to assess how ambitious land conservation action and associated land-use dynamics could drive changes in landscape heterogeneity, pollination supply and soil loss. Land conservation and increased carbon uptake on land are fundamental to achieving the ambitious targets of the climate and biodiversity conventions. Yet, it remains largely unknown how such ambitions, along with an increasing demand for agricultural products, could drive landscape-scale changes and affect other key regulating nature's contributions to people (NCP) that sustain land productivity outside conservation priority areas. By using an integrated, globally consistent modelling approach, we show that ambitious carbon-focused land restoration action and the enlargement of protected areas alone may be insufficient to reverse negative trends in landscape heterogeneity, pollination supply, and soil loss. However, we also find that these actions could be combined with dedicated interventions that support critical NCP and biodiversity conservation outside of protected areas. In particular, our models indicate that conserving at least 20% semi-natural habitat within farmed landscapes could primarily be achieved by spatially relocating cropland outside conservation priority areas, without additional carbon losses from land-use change, primary land conversion or reductions in agricultural productivity.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Projected landscape-scale repercussions of global action for climate and biodiversity protection
    Patrick José von Jeetze
    Isabelle Weindl
    Justin Andrew Johnson
    Pasquale Borrelli
    Panos Panagos
    Edna J. Molina Bacca
    Kristine Karstens
    Florian Humpenöder
    Jan Philipp Dietrich
    Sara Minoli
    Christoph Müller
    Hermann Lotze-Campen
    Alexander Popp
    Nature Communications, 14
  • [2] Landscape-scale indicators of biodiversity's vulnerability to climate change
    Klausmeyer, Kirk R.
    Shaw, M. Rebecca
    MacKenzie, Jason B.
    Cameron, D. Richard
    ECOSPHERE, 2011, 2 (08):
  • [3] Space for nature: developing landscape-scale action for woodland biodiversity
    Smithers, RJ
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY OF TREES AND FORESTS, 2004, : 187 - 194
  • [4] Landscape-scale management for biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Petit, Sandrine
    Landis, Douglas A.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 347
  • [5] Landscape-scale benefits of protected areas for tropical biodiversity
    Brodie, Jedediah F.
    Mohd-Azlan, Jayasilan
    Chen, Cheng
    Wearn, Oliver R.
    Deith, Mairin C. M.
    Ball, James G. C.
    Slade, Eleanor M.
    Burslem, David F. R. P.
    Teoh, Shu Woan
    Williams, Peter J.
    Nguyen, An
    Moore, Jonathan H.
    Goetz, Scott J.
    Burns, Patrick
    Jantz, Patrick
    Hakkenberg, Christopher R.
    Kaszta, Zaneta M.
    Cushman, Sam
    Coomes, David
    Helmy, Olga E.
    Reynolds, Glen
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Jetz, Walter
    Luskin, Matthew Scott
    NATURE, 2023, 620 (7975) : 807 - +
  • [6] Assessing the effectiveness of landscape-scale forest adaptation actions to improve resilience under projected climate change
    Maxwell, Charles J.
    Scheller, Robert M.
    Wilson, Kristen N.
    Manley, Patricia N.
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [7] Landscape-scale forest loss as a catalyst of population and biodiversity change
    Daskalova, Gergana N.
    Myers-Smith, Isla H.
    Bjorkman, Anne D.
    Blowes, Shane A.
    Supp, Sarah R.
    Magurran, Anne E.
    Dornelas, Maria
    SCIENCE, 2020, 368 (6497) : 1341 - +
  • [8] Landscape-scale conservation mitigates the biodiversity loss of grassland birds
    Pavlacky, David C., Jr.
    Green, Adam W.
    George, Thomas Luke
    Iovanna, Rich
    Bartuszevige, Anne M.
    Correll, Maureen D.
    Panjabi, Arvind O.
    Ryder, Thomas Brandt
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2022, 32 (03)
  • [9] Landscape-scale biodiversity governance: Scenarios for reshaping spaces of governance
    Leventon, Julia
    Schaal, Tamara
    Velten, Sarah
    Loos, Jacqueline
    Fischer, Joern
    Newig, Jens
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2019, 29 (03) : 170 - 184
  • [10] Global change at the landscape level: relating regional and landscape-scale drivers of historical climate trends in the Southern Appalachians
    Lesser, Mark R.
    Fridley, Jason D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2016, 36 (03) : 1197 - 1209