Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar thickness after open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele

被引:0
|
作者
Sangalan Sasaoka, Alexandre Kim [1 ]
Moron, Antonio Fernandes [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Araujo, Edward, Jr. [1 ]
Sanudo, Adriana [4 ]
Barbosa, Mauricio Mendes [2 ,3 ]
Figuinha Milani, Herbene Jose [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pereira Sarmento, Stephanno Gomes [2 ,3 ]
Cavalheiro, Sergio [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Sao Paulo EPM UNIFESP, Dept Obstet, Paulista Sch Med, Rua Belchior Azevedo,156 Apto 111 Torre Vitoria, BR-05089030 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Paulista Ctr Fetal Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Santa Joana Matern & Hosp, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Fed Univ Sao Paulo EPM UNIFESP, Dept Prevent Med, Paulista Sch Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] Fed Univ Sao Paulo EPM UNIFESP, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Paulista Sch Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Myelomeningocele; Fetal surgery; Uterine scar; Dehiscence; Cut-off point;
D O I
10.1007/s00381-022-05642-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to analyse the evolution of uterine scar thickness after open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele (MMC) by ultrasonography, and to establish a cut-off point for uterine scar thickness associated with high-risk of uterine rupture. Methods A prospective longitudinal study was conducted with 77 pregnant women who underwent open fetal surgery for MMC between 24 and 27 weeks of gestation. After fetal surgery, ultrasound follow-up was performed once a week, and the scar on the uterine wall was evaluated and its thickness was measured by transabdominal ultrasound. At least five measurements of the uterine scar thickness were performed during pregnancy. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was constructed to obtain a cut-off point for the thickness of the scar capable of detecting the absence of thinning. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to evaluate the probability of thinning during pregnancy follow-up. Results The mean +/- standard deviation of maternal age (years), gestational age at surgery (weeks), gestational age at delivery (weeks), and birth weight (g) were 30.6 +/- 4.5, 26.1 +/- 0.8, 34.3 +/- 1.2 and 2287.4 +/- 334.4, respectively. Thinning was observed in 23 patients (29.9%). Pregnant women with no thinning had an average of 17.1 +/- 5.2 min longer surgery time than pregnant women with thinning. A decrease of 1.0 mm in the thickness of the uterine scar was associated with an increased likelihood of thinning by 1.81-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.47; p < 0.001). The area below the ROC curve was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.806-0.954; p < 0.001), and the cut-off point was <= 3.0 mm, which simultaneously presented greater sensitivity and specificity. After 63 days of surgery, the probability of uterine scarring was 50% (95% CI: 58-69). Conclusion A cut-off point of <= 3.0 mm in the thickness of the uterine scar after open fetal surgery for MMC may be used during ultrasonography monitoring for decision-making regarding the risk of uterine rupture and indication of caesarean section.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 661
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS AFTER OPEN FETAL MYELOMENINGOCELE REPAIR
    Mohrlen, U.
    Winder, F.
    Ochsenbein, N.
    Mazzone, L.
    Zimmermann, R.
    Meuli, M.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2018, 148 : 18S - 18S
  • [22] Open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele - is there the learning curve at reduction mother and fetal morbidity?
    Horzelska, Ewa, I
    Zamlynski, Mateusz
    Horzelski, Tomasz
    Zamlynski, Jacek
    Pastuszka, Agnieszka
    Bablok, Rafal
    Herman-Sucharska, Izabela
    Koszutski, Tomasz
    Olejek, Anita
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2020, 91 (03) : 123 - 131
  • [23] Re: Perinatal outcomes after open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele repair: a retrospective cohort study
    Jouannic, Jean-Marie
    Zerah, Michel
    Rigouzzo, Agnes
    Guilbaud, Lucie
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (01) : 130 - 131
  • [24] Ultrasound Exploration of the Uterine Scar After Cesarean Section
    Nour, Corina Madalina
    Penciu, Roxana Cleopatra
    Izvoranu, Silvia
    Steriu, Liliana
    Postolache, Iulia
    PROCEEDINGS OF SOGR 2018: THE 17TH NATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE ROMANIAN SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY & FIRST ADVANCED COLPOSCOPY COURSE, 2019, : 557 - 560
  • [25] Ultrasound Predictability of Lower Uterine Segment Cesarean Section Scar Thickness
    Tazion, Shazia
    Hafeez, Maimoona
    Manzoor, Rukhsana
    Rana, Tashhir
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2018, 28 (05): : 361 - 364
  • [26] Laparoscopic repair of uterine dehiscence after open maternal-fetal surgery
    Van Mieghem, Tim
    Smith, Martha K.
    Murji, Ally
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (06) : 686 - 687
  • [27] Open fetal myelomeningocele repair at a university hospital: surgery and pregnancy outcomes
    da Rocha, Luana Sarmento Neves
    Bunduki, Victor
    de Amorim Filho, Antonio Gomes
    Cardeal, Daniel Dante
    Matushita, Hamilton
    Fernandes, Hermann Santos
    Nani, Fernando Souza
    de Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira
    de Carvalho, Mario Henrique Burlacchini
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (06) : 1443 - 1454
  • [28] Antenatal Ultrasound Compared to MRI Evaluation of Fetal Myelomeningocele: A Prenatal and Postnatal Evaluation
    Munoz, Jessian Louis
    Bishop, Elaine
    Reider, Mitchell
    Singh, Katherine
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 81S - 81S
  • [29] SUPPLEMENTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA WITH REMIFENTANIL FOR OPEN FETAL SURGERY FOR MYELOMENINGOCELE REPAIR
    Marsh, Benjamin J.
    Sinskey, Jina
    Ferschl, Marla
    Rollins, Mark
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 : 520 - 520
  • [30] Open fetal myelomeningocele repair at a university hospital: surgery and pregnancy outcomes
    Luana Sarmento Neves da Rocha
    Victor Bunduki
    Antônio Gomes de Amorim Filho
    Daniel Dante Cardeal
    Hamilton Matushita
    Hermann Santos Fernandes
    Fernando Souza Nani
    Rossana Pulcineli Vieira de Francisco
    Mário Henrique Burlacchini de Carvalho
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 1443 - 1454