Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: experience in Switzerland

被引:5
|
作者
Haner, Jonas D. [1 ]
Raber, Lorenz [1 ]
Moro, Christina [1 ]
Losdat, Sylvain [2 ]
Windecker, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, CTU Bern, Bern, Switzerland
来源
关键词
robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention; procedural success; manual assistance; manual conversion; Swiss experience; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY; EXPOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1294930
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims of the study: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) exposes operators to ionizing radiation. Robotic-assisted PCI (RA-PCI) is a novel technology that enables interventional cardiologists to operate coronary devices remotely from a radiation-shed cockpit. The aim of this study is to describe the experience and challenges during the initiation of a RA-PCI program and to report outcomes of the first 21 patients undergoing RA-PCI in Switzerland.Methods: All patients undergoing RA-PCI using the CorPath GRX Vascular Robotic System between 06/2021 and 12/2021 at Inselspital, Bern University Hospital were included in this retrospective registry study. Baseline, procedural and clinical follow-up data were prospectively assessed as part of the Cardiobase Bern PCI registry (NCT02241291). The two endpoints of interest were clinical success [defined as <30% residual diameter stenosis in the absence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of death, periprocedural myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and stroke)] and robotic success (defined as clinical success and completion of RA-PCI without or with partial manual assistance). Additional outcome measures include clinical long-term outcomes at one year.Results: Twenty-five lesions in 21 patients were treated with RA-PCI (age 62.4 +/- 9.1 years, 24% female). Clinical success was achieved in 100%, and robotic success in 81% (17/21 procedures, including 4 procedures requiring partial manual assistance). Manual conversion (e.g. manual completion of the procedure) occurred in 19% (4 procedures). Reasons for manual assistance or conversion were poor guiding-catheter back-up or platform limitations (4), adverse events (2x transient slow-flow that was solved manually), safety decision (1x vasovagal reaction not related to robotic approach), and software error (1). No in-hospital MACE occurred. During 12 months of follow-up, one patient suffered a non-target-vessel myocardial infarction requiring repeat PCI.Conclusions: RA-PCI can safely be performed without clinically relevant robot-associated complications in selected patients with approximately 80% of procedures conducted without or with partial manual assistance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Periprocedural and 30-day outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention used in the intravascular imaging guidance
    Koeda, Yorihiko
    Ishida, Masaru
    Sasaki, Koto
    Kikuchi, Sayaka
    Yamaya, Shohei
    Tsuji, Keiko
    Ishisone, Takenori
    Goto, Iwao
    Kimura, Takumi
    Shimoda, Yudai
    Doi, Akio
    Morino, Yoshihiro
    CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 38 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [32] Robotic-Assisted Hybrid Coronary Revascularization
    Ballotta, Andrea
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 221
  • [33] Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report
    Smitson, Christopher
    Ang, Lawrence
    Reeves, Ryan
    Patel, Mitul
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B55 - B56
  • [34] Robotic-assisted appendicovesicostomy: An initial experience
    Storm, Douglas W.
    Fulmer, Brant R.
    Stumfest, Joel M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A28 - A28
  • [35] Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic-Assisted versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
    Mehanna, Emile
    Bezerra, Hiram
    Metzger, D. Christopher
    Caputo, Ronald
    Granada, Juan
    Vetrovec, George W.
    Weisz, Giora
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (15) : B197 - B197
  • [36] Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report
    Smitson, Christopher C.
    Ang, Lawrence
    Pourdjabbar, Ali
    Reeves, Ryan
    Patel, Mitul
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 30 (04): : 152 - 156
  • [37] Long Distance Tele-Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of First-in-Human Experience
    Patel, Tejas M.
    Shah, Sanjay C.
    Pancholy, Samir B.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2019, 14 : 53 - 58
  • [38] Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting
    Zapata, David S.
    Halkos, Michael E.
    APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [39] Initial Report of Safety and Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Chronic Total Occlusion Coronary Intervention
    Hirai, Taishi
    Kearney, Kathleen
    Kataruka, Akash
    Gosch, Kensey
    Brandt, Hunter
    Nicholson, William
    Salisbury, Adam
    Grantham, J. Aaron
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (13) : B220 - B220
  • [40] Robotic-assisted transradial diagnostic coronary angiography
    Swaminathan, Rajesh, V
    Rao, Sunil, V
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 92 (01) : 54 - 57