Precise and efficient C-to-U RNA base editing with SNAP-CDAR-S

被引:8
|
作者
Latifi, Ngadhnjim [1 ]
Mack, Aline Maria [1 ]
Tellioglu, Irem [2 ,3 ]
Di Giorgio, Salvatore [2 ]
Stafforst, Thorsten [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Interfac Inst Biochem, Morgenstelle 15, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Immune Divers D150, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Fac Engn, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Tubingen, Gene & RNA Therapy Ctr GRTC, Fac Med, Tubingen, Germany
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
MOLECULAR-CLONING; SITE; MUTATIONS; PROTEINS;
D O I
10.1093/nar/gkad598
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Site-directed RNA base editing enables the transient and dosable change of genetic information and represents a recent strategy to manipulate cellular processes, paving ways to novel therapeutic modalities. While tools to introduce adenosine-to-inosine changes have been explored quite intensively, the engineering of precise and programmable tools for cytidine-to-uridine editing is somewhat lacking behind. Here we demonstrate that the cytidine deaminase domain evolved from the ADAR2 adenosine deaminase, taken from the RESCUE-S tool, provides very efficient and highly programmable editing when changing the RNA targeting mechanism from Cas13-based to SNAP-tag-based. Optimization of the guide RNA chemistry further allowed to dramatically improve editing yields in the difficult-to-edit 5 & PRIME;-CCN sequence context thus improving the substrate scope of the tool. Regarding editing efficiency, SNAP-CDAR-S outcompeted the RESCUE-S tool clearly on all tested targets, and was highly superior in perturbing the & beta;-catenin pathway. NGS analysis showed similar, moderate global off-target A-to-I and C-to-U editing for both tools.
引用
收藏
页码:E84 / E84
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The chloroplast and mitochondrial C-to-U RNA editing in Arabidopsis thaliana shows signals of adaptation
    Chu, Duan
    Wei, Lai
    PLANT DIRECT, 2019, 3 (09)
  • [22] The implications of APOBEC3-mediated C-to-U RNA editing for human disease
    Van Norden, Melissa
    Falls, Zackary
    Mandloi, Sapan
    Segal, Brahm H.
    Baysal, Bora E.
    Samudrala, Ram
    Elkin, Peter L.
    COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [23] Improvement of C-to-U RNA editing using an artificial MS2-APOBEC system
    Li, Jiarui
    Fan, Guangyao
    Sakari, Matomo
    Tsukahara, Toshifumi
    BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [24] Generation of G-to-A and C-to-U changes in HIV-1 transcripts by RNA editing
    Bourara, K
    Litvak, S
    Araya, A
    SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5484) : 1564 - 1566
  • [25] Plant mitochondrial RNA editing factors can perform targeted C-to-U editing of nuclear transcripts in human cells
    Lesch, Elena
    Schilling, Maximilian T.
    Brenner, Sarah
    Yang, Yingying
    Gruss, Oliver J.
    Knoop, Volker
    Schallenberg-Ruedinger, Mareike
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2022, 50 (17) : 9966 - 9983
  • [26] Fine-tuning of the PPR protein directs the RNA editing activity toward C-to-U or U-to-C conversion
    Ichinose, Mizuho
    Teramoto, Takamasa
    Nakamura, Izumi
    Shimajiri, Yasuka
    Yagi, Yusuke
    Gutmann, Bernard
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [27] Systematic analysis reveals cis and trans determinants affecting C-to-U RNA editing in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Duan Chu
    Lai Wei
    BMC Genetics, 21
  • [28] A-to-I and C-to-U editing within transfer RNAs
    A. A. H. Su
    L. Randau
    Biochemistry (Moscow), 2011, 76 : 932 - 937
  • [29] RNA Editors, Cofactors, and mRNA Targets: An Overview of the C-to-U RNA Editing Machinery and Its Implication in Human Disease
    Lerner, Taga
    Papavasiliou, F. Nina
    Pecori, Riccardo
    GENES, 2019, 10 (01):
  • [30] Systematic analysis reveals cis and trans determinants affecting C-to-U RNA editing inArabidopsis thaliana
    Chu, Duan
    Wei, Lai
    BMC GENETICS, 2020, 21 (01)