Impact of national commissioning of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) on equity of access in England: a PrEP-to-need ratio investigation

被引:3
|
作者
Coukan, Flavien [1 ,2 ]
Sullivan, Ann [3 ,4 ]
Mitchell, Holly [5 ]
Jaffer, Sajjida [6 ]
Williams, Andy [7 ]
Saunders, John [5 ,8 ]
Atchison, Christina [2 ,9 ]
Ward, Helen [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Natl Inst Hlth Res Appl Res Collaborat North West, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Patient Experience Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, London, England
[3] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, London, England
[5] Sexually Transmitted Infect STI & HIV Div, Blood Safety Hepatitis Sexually Transmitted Infect, London, England
[6] Royal Marsden Hosp, London, England
[7] Royal London Hosp, London, England
[8] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, UCL Ctr Clin Res Infect & Sexual Hlth, London, England
[9] Natl Inst Hlth Res Imperial Biomed Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
HIV; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Delivery of Health Care; National Health Programs; MEN;
D O I
10.1136/sextrans-2023-055989
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV acquisition. In England, NHS availability was limited to participants of the PrEP Impact Trial until late 2020. Some key populations at greater risk of HIV were under-represented in the trial suggesting inequities in trial PrEP access. We used the PrEP-to-need ratio (PnR; number of PrEP users divided by new HIV diagnoses) to investigate whether PrEP access improved following routine commissioning in October 2020 and identify populations most underserved by PrEP. Methods Aggregated numbers of people receiving >= 1 PrEP prescription and non-late new HIV diagnoses (epidemiological proxy for PrEP need) were taken from national surveillance data sets. We calculated the PnR across socio-demographics during Impact (October 2017 to February 2020; pre-COVID-19 pandemic) and post-commissioning PrEP era (2021) in England. Results PnR increased >11 fold, from 4.2 precommissioning to 48.9 in 2021, due to a fourfold reduction in non-late new HIV diagnoses and near threefold increase in PrEP users. PnR increased across genders, however, the men's PnR increased 12-fold (from 5.4 precommissioning to 63.9 postcommissioning) while the women's increased sevenfold (0.5 to 3.5). This increasing gender-based inequity was observed across age, ethnicity and region of residence: white men had the highest PnR, increasing >13 fold (7.1 to 96.0), while Black African women consistently had the lowest PnR, only increasing slightly (0.1 to 0.3) postcommissioning, suggesting they were the most underserved group. Precommissioning, the PnR was 78-fold higher among white men than Black women, increasing to 278-fold postcommissioning. Conclusions Despite the overall increase in PrEP use, substantial PrEP Impact trial inequities widened postcommissioning in England, particularly across gender, ethnicity and region of residence. This study emphasises the need to guide HIV combination prevention based on equity metrics relative to the HIV epidemic. The PnR could support the optimisation of combination prevention to achieve zero new HIV infections in England by 2030.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 172
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The increasing equity gaps of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) access following its commissioning in England - a PrEP-to-need ratio investigation
    Coukan, Flavien
    Sullivan, Ann
    Mitchell, Holly
    Jaffer, Sajjida
    Williams, Andy
    Saunders, John
    Atchison, Christina
    Ward, Helen
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2023, 99 (SUPPL_1) : A10 - A11
  • [2] Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
    Bradshaw, Helen
    HIV MEDICINE, 2021, 22 : 47 - 47
  • [3] National leadership needed on HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) access in Australia
    Haire, Bridget
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 40 (06) : 504 - 505
  • [4] Distance travelled to access pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention on the PrEP Impact trial in England during 2017-2020
    Mason, E.
    Osman, R.
    Hibbert, M.
    Enayat, Q.
    Mitchell, H.
    Chiavenna, C.
    Saunders, J.
    Sullivan, A.
    Chhibbar, P.
    Golombek, R.
    McCormack, S.
    Desai, M.
    Manavi, K.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2021, 22 : 47 - 48
  • [5] HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
    Tumarkin, Ethan
    Siedner, Mark J.
    Bogoch, Isaac I.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 364
  • [6] Rectal pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
    Rohan, Lisa C.
    Yang, Haitao
    Wang, Lin
    ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH, 2013, 100 : S17 - S24
  • [7] The impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and screening on the dynamics of HIV
    Pinto, Carla M. A.
    Carvalho, Ana R. M.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2018, 339 : 231 - 244
  • [8] HIV seroconversion during pregnancy and the need for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
    Zorrilla, Carmen D.
    Baez, Fiorella Reyes
    Colon, Karolyn Gonzalez
    Ibarra, Jessica
    Garcia, Iris
    Mosquera, Ana M.
    HIV AIDS-RESEARCH AND PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 10 : 57 - 61
  • [9] PrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention
    Page, Matthew
    Nicholls, Jane
    TRENDS IN UROLOGY & MENS HEALTH, 2018, 9 (04) : 22 - 24
  • [10] Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and 'risk' in the news
    Collins, Luke C.
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (03) : 379 - 394