Assessing the uptake of the type 1 diabetes core outcome set in randomized controlled trials: A Cross-Sectional study

被引:0
|
作者
Kari, Karim [1 ,3 ]
Thayani, Zohaib [1 ]
Ward, Shaelyn [1 ]
Magee, Trevor [1 ]
Jones, Garrett [1 ]
Fitzgerald, Kyle [1 ]
Magana, Kimberly [1 ]
Modi, Jay [1 ]
Hughes, Griffin [1 ]
Ford, Alicia Ito [1 ,2 ]
Vassar, Matt [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Off Med Student Res, Tulsa, OK 74107 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Tulsa, OK 74107 USA
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, 1111 W 17th St, Tulsa, OK 74107 USA
关键词
Core outcome set (COS); Type 1 diabetes (type 1 diabetes); Uptake analysis; Outcome consistency;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: This study analyzed uptake of the core outcome set (COS) for type 1 diabetes (T1D) and trends in its use before and after its development in December 2017. Methods: On June 26, 2023, ClinicalTrials.gov was systematically searched for T1D randomized controlled trials. The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database provided a COS of eight key outcomes for analysis. Included trials were analyzed for COS uptake before and after its release in December 2017 in a masked, duplicate fashion by independent reviewers. We also calculated the proportion of trials that measured the complete COS and assessed the most frequently reported COS outcomes. Results: Of 3,792 originally screened articles, 144 RCTs were included in the final sample. Following COS publication, its use steadily decreased. Within the COS, HbA1c and severe hypoglycemia were most frequently implemented as endpoints; other recommended outcomes were rarely used in the published trials. Conclusion: Despite the 2017 T1D COS publication, use has decreased over time. This inconsistency negatively influences evidence-based practices and care. Educating researchers on COS and promoting uptake is crucial. Wider COS adoption in T1D trials could enhance clinical research overall. Further study of barriers and facilitators influencing uptake is essential to support consistent use and reporting.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study
    Martinic-Cezar, Iva Jercic
    Marusic, Ana
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [42] Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study
    Iva Jerčić Martinić-Cezar
    Ana Marušić
    Trials, 20
  • [43] Reporting sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials published in nursing journals: A cross-sectional study
    Tam, Wilson
    Lo, Kenneth
    Woo, Brigitte
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 102
  • [44] Transparency in surgical randomized clinical trials: cross-sectional observational study
    Helliwell, J. A.
    Shelton, B.
    Mahmood, H.
    Blanco-Colino, R.
    Fitzgerald, J. E.
    Harrison, E. M.
    Bhangu, A.
    Chapman, S. J.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (05): : 977 - 984
  • [45] Underreporting of Secondary Endpoints in Randomized Trials Cross-sectional, Observational Study
    Matthews, Jacob H.
    Bhanderi, Shivam
    Chapman, Stephen J.
    Nepogodiev, Dmitri
    Pinkney, Thomas
    Bhangu, Aneel
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (06) : 982 - 986
  • [46] OUTCOME SWITCHING AMONG PHASE 3 INTERVENTIONAL RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS
    Bansal, Rishi
    Khan, Rishad
    Gimpaya, Nikko
    Scaffidi, Michael A.
    Li, Juana
    Verma, Yash
    Elsolh, Karam
    Grover, Samir C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S355 - S355
  • [47] Diabetes stigma and its association with diabetes outcomes: a cross-sectional study of adults with type 1 diabetes
    Hansen, Ulla Moller
    Olesen, Kasper
    Willaing, Ingrid
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 48 (08) : 855 - 861
  • [48] TRANSPARENCY IN SURGICAL RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS: CROSS-SECTIONAL, OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Helliwell, J. A.
    Shelton, B.
    Mahmood, H.
    Blanco-Colino, R.
    Fitzgerald, J. E.
    Harrison, E. M.
    Bhangu, A.
    Chapman, S. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [49] Transparency in Surgical Randomised Controlled Trials: Cross-Sectional, Observational Study
    Helliwell, J.
    Shelton, B.
    Mahmood, H.
    Blanco-Colino, R.
    Fitzgerald, J. E.
    Harrison, E.
    Bhangu, A.
    Chapman, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 17 - 18
  • [50] Research Waste in Surgical Randomised Controlled Trials: Cross-sectional Study
    Aldaffaa, M.
    Downey, C.
    Chapman, S.
    Jayne, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 10 - 10