Noninvasive camera data and spatial capture-recapture models reveal strong temporal variation in fawn survival

被引:2
|
作者
Engebretsen, Kristin N. [1 ,5 ]
Cherry, Michael J. [2 ]
Conner, L. Mike [3 ]
Garrison, Elina P. [4 ]
Miller, Karl V. [1 ]
Chandler, Richard B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Kingsville, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Res Inst, Kingsville, TX USA
[3] Jones Ctr Ichauway, Newton, GA USA
[4] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Utah State Univ, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2023年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
camera trap; Florida; neonate survival; noninvasive methods; Odocoileus virginianus; open population model; SCR; spatiotemporal variation; WHITE-TAILED DEER; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; HABITAT USE; PREDATION; RISK; RECRUITMENT; INFERENCE; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.4497
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In south Florida, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are the primary prey of the endangered Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Deer populations in some regions of south Florida have declined in recent years, and the role of fawn survival and recruitment in these declines is unknown. Determining known-fate survival of fawns is challenging, requires invasive and costly methods, and often has a limited geographic scope. We deployed 180 cameras throughout the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge and the Big Cypress National Preserve to understand how environmental variables influence fawn survival. We identified 271 fawns from 12,715 photographs in 2015 and 2016. We utilized a noninvasive sampling method coupled with a spatial capture-recapture model to estimate the number of fawns born, the spatial distribution of birth locations, and the number of fawns that survived to recruitment (180 days old) during two fawning seasons. We found strong evidence of temporal variation in survival, but little evidence of spatial variation. Within the 10,941-ha study area, we estimated that 305 (95% CI: 245-385) fawns were born in 2015 and 278 (212-381) fawns were born in 2016. In 2015, 36% (110) of the estimated 305 fawns survived to 180 days. However, in 2016, only 13% (36) of the estimated 278 fawns survived to 180 days. The large difference in recruitment between years was likely driven by record flooding in 2016. Our data suggest that extreme weather events, coupled with high adult mortality, likely contributed to recent deer population decline in south Florida through reduced fawn recruitment. Unlike studies of known-fate fawn survival that require labor-intensive and invasive capture of both adults and neonates, our approach relies exclusively on camera data, which makes it possible to conduct studies over broad spatiotemporal scales in challenging environments to illuminate the drivers of variation in juvenile survival.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Capture-recapture models with heterogeneity to study survival senescence in the wild
    Peron, Guillaume
    Crochet, Pierre-Andre
    Choquet, Remi
    Pradel, Roger
    Lebreton, Jean-Dominique
    Gimenez, Olivier
    OIKOS, 2010, 119 (03) : 524 - 532
  • [22] Spatial capture-recapture models allowing Markovian transience or dispersal
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Fuller, Angela K.
    Sutherland, Chris
    POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2016, 58 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [23] CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS ALLOWING FOR AGE-DEPENDENT SURVIVAL AND CAPTURE RATES
    POLLOCK, KH
    BIOMETRICS, 1981, 37 (03) : 521 - 529
  • [24] ipsecr: An R package for awkward spatial capture-recapture data
    Efford, Murray G.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 14 (05): : 1182 - 1189
  • [25] Augmenting Superpopulation Capture-Recapture Models with Population Assignment Data
    Wen, Zhi
    Pollock, Kenneth
    Nichols, James
    Waser, Peter
    BIOMETRICS, 2011, 67 (03) : 691 - 700
  • [26] Mixture Regression Models for Closed Population Capture-Recapture Data
    Tounkara, Fode
    Rivest, Louis-Paul
    BIOMETRICS, 2015, 71 (03) : 721 - 730
  • [27] Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications
    Smith, Jennifer B.
    Stevens, Bryan S.
    Etter, Dwayne R.
    Williams, David M.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [28] Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations
    Theng, Meryl
    Milleret, Cyril
    Bracis, Chloe
    Cassey, Phillip
    Delean, Steven
    ECOLOGY, 2022, 103 (10)
  • [29] Efficient estimation of large-scale spatial capture-recapture models
    Turek, Daniel
    Milleret, Cyril
    Ergon, Torbjorn
    Broseth, Henrik
    Dupont, Pierre
    Bischof, Richard
    De Valpine, Perry
    ECOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (02):
  • [30] Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models
    Milleret, Cyril
    Dupont, Pierre
    Chipperfield, Joseph
    Turek, Daniel
    Broseth, Henrik
    Gimenez, Olivier
    de Valpine, Perry
    Bischof, Richard
    ECOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (07):