Integration of consumer preferences into dynamic life cycle assessment for the sharing economy: methodology and case study for shared mobility

被引:4
|
作者
Fernando, Chalaka [1 ]
Buttriss, Gary [2 ]
Yoon, Hwan-Jin [3 ]
Soo, Vi Kie [1 ,4 ]
Compston, Paul [1 ]
Doolan, Matthew [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Australian Res Council, Training Ctr Lightweight Automot Struct, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Australian E Hlth Res Ctr, Hlth Intelligence, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[4] Thinkstep Anz, Regus Off, Level 5, 616 Harris St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] UNSW Canberra, Sch Engn & Informat Technol, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
来源
关键词
Dynamic life cycle assessment; Consumer preference; Sharing economy; System dynamics; Consumer preferences; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; BUSINESS MODELS; SUSTAINABILITY; SERVICE; IMPACT; LCA; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-023-02148-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeThe rising of the sharing economy (SE) has lowered the barrier of purchase price to accessing many different products, thus changing the consumer decision paradigm. This paper addresses the challenge of assessing the life cycle impacts of SE systems in the context of this new consumer decision-making process. The paper proposes a methodological framework to integrate consumer preferences into the Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment (dynamic-LCA) of SE systems.MethodsIn the proposed consumer preference integrated dynamic-LCA (C-DLCA) methodological framework, system dynamics (SD) is used to combine consumer preference and the principal method, dynamic-LCA, which follows the ISO 14040 LCA framework. Choice-based conjoint analysis (CBCA) is chosen as the stated preference tool to measure consumer preference based on SE alternatives, attributes and attribute levels. CBCA integrates discrete choice experiments (DCE) and conjoint analysis features. Random utility theory is selected to interpret the CBCA results by employing multinomial logistics as the estimation procedure to derive the utilities. Derived utilities are connected in iterative modelling in the SD and LCA. Dynamic-LCA results are determined based on dynamic process inventory and DCE outcomes and then interpreted aligned with the SD policy scenarios.Results and discussionThe C-DLCA framework is applied to assess the GHG changes of the transition to car-based shared mobility in roundtrips to work in the USA. Carpooling and ridesourcing are selected as the shared mobility alternatives based on different occupancy behaviours. Powertrain system and body style are employed as the fleet technology attributes and the latter as an endogenous variable. Dynamic-LCA results are generated considering the high battery electrical vehicle (BEV) adoption as the policy scenario, and results are measured against a service-based functional unit, passenger-kilometre. The model outcomes show a significant reduction in aggregated personal mobility-related dynamic-GHG emissions by transitioning to car-based shared mobility. In contrast to the use phase GHG emissions, the production phase emissions show an increase. The results highlight the importance of integrating consumer preference and temporality in the SE environmental assessments.ConclusionsThe proposed C-DLCA framework is the first approach to combine consumer preferences, SD and LCA in a single formulation. The structured and practical integration of conjoint analysis, SD and LCA methods added some standardisation to the dynamic-LCAs of the SE systems, and the applicability is demonstrated. The C-DLCA framework is a fundamental structure to connect consumer preferences and temporal effects in LCAs that is expandable based on research scope.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 461
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using dynamic life cycle assessment to evaluate the effects of industry digitalization: A steel case study
    Astudillo, Miguel F.
    Kraemer, Kai
    Arteaga, Asier
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 28 (04) : 942 - 952
  • [32] Case Study of Life Cycle Assessment of Domestic Logs
    Hitoe, Kyoichiro
    Hasegawa, Takahiro
    Hasegawa, Kaori
    Terazawa, Kenji
    Yamanaka, Kazunori
    Hattori, Nobuaki
    MOKUZAI GAKKAISHI, 2013, 59 (05): : 269 - 277
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of a windshield wiper - A case study
    Dewulf, W
    Sas, P
    Van Brussel, H
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS DEGIGN AND INVERSE MANUFACTURING, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 120 - 123
  • [34] Life cycle assessment of flooring materials: Case study
    Jonsson, A
    Tillman, AM
    Svensson, T
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 32 (03) : 245 - 255
  • [35] Integration of energy audits in the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to improve the environmental performance assessment of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems
    Badiola, M.
    Basurko, O. C.
    Gabina, G.
    Mendiola, D.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 157 : 155 - 166
  • [37] Attributional and consequential life cycle assessments in a circular economy with integration of a quality indicator: A case study of cascading wood products
    Tanguay, Xavier
    Essoua Essoua, Gatien Geraud
    Amor, Ben
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 25 (06) : 1462 - 1473
  • [38] Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: A case study on building assessment
    Takano, Atsushi
    Winter, Stefan
    Hughes, Mark
    Linkosalmi, Lauri
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 79 : 20 - 30
  • [39] Integrating risk assessment and life cycle assessment: A case study of insulation
    Nishioka, Y
    Levy, JI
    Norris, GA
    Wilson, A
    Hofstetter, P
    Spengler, JD
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (05) : 1003 - 1017
  • [40] Spatial and territorial developments for life cycle assessment applied to urban mobility—case study on Lyon area in France
    Cyrille François
    Natacha Gondran
    Jean-Pierre Nicolas
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 543 - 560