A machine learning model to predict therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data

被引:1
|
作者
Mcdaniel, C. C. [1 ]
Lo-Ciganic, W. -h. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, J. [2 ]
Chou, C. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Harrison Coll Pharm, Dept Hlth Outcomes Res & Policy, 4306 Walker Bldg, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Pharmaceut Policy & Prescribing, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, North Florida South Georgia Vet Hlth Syst, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Machine learning; Prescribing behaviors; Social determinants of health; Therapeutic inertia; Treatment intensification; A1C GOAL ATTAINMENT; CLINICAL INERTIA; TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION; POPULATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s40618-023-02259-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To estimate the therapeutic inertia prevalence for patients with type 2 diabetes, develop and validate a machine learning model predicting therapeutic inertia, and determine the added predictive value of area-level social determinants of health (SDOH).Methods This prognostic study with a retrospective cohort design used OneFlorida data (linked electronic health records (EHRs) from 1240 practices/clinics in Florida). The study cohort included adults (aged >= 18) with type 2 diabetes, HbA1C >= 7% (53 mmol/mol), >= one ambulatory visit, and >= one antihyperglycemic medication prescribed (excluded patients prescribed insulin before HbA1C). The outcome was therapeutic inertia, defined as absence of treatment intensification within six months after HbA1C >= 7% (53 mmol/mol). The predictors were patient, provider, and healthcare system factors. Machine learning methods included gradient boosting machines (GBM), random forests (RF), elastic net (EN), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). The DeLong test compared the discriminative ability (represented by C-statistics) between models.Results The cohort included 31,087 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age = 58.89 (SD = 13.27) years, 50.50% male, 58.89% White). The therapeutic inertia prevalence was 39.80% among the 68,445 records. GBM outperformed (C-statistic from testing sample = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.84) RF (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.79-0.80), EN (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.80-0.81), and LASSO (C-statistic = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.80-0.81), p < 0.05. Area-level SDOH significantly increased the discriminative ability versus models without SDOH (C-statistic for GBM = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.84-0.85 vs. 0.84, 95% CI = 0.83-0.84), p < 0.05.Conclusions Using EHRs of patients with type 2 diabetes from a large state, machine learning predicted therapeutic inertia (prevalence = 40%). The model's ability to predict patients at high risk of therapeutic inertia is clinically applicable to diabetes care.
引用
收藏
页码:1419 / 1433
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Using Administrative Health Data to Predict Onset of Type 2 Diabetes
    Ravaut, Mathieu
    Harish, Vinyas
    Sadeghi, Hamed
    Leung, Kin Kwan
    Volkovs, Maksims
    Kornas, Kathy
    Watson, Tristan
    Poutanen, Tomi
    Rosella, Laura C.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (05) : E2111315
  • [2] The Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Bacteremia and Fungemia in Hospitalized Patients Using Electronic Health Record Data
    Bhavani, Sivasubramanium V.
    Lonjers, Zachary
    Carey, Kyle A.
    Afshar, Majid
    Gilbert, Emily R.
    Shah, Nirav S.
    Huang, Elbert S.
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (11) : E1020 - E1028
  • [3] Development of a Hypoglycemia Prediction Model for Veterans With Diabetes Using Supervised Machine Learning Applied to Electronic Health Record Data
    Raghavan, Sridharan
    Liu, Wenhui
    Baron, Anna
    Saxon, David
    Plomondon, Meg
    Ho, Michael
    Caplan, Liron
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2020, 141
  • [4] Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Bacteremia and Fungemia Using Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data
    Bhavani, S.
    Lonjers, Z.
    Carey, K.
    Gilbert, E. R.
    Afshar, M.
    Shah, N.
    Huang, E.
    Churpek, M. M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [5] Using Machine Learning and the Electronic Health Record to Predict Complicated Clostridium difficile Infection
    Li, Benjamin Y.
    Oh, Jeeheh
    Young, Vincent B.
    Rao, Krishna
    Wiens, Jenna
    [J]. OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 6 (05):
  • [6] Using Machine Learning to Identify Health Outcomes from Electronic Health Record Data
    Wong, Jenna
    Murray Horwitz, Mara
    Zhou, Li
    Toh, Sengwee
    [J]. CURRENT EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 5 (04) : 331 - 342
  • [7] Using Machine Learning to Identify Health Outcomes from Electronic Health Record Data
    Jenna Wong
    Mara Murray Horwitz
    Li Zhou
    Sengwee Toh
    [J]. Current Epidemiology Reports, 2018, 5 : 331 - 342
  • [8] Classifying Pseudogout Using Machine Learning Approaches With Electronic Health Record Data
    Tedeschi, Sara K.
    Cai, Tianrun
    He, Zeling
    Ahuja, Yuri
    Hong, Chuan
    Yates, Katherine A.
    Dahal, Kumar
    Xu, Chang
    Lyu, Houchen
    Yoshida, Kazuki
    Solomon, Daniel H.
    Cai, Tianxi
    Liao, Katherine P.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2021, 73 (03) : 442 - 448
  • [9] Classifying Pseudogout Using Machine Learning Approaches with Electronic Health Record Data
    Tedeschi, Sara K.
    Cai, Tianrun
    He, Zeling
    Ahuja, Yuri
    Hong, Chuan
    Yates, Katherine
    Dahal, Kumar
    Xu, Chang
    Lyu, Houchen
    Yoshida, Kazuki
    Solomon, Daniel
    Cai, Tianxi
    Liao, Katherine
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71
  • [10] Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data
    Gianfrancesco, Milena A.
    Tamang, Suzanne
    Yazdany, Jinoos
    Schmajuk, Gabriela
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (11) : 1544 - 1547