The Impact of day of Mailing on Web Survey Response Rate and Response Speed

被引:2
|
作者
Lynn, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Bianchi, Annamaria [3 ]
Gaia, Alessandra [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Survey Methodol, Colcheste, England
[2] Univ Essex, Inst Social & Econ Res, Wivenhoe Pk, Colcheste CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[3] Univ Bergamo, Econ Stat, Bergamo, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
关键词
adaptive design; survey invitation; survey nonresponse; targeted survey design; web surveys; MIXED-MODE DESIGN; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1177/08944393231173887
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The day of the week on which sample members are invited to participate in a web survey might influence propensity to respond, or to respond promptly (within two days from the invitation). This effect could differ between sample members with different characteristics. We explore such effects using a large-scale experiment implemented on the Understanding Society Innovation Panel, in which some people received an invitation on a Monday and some on a Friday. Specifically, we test whether any effect of the invitation day is moderated by economic activity status (which may result in a different organisation of time by day of the week), previous participation in the panel, or whether the invitation was sent only by post or by post and email simultaneously. Overall, we do not find any effect of day of invitation in survey participation or in prompt participation. However, sample members who provided an email address, and, thus, were contacted by email in addition to postal letter, are less likely to participate if invited on Friday (email reminders: Sunday and Tuesday) as opposed to Monday (email reminders: Wednesday and Friday). Given that no difference between the two protocols is found for prompt response, the effect seems to be due to the day of mailing of reminders. With respect to sample members' economic activity status, those not having a job and the retired are less likely to participate when invited on a Friday; this result holds also for prompt participation, but only for retired respondents. Also, sample members who work long hours are less likely to participate when invited on a Friday; however, no effect is found for prompt response.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:352 / 368
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] RESPONSE OF PHYSICIANS TO A MAILING ABOUT STUTTERING
    ROSENFIELD, DB
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 1981, 6 (02) : 187 - 188
  • [12] Response rate and potential sample bias in web-based survey of college students
    Saltz, RF
    Freisthler, B
    Paschall, MJ
    Crawford, S
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2004, 28 (05) : 33A - 33A
  • [13] The effect of email invitation elements on response rate in a web survey within an online community
    Petrovcic, Andraz
    Petric, Gregor
    Manfreda, Katja Lozar
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 56 : 320 - 329
  • [14] Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists
    McKernan, Susan C.
    Reynolds, Julie C.
    McInroy, Brooke
    Damiano, Peter C.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2022, 82 (04) : 484 - 490
  • [15] PERSONALIZATION STRATEGIES, RESPONSE RATE AND RESPONSE QUALITY IN A MAIL SURVEY
    KERIN, RA
    SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1974, 55 (01) : 175 - 181
  • [16] The impact of survey mode on the response rate in a survey of the factors that influence Minnesota physicians' disclosure practices
    Weaver, Lesley
    Beebe, Timothy J.
    Rockwood, Todd
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [17] The impact of survey mode on the response rate in a survey of the factors that influence Minnesota physicians’ disclosure practices
    Lesley Weaver
    Timothy J. Beebe
    Todd Rockwood
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [18] A comparison of Web and mail survey response rates
    Kaplowitz, MD
    Hadlock, TD
    Levine, R
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2004, 68 (01) : 94 - 101
  • [19] Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: Impact on response rate and quality
    Timothy J Beebe
    Enrique Rey
    Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss
    Sarah Jenkins
    Kandace Lackore
    Nicholas J Talley
    Richard G Locke
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10
  • [20] Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: Impact on response rate and quality
    Beebe, Timothy J.
    Rey, Enrique
    Ziegenfuss, Jeanette Y.
    Jenkins, Sarah
    Lackore, Kandace
    Talley, Nicholas J.
    Locke, Richard G., III
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10