Joint optimization of load balancing and resource allocation in cloud environment using optimal container management strategy

被引:0
|
作者
Muniswamy, Saravanan [1 ,2 ]
Vignesh, Radhakrishnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Presidency Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn & Informat Sci, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[2] Presidency Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn & Informat Sci, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Bengaluru 560064, Karnataka, India
来源
关键词
container cloud environment; container management; load balancing; recurrent neural networks; resource allocation; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; INTERNET-OF-THINGS; SERVICE; FRAMEWORK; PLACEMENT; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1002/cpe.8035
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Due to the high performance of cloud computing-based microservices, a wide range of industries and fields rely on them. In a containerized cloud, traditional resource management strategies are typically used to allocate and migrate virtual machines. A major problem for cloud service providers is resource allocation for containers, which directly affects system performance and resource consumption. In this paper, we propose a joint optimization of load balancing and resource allocation in the cloud using an optimal container management strategy. We aim to enhance scheduling efficiency and reduce costs by improving the container's schedule requested digitally by users. An improved backtracking search optimization (IBSO) algorithm is used to allocate resources between end-users/IoT devices and the cloud under the consideration of service-level agreements. Mechanic quantum recurrent neural networks (MQ-RNNs) are designed to allocate, consolidate, and migrate containers in cloud environments. The various simulation measures used to validate the proposed strategy are energy consumption, number of active servers, number of interruptions, total cost, runtime, and statistical measures.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resource Allocation and Load Balancing Strategy in Cloud-fog Hybrid Computing Based on Cluster-collaboration
    Yang, Shouyi
    Cheng, Haoze
    Dang, Yaping
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 45 (07) : 2423 - 2431
  • [42] Optimal load balancing in cloud: Introduction to hybrid optimization algorithm
    Geetha, Perumal
    Vivekanandan, S. J.
    Yogitha, R.
    Jeyalakshmi, M. S.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 237
  • [43] Hierarchical Edge-Cloud SDN Controller System With Optimal Adaptive Resource Allocation for Load-Balancing
    Lin, Frank Po-Chen
    Tsai, Zsehong
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (01): : 265 - 276
  • [44] An efficient meta-heuristic resource allocation with load balancing in IoT-Fog-cloud computing environment
    Yakubu I.Z.
    Murali M.
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2023, 14 (03) : 2981 - 2992
  • [45] Self-improved moth flame for optimal container resource allocation in cloud
    Vhatkar, Kapil Netaji
    Bhole, Girish P.
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2022, 34 (23):
  • [46] COST BASED RESOURCE ALLOCATION STRATEGY FOR THE CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT
    Pandey, Manish
    Verma, Sachin Kumar
    2017 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2017,
  • [47] An Efficient Dynamic Resource Allocation Strategy for VM Environment in Cloud
    Nagpure, Mahesh B.
    Dahiwale, Prashant
    Marbate, Punam
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING (ICPC), 2015,
  • [48] Application type based resource allocation strategy in cloud environment
    Peng, Jun-jie
    Zhi, Xiao-fei
    Xie, Xiao-lan
    MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 2016, 47 : 385 - 391
  • [49] A Hybrid Strategy for Resource Allocation and Load Balancing in Virtualized Data Centers Using BSO Algorithms
    V. Jeyakrishnan
    P. Sengottuvelan
    Wireless Personal Communications, 2017, 94 : 2363 - 2375
  • [50] A Hybrid Strategy for Resource Allocation and Load Balancing in Virtualized Data Centers Using BSO Algorithms
    Jeyakrishnan, V.
    Sengottuvelan, P.
    WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 94 (04) : 2363 - 2375