Universities Patent Quality Indicators (UPQI): A Bibliometric and Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Leonidio, Ueliton da Costa [1 ,2 ]
Cardoso, Douglas de Oliveira [3 ]
de Souza, Cristina Gomes [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Ctr Technol Educ Celso Suckow da Fonseca CEFE, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Catholic Univ Petropolis UCP, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Inst Politecn Tomar, Tomar, Santarem, Portugal
关键词
Patents; Universities Patent Quality Indicators; Bibliometric analysis; Systematic literature review; VOSViewer; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; BAYH-DOLE ACT; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE FLOW; TECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE; IMPACT; POLICY; CHINA; COMMERCIALIZATION;
D O I
10.5530/jscires.12.2.027
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
University patent filings have increased worldwide over the years. However, in addition to quantity, it is important to evaluate the quality of these patents. Some studies have addressed this issue, but most of them are limited to analyzing a single or few quality indicators applied in specific areas. The literature on the subject is fragmented, so it is important to summarize this content and generate a systematized knowledge. In order to reduce this gap in the literature, this article focuses on University Patent Quality Indicators (UPQI) aiming to identify the metrics that have been used to evaluate the quality of these documents. Based on a bibliometric and systematic review, the study presents bibliometric indicators, scientific collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling, as well as quality indicators found in the literature. The survey of publications was conducted on the Web of Science database. Out of a total of 760 articles, 68 were selected to present research in the field of UPQI. The results show an organized set of metrics and other information that can be used by managers, researchers and funding agencies to guide policies and decision-making that contribute to promoting technological development and partnerships with the productive sector.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 304
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review
    Miranda W. Langendam
    Thomas Piggott
    Monika Nothacker
    Arnav Agarwal
    David Armstrong
    Tejan Baldeh
    Jeffrey Braithwaite
    Carolina Castro Martins
    Andrea Darzi
    Itziar Etxeandia
    Ivan Florez
    Jan Hoving
    Samer G. Karam
    Thomas Kötter
    Joerg J. Meerpohl
    Reem A. Mustafa
    Giovanna E. U. Muti-Schünemann
    Philip J. van der Wees
    Markus Follmann
    Holger J. Schünemann
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [32] Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
    Maes-Carballo, Marta
    Gomez-Fandino, Yolanda
    Roberto Estrada-Lopez, Carlos
    Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla
    Khan, Khalid Saeed
    Martin-Diaz, Manuel
    Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (12)
  • [33] Quality assessment indicators in antenatal care worldwide: a systematic review
    Sofia Moron-Duarte, Lina
    Ramirez Varela, Andrea
    Segura, Omar
    Freitas da Silveira, Mariangela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 31 (07) : 497 - 505
  • [34] Quality indicators for hospital antimicrobial stewardship programmes: a systematic review
    O'Riordan, F.
    Shiely, F.
    Byrne, S.
    Fleming, A.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 76 (06) : 1406 - 1419
  • [35] Perioperative structure and process quality and safety indicators: a systematic review
    Chazapis, M.
    Gilhooly, D.
    Smith, A. F.
    Myles, P. S.
    Haller, G.
    Grocott, M. P. W.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (01) : 51 - 66
  • [36] Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review
    Schneberk, Todd
    Bolshakova, Maria
    Sloan, Kylie
    Chang, Evelyn
    Stal, Julia
    Dinalo, Jennifer
    Jimenez, Elvira
    Motala, Aneesa
    Hempel, Susanne
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (12) : 3147 - 3161
  • [37] Quality Indicators for High-Need Patients: a Systematic Review
    Todd Schneberk
    Maria Bolshakova
    Kylie Sloan
    Evelyn Chang
    Julia Stal
    Jennifer Dinalo
    Elvira Jimenez
    Aneesa Motala
    Susanne Hempel
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2022, 37 : 3147 - 3161
  • [38] Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review
    Langendam, Miranda W.
    Piggott, Thomas
    Nothacker, Monika
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Armstrong, David
    Baldeh, Tejan
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Martins, Carolina Castro
    Darzi, Andrea
    Etxeandia, Itziar
    Florez, Ivan
    Hoving, Jan
    Karam, Samer G.
    Koetter, Thomas
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Muti-Schunemann, Giovanna E. U.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Follmann, Markus
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Quality indicators for community care for older people: A systematic review
    Joling, Karlijn J.
    van Eenoo, Liza
    Vetrano, Davide L.
    Smaardijk, Veerle R.
    Declercq, Anja
    Onder, Graziano
    van Hout, Hein P. J.
    van der Roest, Henriette G.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01):
  • [40] Identifying Indicators of Quality Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Duc, Jacqueline
    Widger, Kimberley
    Johnston, Kelly
    Rapoport, Adam
    Siden, Harold
    Feudtner, Chris
    Wolfe, Joanne
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : E133 - E134