Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction

被引:12
|
作者
Okimoto, Naomasa [1 ]
Yasaka, Koichiro [1 ]
Kaiume, Masafumi [1 ]
Kanemaru, Noriko [1 ]
Suzuki, Yuichi [1 ]
Abe, Osamu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 7-3-1 Hongo,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Liver; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Deep learning; Multidetector computed tomography;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-023-03834-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to compare the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection performance, interobserver agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories, and image quality between deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid IR) in CT.Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT between October 2021 and March 2022. Arterial, portal, and delayed phase images were reconstructed using DLR and Hybrid IR. Two blinded readers independently read the image sets with detecting HCCs, scoring LI-RADS, and evaluating image quality.Results A total of 26 patients with HCC (mean age, 73 years +/- 12.3) and 23 patients without HCC (mean age, 66 years +/- 14.7) were included. The figures of merit (FOM) for the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis in detecting HCC averaged for the readers were 0.925 (reader 1, 0.937; reader 2, 0.913) in DLR and 0.878 (reader 1, 0.904; reader 2, 0.851) in Hybrid IR, and the FOM in DLR were significantly higher than that in Hybrid IR (p = 0.038). The interobserver agreement (Cohen's weighted kappa statistics) for LI-RADS categories was moderate for DLR (0.595; 95% CI, 0.585-0.605) and significantly superior to Hybrid IR (0.568; 95% CI, 0.553-0.582). According to both readers, DLR was significantly superior to Hybrid IR in terms of image quality (p <= 0.021).Conclusion DLR improved HCC detection, interobserver agreement for LI-RADS categories, and image quality in evalua-tions of HCC compared to Hybrid IR in abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. [GRAPHICS]
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1289
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice: A pictorial minireview
    Liava, Christina
    Sinakos, Emmanouil
    Papadopoulou, Elissavet
    Giannakopoulou, Lamprini
    Potsi, Stamatia
    Moumtzouoglou, Anestis
    Chatziioannou, Anthi
    Stergioulas, Loukas
    Kalogeropoulou, Lydia
    Dedes, Ioannis
    Akriviadis, Evangelos
    Chourmouzi, Danai
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 28 (32) : 4540 - 4556
  • [42] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice:A pictorial minireview
    Christina Liava
    Emmanouil Sinakos
    Elissavet Papadopoulou
    Lamprini Giannakopoulou
    Stamatia Potsi
    Anestis Moumtzouoglou
    Anthi Chatziioannou
    Loukas Stergioulas
    Lydia Kalogeropoulou
    Ioannis Dedes
    Evangelos Akriviadis
    Danai Chourmouzi
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2022, 28 (32) : 4540 - 4556
  • [43] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: Reliability and agreement for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional treatment response
    Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
    Ekladious, Mena E. Y.
    Badran, Ethar M.
    Madkour, Sherihan S.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (11) : 524 - 534
  • [44] Deep-Learning Reconstruction of High-Resolution CT Improves Interobserver Agreement for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Fibrosis
    Hamada, Akiyoshi
    Yasaka, Koichiro
    Hatano, Sosuke
    Kurokawa, Mariko
    Inui, Shohei
    Kubo, Takatoshi
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Abe, Osamu
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2024, 75 (03): : 542 - 548
  • [45] Correction to: Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017
    Nieun Seo
    Myoung Soo Kim
    Mi-Suk Park
    Jin-Young Choi
    Richard K. G. Do
    Kyunghwa Han
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 4400 - 4401
  • [46] Diagnostic performance of CT versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Kim, Yeun-Yoon
    Lee, Sunyoung
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Son, Won Jeong
    Roh, Yun Ho
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Lee, Ji Eun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (10) : 6723 - 6729
  • [47] Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Makkar, Jasnit
    Guniganti, Preethi
    Cornman-Homonoff, Joshua
    Lee, Michael J.
    Pittman, Meredith
    Askin, Gulce
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (07) : E205 - E215
  • [48] Diagnostic performance of CT versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Yeun-Yoon Kim
    Sunyoung Lee
    Jaeseung Shin
    Won Jeong Son
    Yun Ho Roh
    Jeong Ah Hwang
    Ji Eun Lee
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 6723 - 6729
  • [49] New strategy for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M to improve diagnostic performance of MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm
    Jong Keon Jang
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Jae Ho Byun
    Seo Young Park
    So Jung Lee
    So Yeon Kim
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    Pyo-Nyun Kim
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2289 - 2298
  • [50] Hepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation by using the liver imaging reporting and data system
    Nieun Seo
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    Hyungjin Rhee
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 3761 - 3771