Recurrence rate after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of <20 mm non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: should we worry about the risk?

被引:0
|
作者
Capela, Tiago Lima [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ferreira, Ana Isabel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Silva, Vitor Macedo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Goncalves, Tiago Curdia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Castro, Francisca Dias [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cotter, Jose [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Senhora Oliveira Guimaraes, Gastroenterol Dept, Guimaraes, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, Life & Hlth Sci Res Inst ICVS, Sch Med, Braga, Portugal
[3] PT Govt Associate Lab, ICVS 3Bs, Guimaraes Braga, Portugal
[4] Hosp Senhora Oliveira, Rua Cutileiros, P-4835044 Creixomil, Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Piecemeal resection; endoscopic mucosal resection; recurrence rate; colorectal polyps; LOCAL RECURRENCE; ADENOMA RECURRENCE; COLONIC EMR; SOCIETY; POLYPECTOMY; NEOPLASIA; POLYPS;
D O I
10.1080/00365521.2023.2278425
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionThere is scarce data focused on recurrence neoplasia rate (RR) after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) of 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal lesions (NPL). We aimed to analyze the RR after pEMR of 10-19 mm NPL, identify risk factors for its development and compare it with RR after pEMR of >= 20 mm NPL.MethodsRetrospective cohort-study including all >= 10 mm NPL resected by pEMR in our center between 2018-2022 with an early repeat colonoscopy (ERC). RR was defined as recurrence neoplasia identified in the ERC EMR scar with virtual chromoendoscopy or histological confirmation.ResultsA total of 444 NPL were assessed, 124 (27.9%) with 10-19 mm. In the ERC, performed a median of 6 months after pEMR, RR was significantly lower for 10-19 mm NPL compared to >= 20 mm NPL (13/124 vs 68/320, p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, RR after pEMR of 15-19 mm NPL was significantly higher compared to 10-14 mm NPL (13/98 vs 0, p = 0.041) but not significantly different compared to >= 20 mm NPL (13/98 vs 68/320, p = 0.073). In multivariable analysis, size of NPL (HR 1.501, 95% CI 1.012-2.227, p = 0.044) was the only independent risk factor identified for RR for 10-19 mm NPL.ConclusionAlthough the early RR after pEMR of 10-19 mm NPL is significantly lower compared to >= 20 mm NPL, it is non-negligible (10.5%) and appears to be the highest among 15-19 mm NPL. The size of the lesion was the only independent risk factor for RR. Our findings should be accounted in the selection of the most appropriate post-polypectomy endoscopic surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 368
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] Standardised training for endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps to reduce recurrence (*STAR-LNPCP study): a multicentre cluster randomised trial
    Meulen, Lonne W. T.
    Bogie, Roel M. M.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Winkens, Bjorn
    Vlug, Marije S.
    Wolfhagen, Frank H. J.
    Baven-Pronk, Martine
    van der Voorn, Michael
    Schwartz, Matthijs P.
    Vogelaar, Lauran
    de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Wouter H.
    Seerden, Tom C. J.
    Hazen, Wouter L.
    Schrauwen, Ruud W. M.
    Alvarez Herrero, Lorenza
    Schreuder, Ramon-Michel M.
    van Nunen, Annick B.
    Stoop, Esther
    de Bruin, Gijs J.
    Bos, Philip
    Marsman, Willem A.
    Kuiper, Edith
    de Bievre, Marc
    Alderlieste, Yasser A.
    Roomer, Robert
    Groen, John
    Bargeman, Marloes
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    Roberts-Bos, Linda
    Boersma, Femke
    Thurnau, Karsten
    de Vries, Roland S.
    Ramaker, Jos M.
    Vleggaar, Frank P.
    de Ridder, Rogier J.
    Pellise, Maria
    Bourke, Michael J.
    Masclee, Ad A. M.
    Moons, Leon M. G.
    [J]. GUT, 2024, : 741 - 750
  • [32] IMPACT OF MARGIN THERMAL ABLATION ON RECURRENCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OF LARGE (≥40MM) COLORECTAL LESIONS
    Gauci, Julia
    Whitfield, Anthony
    O'Sullivan, Timothy
    Mandarino, Francesco
    Cronin, Oliver
    Medas, Renato
    Lee, Eric
    Burgess, Nicholas
    Bourke, Michael
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB507 - AB508
  • [33] Similar Rates of Histologic-Confirmed Recurrence After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Non-Pedunculated Polyps Among General Gastroenterologists and Advance Endoscopists
    Caskey, Kadon N.
    Cifuentes, Juan Gomez
    Berger, Scott
    Jove, Andre N.
    Sarvepalli, Shashank
    Jarbrink-Sehgal, Maria Ellionore
    Velez, Maria
    Hair, Clark
    Sealock, Robert J.
    Ketwaroo, Gyanprakash A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S498 - S498
  • [34] A Japanese Prospective Multicenter Study of Persistent Recurrence Rate and the Optimal Observation Timing After Piecemeal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Neoplasia
    Nakajima, Takeshi
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Sakamoto, Taku
    Ishikawa, Hideki
    Saito, Yutaka
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB400 - AB400
  • [35] Nongranular large non-pedunculated colonic polyps harbor an increased risk of synchronous large lesions: Implications of a "colonic mucosal phenotype" for practitioners of endoscopic resection
    O'Sullivan, T.
    Tate, D. J.
    Sidhu, M.
    Gupta, S.
    Cronin, O.
    Whitfield, A.
    Bourke, M. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 : 13 - 13
  • [36] THERMAL ABLATION OF MARGINS AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OF LARGE, NON-PEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL POLYPS TO PREVENT LOCAL NEOPLASIA RECURRENCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Dang, Frances
    Balfour, Marie
    Mendoza, Brian
    Chehade, Nabil El Hage
    Lin, Andy
    Le, Bryant
    Cheung, David
    Tavangar, Amirali
    Jariwalla, Neil
    Kwon, Joshua
    Chang, Kenneth
    Samarasena, Jason
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB516 - AB517
  • [37] SLICING VERSUS LOOPING-EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION(ESD) VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION(EMR) IN PATIENTS WITH NON-PEDUNCULATED POLYPS LARGER THAN 20MM
    Ofosu, Andrew
    Ramai, Daryl
    Sunkara, Tagore
    Ofori, Emmanuel
    Fields, Paul J.
    Gurram, Krishna C.
    Reddy, Madhavi
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB401 - AB401
  • [38] Endoscopic mucosal resection using cold snare versus hot snare in treatment for 10-19 mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: protocol of a non-inferiority randomised controlled study
    Jiang, Qingwei
    Yan, Xiaxiao
    Wang, Duan
    Zhang, Shengyu
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Feng, Yunlu
    Yang, Aiming
    Wu, Dong
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [39] Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (> 20 mm) non pedunculated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Ramai, Daryl
    Deliwala, Smit
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Kassab, Lena L.
    Draganov, Peter V.
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    Kochhar, Gursimran S.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (01) : E74 - E81
  • [40] Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC) After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Large (>20 mm) Non Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Ramai, Daryl
    Deliwala, Smit
    Mohan, Babu
    Kassab, Lena L.
    Draganov, Peter
    Othman, Mohamed
    Kochhar, Gursimran S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S105 - S105