Impact of national commissioning of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) on equity of access in England: a PrEP-to-need ratio investigation

被引:3
|
作者
Coukan, Flavien [1 ,2 ]
Sullivan, Ann [3 ,4 ]
Mitchell, Holly [5 ]
Jaffer, Sajjida [6 ]
Williams, Andy [7 ]
Saunders, John [5 ,8 ]
Atchison, Christina [2 ,9 ]
Ward, Helen [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Natl Inst Hlth Res Appl Res Collaborat North West, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Patient Experience Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, London, England
[3] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, London, England
[5] Sexually Transmitted Infect STI & HIV Div, Blood Safety Hepatitis Sexually Transmitted Infect, London, England
[6] Royal Marsden Hosp, London, England
[7] Royal London Hosp, London, England
[8] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, UCL Ctr Clin Res Infect & Sexual Hlth, London, England
[9] Natl Inst Hlth Res Imperial Biomed Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
HIV; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Delivery of Health Care; National Health Programs; MEN;
D O I
10.1136/sextrans-2023-055989
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV acquisition. In England, NHS availability was limited to participants of the PrEP Impact Trial until late 2020. Some key populations at greater risk of HIV were under-represented in the trial suggesting inequities in trial PrEP access. We used the PrEP-to-need ratio (PnR; number of PrEP users divided by new HIV diagnoses) to investigate whether PrEP access improved following routine commissioning in October 2020 and identify populations most underserved by PrEP. Methods Aggregated numbers of people receiving >= 1 PrEP prescription and non-late new HIV diagnoses (epidemiological proxy for PrEP need) were taken from national surveillance data sets. We calculated the PnR across socio-demographics during Impact (October 2017 to February 2020; pre-COVID-19 pandemic) and post-commissioning PrEP era (2021) in England. Results PnR increased >11 fold, from 4.2 precommissioning to 48.9 in 2021, due to a fourfold reduction in non-late new HIV diagnoses and near threefold increase in PrEP users. PnR increased across genders, however, the men's PnR increased 12-fold (from 5.4 precommissioning to 63.9 postcommissioning) while the women's increased sevenfold (0.5 to 3.5). This increasing gender-based inequity was observed across age, ethnicity and region of residence: white men had the highest PnR, increasing >13 fold (7.1 to 96.0), while Black African women consistently had the lowest PnR, only increasing slightly (0.1 to 0.3) postcommissioning, suggesting they were the most underserved group. Precommissioning, the PnR was 78-fold higher among white men than Black women, increasing to 278-fold postcommissioning. Conclusions Despite the overall increase in PrEP use, substantial PrEP Impact trial inequities widened postcommissioning in England, particularly across gender, ethnicity and region of residence. This study emphasises the need to guide HIV combination prevention based on equity metrics relative to the HIV epidemic. The PnR could support the optimisation of combination prevention to achieve zero new HIV infections in England by 2030.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 172
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Medication Scales with Youth on PrEP: PrEP Confidence Scale and PrEP Difficulties Scale
    Budhwani, Henna
    Yigit, Ibrahim
    Maragh-Bass, Allysha C.
    Rainer, Crissi B.
    Claude, Kristina
    Muessig, Kathryn E.
    Hightow-Weidman, Lisa B.
    AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2022, 36 (11) : 443 - 450
  • [32] Characterizing the Impact of COVID-19 on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Care
    Rogers, Brooke G.
    Tao, Jun
    Maynard, Michaela
    Chu, Christina
    Silva, Elizabeth
    Toma, Emily
    Nagel, Katherine
    Napoleon, Siena
    Chan, Philip A.
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2021, 25 (11) : 3754 - 3757
  • [33] Characterizing the Impact of COVID-19 on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Care
    Brooke G. Rogers
    Jun Tao
    Michaela Maynard
    Christina Chu
    Elizabeth Silva
    Emily Toma
    Katherine Nagel
    Siena Napoleon
    Philip A. Chan
    AIDS and Behavior, 2021, 25 : 3754 - 3757
  • [34] Ambivalence and the biopolitics of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation
    Gaspar, Mark
    Salway, Travis
    Grace, Daniel
    SOCIAL THEORY & HEALTH, 2022, 20 (02) : 171 - 187
  • [35] A Thematic Analysis of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) YouTube Videos
    Kecojevic, Aleksandar
    Meleo-Erwin, Zoe C.
    Basch, Corey H.
    Hammouda, Mariam
    JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 2021, 68 (11) : 1877 - 1898
  • [36] Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) monitoring in a larger teaching hospital
    Todd, S.
    Bell, L.
    Emerson, C.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2018, 19 : S57 - S57
  • [37] Getting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to the people: opportunities, challenges and emerging models of PrEP implementation
    Sullivan, Patrick S.
    Siegler, Aaron J.
    SEXUAL HEALTH, 2018, 15 (06) : 522 - 527
  • [38] SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PREP) AND ASSOCIATIONS WITH PREP STIGMA, INTENTIONS, AND USE
    Walsh, Jennifer L.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S604 - S604
  • [39] Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Information on Instagram: Content Analysis
    Walsh-Buhi, Eric
    Houghton, Rebecca Fagen
    Lange, Claire
    Hockensmith, Ryli
    Ferrand, John
    Martinez, Lourdes
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (07):
  • [40] HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)-A Quantitative Ethics Appraisal
    Kokolo, Madzouka B.
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Cameron, D. William
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08):