Statistical Comparison of Various Dayside Magnetopause Reconnection X-Line Prediction Models

被引:3
|
作者
Qudsi, Ramiz A. [1 ]
Walsh, Brian M. [1 ]
Broll, Jeff [2 ]
Atz, Emil [1 ]
Haaland, Stein [3 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Ctr Space Phys, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM USA
[3] Univ Ctr Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway
关键词
reconnection; dayside; magnetopause; MMS; magnetosheath; solar wind; EARTHS MAGNETOPAUSE; MAGNETOSPHERE;
D O I
10.1029/2023JA031644
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Reconnection at Earth's magnetopause drives magnetospheric convection and provides mass and energy input into the magnetosphere/ionosphere system thereby driving the coupling between solar wind and terrestrial magnetosphere. Despite its importance, the factors governing the location of dayside magnetopause reconnection are not well understood. Though a few models can predict X-line locations reasonably well, the underlying physics is still unresolved. In this study we present results from a comparative analysis of 274 magnetic reconnection events as observed by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission to determine what quantities affect the accuracy of such models and are most strongly associated with the occurrence of dayside magnetopause reconnection. We also attempt to determine under what upstream solar wind conditions each global X-line model becomes least reliable.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resistive magnetohydrodynamic simulations of X-line retreat during magnetic reconnection
    Murphy, N. A.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2010, 17 (11)
  • [42] Secondary Reconnection Between Interlinked Flux Tubes Driven by Magnetic Reconnection With a Short X-Line
    Huang, Kai
    Lu, Quanming
    Liu, Yi-Hsin
    Lu, San
    Li, Xinmin
    Tang, Huibo
    Peng, E.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 51 (23)
  • [43] Electron Distribution Functions Around a Reconnection X-Line Resolved by the FOTE Method
    Wang, Z.
    Fu, H. S.
    Liu, C. M.
    Liu, Y. Y.
    Cozzani, G.
    Giles, B. L.
    Hwang, K-J
    Burch, J. L.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 46 (03) : 1195 - 1204
  • [44] Magnetic reconnection X-line retreat associated with dipolarization of the Earth's magnetosphere
    Oka, M.
    Phan, T. -D.
    Eastwood, J. P.
    Angelopoulos, V.
    Murphy, N. A.
    Oieroset, M.
    Miyashita, Y.
    Fujimoto, M.
    McFadden, J.
    Larson, D.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 38
  • [45] The Nonorthogonal X-line in a Small Guide-field Reconnection Event in the Magnetotail
    Qi, Yi
    Ergun, Robert
    Pathak, Neha
    Li, Tak Chu
    Eriksson, Stefan
    Chasapis, Alexandros
    Schwartz, Steven J.
    Ahmadi, Narges
    Vo, Tien
    Newman, David
    Usanova, Maria
    Wilder, Frederick D.
    Shuster, Jason
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 950 (02):
  • [46] Kinetic signatures of the region surrounding the X line in asymmetric (magnetopause) reconnection
    Shay, M. A.
    Phan, T. D.
    Haggerty, C. C.
    Fujimoto, M.
    Drake, J. F.
    Malakit, K.
    Cassak, P. A.
    Swisdak, M.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (09) : 4145 - 4154
  • [47] Spacecraft measurements constraining the spatial extent of a magnetopause reconnection X line
    Walsh, B. M.
    Komar, C. M.
    Pfau-Kempf, Y.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 44 (07) : 3038 - 3046
  • [48] Ion Larmor radius effects near a reconnection X line at the magnetopause: THEMIS observations and simulation comparison
    Phan, T. D.
    Shay, M. A.
    Haggerty, C. C.
    Gosling, J. T.
    Eastwood, J. P.
    Fujimoto, M.
    Malakit, K.
    Mozer, F. S.
    Cassak, P. A.
    Oieroset, M.
    Angelopoulos, V.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (17) : 8844 - 8852
  • [49] Remote sensing of a magnetotail reconnection X-line using polar rain electrons
    Alexeev, I. V.
    Sergeev, V.
    Owen, C. J.
    Fazakerley, A.
    Lucek, E.
    Reme, H.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (19)
  • [50] Spatial evolution of magnetic reconnection diffusion region structures with distance from the X-line
    Oieroset, M.
    Phan, T. D.
    Ergun, R.
    Ahmadi, N.
    Genestreti, K.
    Drake, J. F.
    Liu, Y-H
    Haggerty, C.
    Eastwood, J. P.
    Shay, M. A.
    Pyakurel, P. S.
    Haaland, S.
    Oka, M.
    Goodbred, M.
    Eriksson, S.
    Burch, J. L.
    Torbert, R. B.
    Khotyaintsev, Y.
    Russell, C. T.
    Strangeway, R. J.
    Gershman, D. J.
    Giles, B. L.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2021, 28 (12)