Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: experience in Switzerland

被引:5
|
作者
Haner, Jonas D. [1 ]
Raber, Lorenz [1 ]
Moro, Christina [1 ]
Losdat, Sylvain [2 ]
Windecker, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, CTU Bern, Bern, Switzerland
来源
关键词
robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention; procedural success; manual assistance; manual conversion; Swiss experience; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY; EXPOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1294930
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims of the study: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) exposes operators to ionizing radiation. Robotic-assisted PCI (RA-PCI) is a novel technology that enables interventional cardiologists to operate coronary devices remotely from a radiation-shed cockpit. The aim of this study is to describe the experience and challenges during the initiation of a RA-PCI program and to report outcomes of the first 21 patients undergoing RA-PCI in Switzerland.Methods: All patients undergoing RA-PCI using the CorPath GRX Vascular Robotic System between 06/2021 and 12/2021 at Inselspital, Bern University Hospital were included in this retrospective registry study. Baseline, procedural and clinical follow-up data were prospectively assessed as part of the Cardiobase Bern PCI registry (NCT02241291). The two endpoints of interest were clinical success [defined as <30% residual diameter stenosis in the absence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of death, periprocedural myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, and stroke)] and robotic success (defined as clinical success and completion of RA-PCI without or with partial manual assistance). Additional outcome measures include clinical long-term outcomes at one year.Results: Twenty-five lesions in 21 patients were treated with RA-PCI (age 62.4 +/- 9.1 years, 24% female). Clinical success was achieved in 100%, and robotic success in 81% (17/21 procedures, including 4 procedures requiring partial manual assistance). Manual conversion (e.g. manual completion of the procedure) occurred in 19% (4 procedures). Reasons for manual assistance or conversion were poor guiding-catheter back-up or platform limitations (4), adverse events (2x transient slow-flow that was solved manually), safety decision (1x vasovagal reaction not related to robotic approach), and software error (1). No in-hospital MACE occurred. During 12 months of follow-up, one patient suffered a non-target-vessel myocardial infarction requiring repeat PCI.Conclusions: RA-PCI can safely be performed without clinically relevant robot-associated complications in selected patients with approximately 80% of procedures conducted without or with partial manual assistance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First Experience in Switzerland
    Haner, Jonas
    Raber, Lorenz
    Losdat, Sylvain
    Windecker, Stephan
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2023, 153 : 120S - 120S
  • [2] Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Lo N.
    Gutierrez J.A.
    Swaminathan R.V.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2018, 20 (2)
  • [3] Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention
    Mangels, Daniel R.
    Giri, Jay
    Hirshfeld, John
    Wilensky, Robert L.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (06) : 948 - 955
  • [4] First Experience of Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan
    Kagiyama, Koutaro
    Ueno, Takafumi
    Mitsutake, Yoshiaki
    Yamaji, Kazunori
    Ishimatsu, Takashi
    Sasaki, Ken-ichiro
    Fukumoto, Yoshihiro
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 58 (23) : 3415 - 3419
  • [5] Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: the future or the past?
    Durand, Eric
    Eltchaninoff, Helene
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2024, 20 (01) : 19 - 20
  • [6] Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Rise of the Machines
    Gruberg, Luis
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 43 : 120 - 122
  • [7] Manual support during robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention
    Bay, Benjamin
    Gossling, Alina
    Rilinger, Jonathan
    von zur Muehlen, Constantin
    Hofmann, Felix
    Nef, Holger
    Moellmann, Helge
    Kellner, Caroline
    Seiffert, Moritz
    Brunner, Fabian J.
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [8] Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Proceed With Caution Reply
    Granada, Juan F.
    Weisz, Giora
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (08) : 936 - 936
  • [9] Regulatory Review of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan
    Shiba, Takeshi
    Aizawa, Koichi
    Ho, Mami
    Ishii, Kensuke
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2024, 88 (11) : 1737 - 1744
  • [10] Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—Filling an Unmet Need
    Joseph P. Carrozza
    Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, 2012, 5 : 62 - 66