Optimal economic and environmental design of multi-energy systems

被引:25
|
作者
Terlouw, Tom [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gabrielli, Paolo [1 ,4 ]
AlSkaif, Tarek [5 ]
Bauer, Christian [3 ]
McKenna, Russell [2 ,6 ]
Mazzotti, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Energy & Proc Engn, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Energy & Proc Engn, Chair Energy Syst Anal, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Lab Energy Syst Anal, Technol Assessment Grp, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[4] Carnegie Inst Sci, Dept Global Ecol, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Wageningen Univ & Res, Informat Technol Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[6] Lab Energy Syst Anal, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
关键词
Multi-energy systems; Life cycle assessment; Techno-economic assessment; Mixed integer linear program; Decarbonization; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; STORAGE-SYSTEMS; ENERGY-STORAGE; HEAT; TECHNOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK; BARRIERS; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121374
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Designing decentralized energy systems in an optimal way can substantially reduce costs and environmental burdens. However, most models for the optimal design of multi-energy systems (MESs) exclude a comprehensive environmental assessment and consider limited technology options for relevant energy-intensive sectors, such as the industrial and mobility sectors. This paper presents a multi-objective optimization framework for designing MESs, which includes life cycle environmental burdens and considers a wide portfolio of technology options for residential, mobility, and industrial sectors. The optimization problem is formulated as a mixed integer linear program that minimizes costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while meeting the energy demands of given end-users. Whereas our MESs optimization framework can be applied for a large range of boundary conditions, the geographical island Eigeroy (Norway) is used as a showcase as it includes substantial industrial activities. Results demonstrate that, when properly designed, MESs are already cost-competitive with incumbent energy systems, and significant reductions in the amount of natural gas (92%) and GHG emissions (73%) can be obtained with a marginal cost increase (18%). Stricter decarbonization targets incur larger costs. A broad portfolio of technologies is deployed when minimizing GHG emissions and integrating the industrial sector. Environmental trade-offs are identified when considering the construction phase of energy technologies. Therefore, we argue that (i) MES designs and assessments require a thorough life cycle assessment beyond GHG emissions, and (ii) the entire life cycle should be considered when designing MESs, with the construction phase contributing up to 80% of specific environmental impact categories.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal Design and Operation of Regional Multi-Energy Systems With High Renewable Penetration Considering Reliability Constraints
    Zhang, Mingli
    Zhang, Na
    Guan, Duojiao
    Ye, Peng
    Song, Kun
    Pan, Xiao
    Wang, Huan
    Cheng, Mengzeng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 205307 - 205315
  • [32] Optimal Design and Operation of a Low Carbon Community Based Multi-Energy Systems Considering EV Integration
    Cao, Jun
    Crozier, Constance
    McCulloch, Malcolm
    Fan, Zhong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 10 (03) : 1217 - 1226
  • [33] A Dual Splitting Method for Distributed Economic Dispatch in Multi-energy Systems
    Wang, Zhibin
    Xu, Jinming
    Zhu, Shanying
    Chen, Cailian
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 12566 - 12571
  • [34] Electrochemical conversion technologies for optimal design of decentralized multi-energy systems: Modeling framework and technology assessment
    Gabrielli, Paolo
    Gazzani, Matteo
    Mazzotti, Marco
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 221 : 557 - 575
  • [35] Economic and environmental assessment of multi-energy microgrids under a hybrid optimization technique
    Ding, Xiaonan
    Guo, Qun
    Tian, Qiannan
    Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 65
  • [36] Economic efficiency and carbon emissions in multi-energy systems with flexible buildings
    Hurwitz, Zachary L.
    Dubief, Yves
    Almassalkhi, Mads
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2020, 123
  • [37] Optimal planning of multi-energy microgrid with different energy storages and demand responsive loads utilizing a technical-economic-environmental programming
    Nosratabadi, Seyyed Mostafa
    Hemmati, Reza
    Khajouei Gharaei, Pouria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 45 (05) : 6985 - 7017
  • [38] Sustainable mega-seaports with integrated multi-energy systems: Life-cycle environmental and economic evaluation
    Tang, Daogui
    Chen, Zhe Zhe
    Zhao, Wuyou
    Yuan, Yupeng
    Yuan, Chengqing
    Guerrero, Josep M.
    Zio, Enrico
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 478
  • [39] Resilience-aware Optimal Design and Energy Management Scheme of Multi-energy Microgrids
    Masrur, Hasan
    Islam, Md Rabiul
    Muttaqi, Kashem M.
    Gamil, Mahmoud M.
    Huang, Yongyi
    Senjyu, Tomonobu
    2021 IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS SOCIETY ANNUAL MEETING (IAS), 2021,
  • [40] Economic and environmental optimal design of a multi-vector energy hub feeding a Local Energy Community
    Piazza, Giorgio
    Delfino, Federico
    Bergero, Stefano
    Di Somma, Marialaura
    Graditi, Giorgio
    Bracco, Stefano
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 347