A global review on arid zone restoration: approaches and challenges

被引:7
|
作者
Stapleton, Joseph [1 ]
Bates, Sarah [2 ]
Lewis, Megan [2 ]
Turner, Shane R. [3 ]
Warne, David [2 ]
Florentine, Singarayer [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Federat Univ Australia, Future Reg Res Ctr, Sch Sci Psychol & Sport, Ballarat, Vic 3350, Australia
[2] Greening Australia, Level 3,349 Collins St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Sch Mol & Life Sci, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
[4] RMIT Univ, STEM Coll, Appl Chem & Environm Sci, Sch Sci, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
global review; restoration; seedling growth; seedling survival; NITROGEN LIMITATION; FIELD PERFORMANCE; INNER-MONGOLIA; TREE GUARDS; WET YEARS; SEEDLINGS; VEGETATION; GROWTH; PLANT; REFORESTATION;
D O I
10.1111/rec.14078
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Arid environments have become degraded in recent times through human activity highlighting the need for restoration works to reverse this trend. One of the most common forms of restoration works is revegetation. However, revegetation is difficult in the arid zone due to a combination of environmental factors such as low moisture and extreme temperatures, as well as financial and administrative factors. In this review, we investigated the literature describing various methods available for arid revegetation, and assess their utility for revegetation activities. Each of the methods investigated were found to have potential advantages and disadvantages, though some general trends were observed. Two main planting methods were identified, "out-planting" and "direct seeding." Which of these methods to use depends on the conditions of the project being undertaken. Out-planting appeared to be the most suited approach to smaller scale projects with higher budget availability, whereas direct seeding was more suited to large scale, lower budget projects. Weed control prior to planting was identified as being critical for success in most works, whereas soil ripping was beneficial for direct seeding projects. Among the soil amendments investigated, water-holding gels were most likely to be beneficial, whereas fertilizers were riskier due to their potential to reduce drought tolerance and increase weed invasion. Microbial inoculation with mycorrhiza showed high potential to improve plant performance but may be held back by the lack of suitable commercial sources. Newer seed technologies, such as synthetic seed coats and pellets, show promise, but this issue still requires further research and development.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparative review of Urdu stemmers: Approaches and challenges
    Jabbar, Abdul
    ul Islam, Saif
    Hussain, Shafiq
    Akhunzada, Adnan
    Ilahi, Manzoor
    COMPUTER SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 34
  • [42] APPROACHES AND SYSTEMS IN AUGMENTATION OF GRASSLAND IN SEMI ARID ZONE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BUNDELKHAND TRACT
    KANODIA, KC
    VELAYUDHAN, KC
    RAI, P
    ANNALS OF ARID ZONE, 1980, 19 (04) : 469 - 475
  • [43] A Review of the Hyporheic Zone, Stream Restoration, and Means to Enhance Denitrification
    Merill, Leanne
    Tonjes, David J.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 44 (21) : 2337 - 2379
  • [44] Advances in Global Oyster Reef Restoration: Innovations and Sustainable Ecological Approaches
    Jamil, Asad
    Ahmad, Ambreen
    Zhao, Yong
    Zhao, Yuxuan
    Yang, Chen
    Li, Yanping
    Tu, Jianbo
    Niu, Fuxin
    Kong, Wenliang
    Liu, Xianhua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [45] ARID ZONE RESEARCH
    EYRE, SR
    GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 1959, 125 (02): : 269 - 270
  • [46] ARID ZONE RESEARCH
    不详
    NATURE, 1952, 169 (4288) : 11 - 12
  • [47] ARID ZONE RESEARCH
    STAMP, LD
    NATURE, 1962, 195 (4842) : 658 - &
  • [48] ARID ZONE RESEARCH
    BOKE, RL
    PERES, J
    THORNTON, HG
    SCIENCE, 1952, 115 (2975) : 4 - 5
  • [49] ARID ZONE RESEARCH
    GOLDSTEIN, S
    NATURE, 1952, 170 (4321) : 300 - 302
  • [50] ARID ZONE PROBLEMS
    DIXEY, F
    NATURE, 1960, 187 (4734) : 295 - 297