Noninvasive camera data and spatial capture-recapture models reveal strong temporal variation in fawn survival

被引:2
|
作者
Engebretsen, Kristin N. [1 ,5 ]
Cherry, Michael J. [2 ]
Conner, L. Mike [3 ]
Garrison, Elina P. [4 ]
Miller, Karl V. [1 ]
Chandler, Richard B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ Kingsville, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Res Inst, Kingsville, TX USA
[3] Jones Ctr Ichauway, Newton, GA USA
[4] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Utah State Univ, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2023年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
camera trap; Florida; neonate survival; noninvasive methods; Odocoileus virginianus; open population model; SCR; spatiotemporal variation; WHITE-TAILED DEER; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; HABITAT USE; PREDATION; RISK; RECRUITMENT; INFERENCE; AGE;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.4497
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In south Florida, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) are the primary prey of the endangered Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Deer populations in some regions of south Florida have declined in recent years, and the role of fawn survival and recruitment in these declines is unknown. Determining known-fate survival of fawns is challenging, requires invasive and costly methods, and often has a limited geographic scope. We deployed 180 cameras throughout the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge and the Big Cypress National Preserve to understand how environmental variables influence fawn survival. We identified 271 fawns from 12,715 photographs in 2015 and 2016. We utilized a noninvasive sampling method coupled with a spatial capture-recapture model to estimate the number of fawns born, the spatial distribution of birth locations, and the number of fawns that survived to recruitment (180 days old) during two fawning seasons. We found strong evidence of temporal variation in survival, but little evidence of spatial variation. Within the 10,941-ha study area, we estimated that 305 (95% CI: 245-385) fawns were born in 2015 and 278 (212-381) fawns were born in 2016. In 2015, 36% (110) of the estimated 305 fawns survived to 180 days. However, in 2016, only 13% (36) of the estimated 278 fawns survived to 180 days. The large difference in recruitment between years was likely driven by record flooding in 2016. Our data suggest that extreme weather events, coupled with high adult mortality, likely contributed to recent deer population decline in south Florida through reduced fawn recruitment. Unlike studies of known-fate fawn survival that require labor-intensive and invasive capture of both adults and neonates, our approach relies exclusively on camera data, which makes it possible to conduct studies over broad spatiotemporal scales in challenging environments to illuminate the drivers of variation in juvenile survival.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial Capture-Recapture Models
    Borchers, David
    Fewster, Rachel
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (02) : 219 - 232
  • [2] Spatial capture-recapture models for search-encounter data
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Kery, Marc
    Guelat, Jerome
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2011, 2 (06): : 602 - 611
  • [3] Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Karanth, K. Ullas
    Gopalaswamy, Arjun M.
    Kumar, N. Samba
    ECOLOGY, 2009, 90 (11) : 3233 - 3244
  • [4] Combining camera-trapping and noninvasive genetic data in a spatial capture-recapture framework improves density estimates for the jaguar
    Sollmann, Rahel
    Torres, Natalia Mundim
    Furtado, Mariana Malzoni
    de Almeida Jacomo, Anah Tereza
    Palomares, Francisco
    Roques, Severine
    Silveira, Leandro
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 167 : 242 - 247
  • [5] Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture-recapture models
    Jimenez, Jose
    Diaz-Ruiz, Francisco
    Monterroso, Pedro
    Tobajas, Jorge
    Ferreras, Pablo
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [6] A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Young, Kevin V.
    ECOLOGY, 2008, 89 (08) : 2281 - 2289
  • [7] SPATIAL CAPTURE-RECAPTURE WITH PARTIAL IDENTITY: AN APPLICATION TO CAMERA TRAPS
    Augustine, Ben C.
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Kelly, Marcella J.
    Satter, Christopher B.
    Alonso, Robert S.
    Boydston, Erin E.
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 12 (01): : 67 - 95
  • [8] Mixture models for capture-recapture count data
    Böhning D.
    Dietz E.
    Kuhnert R.
    Schön D.
    Statistical Methods and Applications, 2005, 14 (1) : 29 - 43
  • [9] The applications of capture-recapture models to epidemiological data
    Chao, A
    Tsay, PK
    Lin, SH
    Shau, WY
    Chao, DY
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (20) : 3123 - 3157
  • [10] Bayesian model selection for spatial capture-recapture models
    Dey, Soumen
    Delampady, Mohan
    Gopalaswamy, Arjun M.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (20): : 11569 - 11583